Pre-service teachers’ reflections on content knowledge through microteaching

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kelly R. Maguire
{"title":"Pre-service teachers’ reflections on content knowledge through microteaching","authors":"Kelly R. Maguire","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2022.2146082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Teacher preparation is an integral factor in education. Pre-service teachers do not have the same experience or content knowledge (CK) level as veteran teachers. Pre-service teachers must have opportunities to bolster their CK during teacher training. The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore how pre-service teachers described content knowledge using reflection-on-action after the planning, teaching, and feedback stages of microteaching. This study was theoretically supported by Schön’s reflective practitioner model and guided by one research question. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 11 pre-service teachers who participated in microteaching sessions. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Four themes emerged from the data through thematic analysis: Pre-service teachers (1) rely on prior knowledge, (2) benefit from collaboration, (3) compensate when faced with unfamiliar content, (4) and feel microteaching validates content knowledge. Findings suggest that pre-service teachers benefit from engaging in reflection-on-action as a tool to facilitate the growth and development of content knowledge specific to their degree program and future teacher employment. This study recommends using reflection and microteaching with pre-service teachers in teacher training and future research.","PeriodicalId":51594,"journal":{"name":"Reflective Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"153 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflective Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2146082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Teacher preparation is an integral factor in education. Pre-service teachers do not have the same experience or content knowledge (CK) level as veteran teachers. Pre-service teachers must have opportunities to bolster their CK during teacher training. The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore how pre-service teachers described content knowledge using reflection-on-action after the planning, teaching, and feedback stages of microteaching. This study was theoretically supported by Schön’s reflective practitioner model and guided by one research question. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 11 pre-service teachers who participated in microteaching sessions. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Four themes emerged from the data through thematic analysis: Pre-service teachers (1) rely on prior knowledge, (2) benefit from collaboration, (3) compensate when faced with unfamiliar content, (4) and feel microteaching validates content knowledge. Findings suggest that pre-service teachers benefit from engaging in reflection-on-action as a tool to facilitate the growth and development of content knowledge specific to their degree program and future teacher employment. This study recommends using reflection and microteaching with pre-service teachers in teacher training and future research.
职前教师通过微格教学对内容知识的思考
教师准备是教育中不可或缺的因素。职前教师的经验或内容知识水平不如资深教师。职前教师必须有机会在教师培训期间加强他们的CK。这项定性描述性研究的目的是探索职前教师在微格教学的计划、教学和反馈阶段后,如何通过对行动的反思来描述内容知识。这项研究在理论上得到了施的反思性实践者模型的支持,并以一个研究问题为指导。采用目的性抽样方法,招募了11名参加微格教学的职前教师。数据是通过半结构化访谈收集的。通过主题分析,数据中出现了四个主题:职前教师(1)依赖先验知识,(2)从合作中受益,(3)面对陌生内容时给予补偿,(4)感觉微格教学验证了内容知识。研究结果表明,职前教师从反思行动中受益,这是一种促进其学位课程和未来教师就业相关内容知识增长和发展的工具。本研究建议在教师培训和未来研究中,对职前教师进行反思和微格教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信