Not all lasers are the same: a scoping review evaluating laser therapy for vulvodynia.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Małgorzata Starzec-Proserpio, Marcela Grigol Bardin, Melanie Morin
{"title":"Not all lasers are the same: a scoping review evaluating laser therapy for vulvodynia.","authors":"Małgorzata Starzec-Proserpio, Marcela Grigol Bardin, Melanie Morin","doi":"10.1093/sxmrev/qead039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lasers are commonly used for treating various vaginal/vulvar conditions. To date, there is to our knowledge no available literature review on the effects of different types of lasers for the treatment of women with vulvodynia, a condition that causes chronic pain in the vulvar area.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to review the literature and summarize the existing published evidence regarding the effects of lasers for the treatment of women with vulvodynia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review with a systematic search was conducted that included studies investigating the use of laser treatment in women with vulvodynia. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools were used for the quality assessment. The type of laser, effects on pain and function, and participants' perceived improvement as well as adverse events were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies investigating laser therapy were included in the analysis: 1 randomized controlled trial, 5 before-after studies, 1 nonrandomized intervention study, and 1 case report. Several types of laser therapies were identified, ranging from mild noninvasive photobiomodulation to more invasive ablative procedures. Of the 6 studies that included pain outcomes, 3 studies showed statistically significant improvements from baseline to follow-up, and 3 demonstrated a reduction in pain from subjectively interpreted data. Similarly, each of the 2 studies investigating sexual function also reported an improvement (based only on subjective interpretation). Of the 2 studies with a comparison group, neither study was adequately powered to detect between-group differences. Furthermore, 57%-78% of participants reported improvement, with 1 study showing a greater statistically significant improvement in the low-level laser therapy patient group compared to the sham laser group. Outcomes and adverse events varied depending on the type of laser used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although these studies demonstrated some benefits of laser therapy for the treatment of vulvodynia, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the scarcity of the included studies that were robust and sufficiently powered. Future research should focus on conducting well-designed randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of different types of lasers in the treatment of vulvodynia.</p>","PeriodicalId":21813,"journal":{"name":"Sexual medicine reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual medicine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qead039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lasers are commonly used for treating various vaginal/vulvar conditions. To date, there is to our knowledge no available literature review on the effects of different types of lasers for the treatment of women with vulvodynia, a condition that causes chronic pain in the vulvar area.

Objectives: We sought to review the literature and summarize the existing published evidence regarding the effects of lasers for the treatment of women with vulvodynia.

Methods: A scoping review with a systematic search was conducted that included studies investigating the use of laser treatment in women with vulvodynia. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools were used for the quality assessment. The type of laser, effects on pain and function, and participants' perceived improvement as well as adverse events were analyzed.

Results: Eight studies investigating laser therapy were included in the analysis: 1 randomized controlled trial, 5 before-after studies, 1 nonrandomized intervention study, and 1 case report. Several types of laser therapies were identified, ranging from mild noninvasive photobiomodulation to more invasive ablative procedures. Of the 6 studies that included pain outcomes, 3 studies showed statistically significant improvements from baseline to follow-up, and 3 demonstrated a reduction in pain from subjectively interpreted data. Similarly, each of the 2 studies investigating sexual function also reported an improvement (based only on subjective interpretation). Of the 2 studies with a comparison group, neither study was adequately powered to detect between-group differences. Furthermore, 57%-78% of participants reported improvement, with 1 study showing a greater statistically significant improvement in the low-level laser therapy patient group compared to the sham laser group. Outcomes and adverse events varied depending on the type of laser used.

Conclusions: Although these studies demonstrated some benefits of laser therapy for the treatment of vulvodynia, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the scarcity of the included studies that were robust and sufficiently powered. Future research should focus on conducting well-designed randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of different types of lasers in the treatment of vulvodynia.

并非所有的激光都是一样的:一项评估激光治疗外阴炎的范围综述。
简介:激光通常用于治疗各种阴道/外阴疾病。到目前为止,据我们所知,还没有关于不同类型激光治疗女性外阴痛的效果的可用文献综述,外阴痛是一种导致外阴区域慢性疼痛的疾病。目的:我们试图回顾文献,并总结现有已发表的关于激光治疗女性外阴炎效果的证据。方法:通过系统检索进行范围界定审查,包括调查激光治疗女性外阴炎的研究。国家心肺血液研究所研究质量评估工具用于质量评估。分析了激光的类型、对疼痛和功能的影响、参与者的感知改善以及不良事件。结果:8项研究包括在分析中:1项随机对照试验,5项前后研究,1项非随机干预研究和1例病例报告。确定了几种类型的激光治疗,从轻度的无创光生物调制到更具侵入性的消融程序。在包括疼痛结果的6项研究中,3项研究显示从基线到随访有统计学上的显著改善,3项从主观解释的数据中显示疼痛减轻。同样,调查性功能的2项研究中的每一项都报告了改善(仅基于主观解释)。在与对照组的2项研究中,两项研究都没有足够的力量来检测组间的差异。此外,57%-78%的参与者报告了改善,其中一项研究显示,与假激光组相比,低水平激光治疗患者组的改善具有更大的统计学意义。结果和不良事件因使用的激光类型而异。结论:尽管这些研究证明了激光治疗外阴炎的一些益处,但鉴于纳入的研究缺乏有力和充分的证据,应谨慎解释这些发现。未来的研究应侧重于进行精心设计的随机对照试验,以评估不同类型激光治疗外阴炎的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual medicine reviews
Sexual medicine reviews UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信