Assessment of a Novel, Adjustable Task Trainer for Cardiac Surgical Skills.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Abigail White, Simon R Turner, Michael C Moon, Bin Zheng
{"title":"Assessment of a Novel, Adjustable Task Trainer for Cardiac Surgical Skills.","authors":"Abigail White, Simon R Turner, Michael C Moon, Bin Zheng","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A recent needs assessment in Canadian cardiac surgery programs identified the desire for a coronary artery bypass (CABG) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) simulation model for home practice. We aimed to develop and assess a portable, adjustable task trainer for cardiac surgical skills with high functional task alignment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intraoperative measurements were taken from patients undergoing elective CABG and AVR (N = 30). Measurements were taken in 3 axes and used to create a chest cavity that resembles the mediastinal constraints of a patient undergoing CABG and AVR. The task trainer is adjustable on the following 3 levels: (1) size of the incision, (2) depth of the chest, and (3) relative position of coronary artery or aortic valve model within the chest. Three groups (novices, intermediates, and experts) of cardiac surgery members evaluated the task trainer for functional task alignment and construct validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CABG and AVR model had high functional task alignment. There was a high satisfaction for both models and all participants would recommend the AVR and CABG model as an educational tool. Performance time significantly differed between the groups for both models (CABG: P = 0.032 and AVR: P = 0.001), as well as number of errors (CABG: P = 0.04 and AVR: P = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using real patient data, we were able to develop an adjustable task trainer for training principles of CABG and AVR. Our pilot study provides preliminary sources of evidence for validity and future study will look to assess transferability of skill to the operating room.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000753","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A recent needs assessment in Canadian cardiac surgery programs identified the desire for a coronary artery bypass (CABG) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) simulation model for home practice. We aimed to develop and assess a portable, adjustable task trainer for cardiac surgical skills with high functional task alignment.

Methods: Intraoperative measurements were taken from patients undergoing elective CABG and AVR (N = 30). Measurements were taken in 3 axes and used to create a chest cavity that resembles the mediastinal constraints of a patient undergoing CABG and AVR. The task trainer is adjustable on the following 3 levels: (1) size of the incision, (2) depth of the chest, and (3) relative position of coronary artery or aortic valve model within the chest. Three groups (novices, intermediates, and experts) of cardiac surgery members evaluated the task trainer for functional task alignment and construct validity.

Results: The CABG and AVR model had high functional task alignment. There was a high satisfaction for both models and all participants would recommend the AVR and CABG model as an educational tool. Performance time significantly differed between the groups for both models (CABG: P = 0.032 and AVR: P = 0.001), as well as number of errors (CABG: P = 0.04 and AVR: P = 0.043).

Conclusions: Using real patient data, we were able to develop an adjustable task trainer for training principles of CABG and AVR. Our pilot study provides preliminary sources of evidence for validity and future study will look to assess transferability of skill to the operating room.

一种新型、可调节的心脏外科技能任务训练器的评估。
引言:加拿大心脏外科项目最近的一项需求评估确定了对冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)和主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)模拟模型的需求。我们的目标是开发和评估一种便携式、可调节的任务训练器,用于心脏外科手术技能和高功能任务对齐。方法:对接受选择性CABG和AVR的患者(N=30)进行术中测量。在3个轴上进行测量,并用于创建一个类似于接受CABG和AVR的患者纵隔约束的胸腔。任务训练器可在以下3个级别上进行调整:(1)切口的大小,(2)胸部的深度,以及(3)冠状动脉或主动脉瓣模型在胸部的相对位置。三组(新手、中级和专家)的心脏外科成员评估了任务训练器的功能任务对齐和结构有效性。结果:CABG和AVR模型具有较高的功能任务一致性。两种模型都有很高的满意度,所有参与者都会推荐AVR和CABG模型作为一种教育工具。两种模型的组间表现时间(CABG:P=0.032和AVR:P=0.001)以及错误次数(CABG:P=0.04和AVR:P=0.043)存在显著差异。结论:使用真实的患者数据,我们能够开发出一种可调节的任务训练器来训练CABG和AVR的原理。我们的试点研究为有效性提供了初步证据来源,未来的研究将着眼于评估技能向手术室的可转移性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信