Reversal learning in those with early psychosis features contingency-dependent changes in loss response and learning.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-05 DOI:10.1080/13546805.2023.2259019
Andrea Baker, Shuichi Suetani, Peter Cosgrove, Dan Siskind, Graham K Murray, James G Scott, James P Kesby
{"title":"Reversal learning in those with early psychosis features contingency-dependent changes in loss response and learning.","authors":"Andrea Baker, Shuichi Suetani, Peter Cosgrove, Dan Siskind, Graham K Murray, James G Scott, James P Kesby","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2023.2259019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with psychotic disorders commonly feature broad decision-making impairments that impact their functional outcomes. Specific associative/reinforcement learning problems have been demonstrated in persistent psychosis. But these phenotypes may differ in early psychosis, suggesting that aspects of cognition decline over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present proof-of-concept study examined goal-directed action and reversal learning in controls and those with early psychosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Equivalent performance was observed between groups during outcome-specific devaluation, and reversal learning at an 80:20 contingency (reward probability for high:low targets). But when the low target reward probability was increased (80:40) those with early psychosis altered their response to loss, whereas controls did not. Computational modelling confirmed that in early psychosis there was a change in punishment learning that increased the chance of staying with the same stimulus after a loss, multiple trials into the future. In early psychosis, the magnitude of this response was greatest in those with higher IQ and lower clinical severity scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We show preliminary evidence that those with early psychosis present with a phenotype that includes altered responding to loss and hyper-adaptability in response to outcome changes. This may reflect a compensatory response to overcome the milieu of corticostriatal changes associated with psychotic disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"342-360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2023.2259019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: People with psychotic disorders commonly feature broad decision-making impairments that impact their functional outcomes. Specific associative/reinforcement learning problems have been demonstrated in persistent psychosis. But these phenotypes may differ in early psychosis, suggesting that aspects of cognition decline over time.

Methods: The present proof-of-concept study examined goal-directed action and reversal learning in controls and those with early psychosis.

Results: Equivalent performance was observed between groups during outcome-specific devaluation, and reversal learning at an 80:20 contingency (reward probability for high:low targets). But when the low target reward probability was increased (80:40) those with early psychosis altered their response to loss, whereas controls did not. Computational modelling confirmed that in early psychosis there was a change in punishment learning that increased the chance of staying with the same stimulus after a loss, multiple trials into the future. In early psychosis, the magnitude of this response was greatest in those with higher IQ and lower clinical severity scores.

Conclusions: We show preliminary evidence that those with early psychosis present with a phenotype that includes altered responding to loss and hyper-adaptability in response to outcome changes. This may reflect a compensatory response to overcome the milieu of corticostriatal changes associated with psychotic disorders.

早期精神病患者的反向学习表现为损失反应和学习的偶然性依赖性变化。
引言:患有精神病的人通常有广泛的决策障碍,这会影响他们的功能结果。特定的联想/强化学习问题已在持续性精神病中得到证实。但这些表型在早期精神病中可能有所不同,这表明认知方面会随着时间的推移而下降。方法:目前的概念验证研究检查了对照组和早期精神病患者的目标导向行动和反向学习。结果:在80:20偶然性(高:低目标的奖励概率)下,在特定于结果的贬值和反向学习期间,观察到两组之间的表现相当。但当低目标奖励概率增加时(80:40),早期精神病患者改变了对损失的反应,而对照组则没有。计算模型证实,在早期精神病患者中,惩罚学习发生了变化,这增加了在失去刺激后保持相同刺激的机会,未来将进行多次试验。在早期精神病中,智商较高、临床严重程度评分较低的人的这种反应程度最大。结论:我们有初步证据表明,早期精神病患者的表型包括对损失的反应改变和对结果变化的高度适应性。这可能反映了克服与精神病相关的皮质纹状体变化环境的补偿反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信