Is Complicity in Oppression a Privilege? Toward Social Justice Education as Mutual Aid

IF 2.6 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nicolas J. Tanchuk, Tomas Rocha, M. Kruse
{"title":"Is Complicity in Oppression a Privilege? Toward Social Justice Education as Mutual Aid","authors":"Nicolas J. Tanchuk, Tomas Rocha, M. Kruse","doi":"10.17763/1943-5045-91.3.341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of privilege is widely used in social justice education to denote unearned advantages accrued by members of dominant groups through the oppression of subordinate groups. In this conceptual essay, Nicolas Tanchuk, Tomas Rocha, and Marc Kruse argue that an atomistic conception of advantage implicit in the discourse of privilege supports persistent inequity between groups contrary to the intentions of social justice educators. To solve this “problem of privilege,” the authors draw on themes in Black feminist and Indigenous thought to advance a reframing of the way educators teach advantage that is based in foundational relational responsibilities. This new frame, social justice education as mutual aid, retains the power to describe oppressive relations between groups while portraying oppression as disadvantageous to all.","PeriodicalId":48207,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Educational Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-91.3.341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The concept of privilege is widely used in social justice education to denote unearned advantages accrued by members of dominant groups through the oppression of subordinate groups. In this conceptual essay, Nicolas Tanchuk, Tomas Rocha, and Marc Kruse argue that an atomistic conception of advantage implicit in the discourse of privilege supports persistent inequity between groups contrary to the intentions of social justice educators. To solve this “problem of privilege,” the authors draw on themes in Black feminist and Indigenous thought to advance a reframing of the way educators teach advantage that is based in foundational relational responsibilities. This new frame, social justice education as mutual aid, retains the power to describe oppressive relations between groups while portraying oppression as disadvantageous to all.
共谋压迫是一种特权吗?论社会正义教育的互助性
特权的概念在社会正义教育中被广泛使用,用来表示优势群体成员通过压迫从属群体而获得的不劳而获的优势。在这篇概念性文章中,尼古拉斯·坦丘克、托马斯·罗查和马克·克鲁斯认为,特权话语中隐含的优势原子概念支持了群体之间持续的不平等,这与社会正义教育者的意图背道而驰。为了解决这个“特权问题”,两位作者借鉴了黑人女权主义者和土著思想的主题,推动了教育者基于基本关系责任教授优势的方式的重构。这个新的框架,社会正义教育作为互助,保留了描述群体之间压迫关系的权力,同时把压迫描绘成对所有人都不利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harvard Educational Review
Harvard Educational Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Harvard Educational Review (HER) accepts contributions from researchers, scholars, policy makers, practitioners, teachers, students, and informed observers in education and related fields. In addition to original reports of research and theory, HER welcomes articles that reflect on teaching and practice in educational settings in the United States and abroad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信