Can playing an “unfair game” promote ethical decision-making? The use of the “trading game” in secondary-school geography lessons

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Hofmann
{"title":"Can playing an “unfair game” promote ethical decision-making? The use of the “trading game” in secondary-school geography lessons","authors":"J. Hofmann","doi":"10.1080/10382046.2020.1796308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The dual factual and ethical dimension of learning in geography calls for consideration of how pupils in schools handle this complexity and how teachers might promote the development of ethical decision-making skills in the geography classroom. Proceeding from, and taking a new theoretical approach to, intuitive ethics, this article demonstrates the particular utility of the “trading game” as a learning setting for promoting ethical decision-making in the geography classroom. The researcher analysed the group discussions that took place subsequently to the use of the game via the documentary method, and, in line with reconstructive qualitative research practices, developed a typology that illuminated the decision-making logics driving pupils’ gameplay and their engagement with the dual complexity of factual and ethical learning in geography lessons. The findings point to implications for didactic and methodological practice with regard to the type-specific promotion and development of ethical decision-making in the geography classroom.","PeriodicalId":46522,"journal":{"name":"International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education","volume":"30 1","pages":"238 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10382046.2020.1796308","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1796308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The dual factual and ethical dimension of learning in geography calls for consideration of how pupils in schools handle this complexity and how teachers might promote the development of ethical decision-making skills in the geography classroom. Proceeding from, and taking a new theoretical approach to, intuitive ethics, this article demonstrates the particular utility of the “trading game” as a learning setting for promoting ethical decision-making in the geography classroom. The researcher analysed the group discussions that took place subsequently to the use of the game via the documentary method, and, in line with reconstructive qualitative research practices, developed a typology that illuminated the decision-making logics driving pupils’ gameplay and their engagement with the dual complexity of factual and ethical learning in geography lessons. The findings point to implications for didactic and methodological practice with regard to the type-specific promotion and development of ethical decision-making in the geography classroom.
玩“不公平游戏”能促进道德决策吗?“交易游戏”在中学地理教学中的运用
摘要地理学习的双重事实和道德维度要求考虑学校学生如何处理这种复杂性,以及教师如何在地理课堂上促进道德决策技能的发展。本文从直觉伦理学出发,并采用一种新的理论方法,展示了“交易游戏”作为促进地理课堂道德决策的学习环境的特殊效用。研究人员通过纪录片的方法分析了游戏使用后进行的小组讨论,并根据重建的定性研究实践,开发了一种类型学,阐明了驱动学生游戏性的决策逻辑,以及他们在地理课上参与事实和道德学习的双重复杂性。研究结果指出,在地理课堂中促进和发展特定类型的道德决策方面,教学和方法论实践具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education publishes quality research studies within the context of geographical and environmental education. The journal endeavours to promote international interest and dissemination of research in the field, provides a forum for critique, and demonstrates the relevance of research studies to good professional practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信