Hydrodynamic Characterization of Bodies of Revolution through Statistical-Empirical Prediction Modeling Using Machine Learning

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
C. Thurman, J. R. Somero
{"title":"Hydrodynamic Characterization of Bodies of Revolution through Statistical-Empirical Prediction Modeling Using Machine Learning","authors":"C. Thurman, J. R. Somero","doi":"10.5957/josr.06200035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning algorithms, namely artificial neural network modeling, were used to create prediction models for force and moment coefficients of axisymmetric bodies of revolution. These prediction models had highly nonlinear functional relationships to both geometric parameters and inflow conditions, totaling five input factors. A uniform experimental design was created consisting of 50 design points in these five factors and dictated which test points to simulate. Data was generated using computational fluid dynamic simulations, which were performed on all geometries using NavyFOAM at the experimental conditions prescribed by the designed experiment. The prediction models were validated by comparing behavioral trends in responses to previous research conducted by the author on a similar geometry. A test data sets was also created and used to ensure that the prediction models were not overfit to the training data and that they could accurately predict arbitrary geometries and inflow conditions within the experimental design region. Once the prediction models were validated, they were used to study the effects of varying the geometric parameters, inherent to the experiment, on each of the force and moment coefficients.\n \n \n Multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) schemes used in the early concept design phases for aero/hydrodynamic vehicles often use simplified planar maneuvering characteristics based on empirical or analytical relations in order to limit the computational cost of maneuverability prediction. This method leaves a more detailed analysis of the maneuvering behavior of a design to later in the process, where improvement or correction of an adverse behavior may be difficult to implement. The analysis of out-of-plane conditions or combined pitch-yaw conditions especially, are usually relegated to the detail analysis phase as empirical/ analytical descriptions of these conditions are lacking in the literature. It is therefore desired to develop a method to move these more detailed maneuvering analyses forward in the design phase.\n","PeriodicalId":50052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ship Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ship Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5957/josr.06200035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms, namely artificial neural network modeling, were used to create prediction models for force and moment coefficients of axisymmetric bodies of revolution. These prediction models had highly nonlinear functional relationships to both geometric parameters and inflow conditions, totaling five input factors. A uniform experimental design was created consisting of 50 design points in these five factors and dictated which test points to simulate. Data was generated using computational fluid dynamic simulations, which were performed on all geometries using NavyFOAM at the experimental conditions prescribed by the designed experiment. The prediction models were validated by comparing behavioral trends in responses to previous research conducted by the author on a similar geometry. A test data sets was also created and used to ensure that the prediction models were not overfit to the training data and that they could accurately predict arbitrary geometries and inflow conditions within the experimental design region. Once the prediction models were validated, they were used to study the effects of varying the geometric parameters, inherent to the experiment, on each of the force and moment coefficients. Multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) schemes used in the early concept design phases for aero/hydrodynamic vehicles often use simplified planar maneuvering characteristics based on empirical or analytical relations in order to limit the computational cost of maneuverability prediction. This method leaves a more detailed analysis of the maneuvering behavior of a design to later in the process, where improvement or correction of an adverse behavior may be difficult to implement. The analysis of out-of-plane conditions or combined pitch-yaw conditions especially, are usually relegated to the detail analysis phase as empirical/ analytical descriptions of these conditions are lacking in the literature. It is therefore desired to develop a method to move these more detailed maneuvering analyses forward in the design phase.
基于机器学习的统计经验预测模型对旋转体的流体动力学特性
利用机器学习算法,即人工神经网络建模,建立轴对称公转体的力系数和力矩系数预测模型。这些预测模型与几何参数和流入条件具有高度非线性的函数关系,总共有五个输入因素。一个统一的实验设计是由这五个因素中的50个设计点组成的,并规定了哪些测试点要模拟。数据是通过计算流体动力学模拟生成的,在设计实验规定的实验条件下,使用NavyFOAM对所有几何形状进行了模拟。通过比较作者之前在类似几何上进行的研究的行为趋势,验证了预测模型的有效性。还创建了一个测试数据集,以确保预测模型不会与训练数据过拟合,并且可以准确预测实验设计区域内的任意几何形状和流入条件。一旦预测模型得到验证,它们就被用来研究改变实验固有的几何参数对每个力和力矩系数的影响。多学科优化(MDO)方案用于气动/水动力飞行器的早期概念设计阶段,通常使用基于经验或分析关系的简化平面机动特性,以限制机动预测的计算成本。这种方法将对设计的操纵行为进行更详细的分析,留到后期的过程中,此时对不利行为的改进或纠正可能难以实现。由于文献中缺乏对这些条件的经验/分析描述,对面外条件或俯仰-偏航组合条件的分析通常被归为细节分析阶段。因此,需要开发一种方法,在设计阶段将这些更详细的机动分析向前推进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ship Research
Journal of Ship Research 工程技术-工程:海洋
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Original and Timely technical papers addressing problems of shipyard techniques and production of merchant and naval ships appear in this quarterly publication. Since its inception, the Journal of Ship Production and Design (formerly the Journal of Ship Production) has been a forum for peer-reviewed, professionally edited papers from academic and industry sources. As such, it has influenced the worldwide development of ship production engineering as a fully qualified professional discipline. The expanded scope seeks papers in additional areas, specifically ship design, including design for production, plus other marine technology topics, such as ship operations, shipping economic, and safety. Each issue contains a well-rounded selection of technical papers relevant to marine professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信