Organizational Culture, Justice, Dehumanization and Affective Commitment in French Employees: A Serial Mediation Model.

IF 1.8 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Europes Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2023-08-31 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.5964/ejop.8243
Jean-Félix Hamel, Fabrizio Scrima, Lucie Massot, Benoît Montalan
{"title":"Organizational Culture, Justice, Dehumanization and Affective Commitment in French Employees: A Serial Mediation Model.","authors":"Jean-Félix Hamel,&nbsp;Fabrizio Scrima,&nbsp;Lucie Massot,&nbsp;Benoît Montalan","doi":"10.5964/ejop.8243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The instrumentality of employees can be considered a common feature of the modern workplace. To investigate the influence of this instrumentalizing culture on organizational performance on the individual level, we tested whether perceived clan values (according to the Competing Values Framework) could explain affective commitment directly and indirectly through perceptions of organizational justice and organizational dehumanization in employees. Using the PROCESS macro, we tested a corresponding serial mediation model in a convenience sample of 306 French employees. Although employees who perceived a lack of clan values were less committed, the observed indirect effect was greater. Our findings highlight the role of perceived organizational culture in influencing affective commitment and how perceived justice and dehumanization may explain part of this relationship. This research also contradicts widespread beliefs stating dehumanizing strategies are universally beneficial in terms of organizational efficiency. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47113,"journal":{"name":"Europes Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europes Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.8243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The instrumentality of employees can be considered a common feature of the modern workplace. To investigate the influence of this instrumentalizing culture on organizational performance on the individual level, we tested whether perceived clan values (according to the Competing Values Framework) could explain affective commitment directly and indirectly through perceptions of organizational justice and organizational dehumanization in employees. Using the PROCESS macro, we tested a corresponding serial mediation model in a convenience sample of 306 French employees. Although employees who perceived a lack of clan values were less committed, the observed indirect effect was greater. Our findings highlight the role of perceived organizational culture in influencing affective commitment and how perceived justice and dehumanization may explain part of this relationship. This research also contradicts widespread beliefs stating dehumanizing strategies are universally beneficial in terms of organizational efficiency. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

法国员工的组织文化、公正、非人性化和情感承诺:一个连续调解模型。
员工的工具性可以被认为是现代工作场所的一个共同特征。为了研究这种工具化文化在个人层面上对组织绩效的影响,我们测试了感知的宗族价值观(根据竞争价值观框架)是否可以通过员工对组织正义和组织非人化的感知直接或间接解释情感承诺。使用PROCESS宏,我们在306名法国员工的便利样本中测试了相应的串行中介模型。尽管认为缺乏家族价值观的员工不那么忠诚,但观察到的间接影响更大。我们的研究结果强调了感知的组织文化在影响情感承诺中的作用,以及感知的正义和非人化如何解释这种关系的一部分。这项研究也与普遍认为的非人化策略在组织效率方面普遍有益的观点相矛盾。讨论了未来研究的局限性和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europes Journal of Psychology
Europes Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信