Development and validation of the atopic dermatitis and infant skincare knowledge, attitude, and practice (ADISKAP 1.0) scale.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-04-12 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1002/ped4.12374
Xiaoyan Sun, Mutong Zhao, Qiong Wu, Jing Tian, Chunping Shen, Yuan Liang, Shan Wang, Lei Jiao, Yang Wang, Mingyi Liu, Lin Ma, Xiuhua Ma
{"title":"Development and validation of the atopic dermatitis and infant skincare knowledge, attitude, and practice (ADISKAP 1.0) scale.","authors":"Xiaoyan Sun, Mutong Zhao, Qiong Wu, Jing Tian, Chunping Shen, Yuan Liang, Shan Wang, Lei Jiao, Yang Wang, Mingyi Liu, Lin Ma, Xiuhua Ma","doi":"10.1002/ped4.12374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Preserving skin health is crucial for atopic dermatitis control as well as for the thriving of children. However, a well-developed and validated tool that measures the knowledge, attitude, and practice of skin care is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate the atopic dermatitis and infant skincare knowledge, attitude, and practice (ADISKAP 1.0) scale that measures parental health literacy on atopic dermatitis and skin care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a review of the literature, a focus group (two dermatologists and 12 parents), and a panel discussion in order to generate the ADISKAP prototype. Two samples of parents with knowingly superior (dermatologists, <i>n</i> = 59) and inferior (general population, <i>n</i> = 395) knowledge traits participated in the validation of ADISKAP. Cronbach's alpha was reported as a measure of internal consistency, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the test-retest validity. The known-groups technique was used to evaluate construct validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ADISKAP scale contained 17 items after content and face validity validation. After removing items that displayed poor test-retest reliability (<i>n</i> = 4) and construct validity (<i>n</i> = 3), 12 items were retained in the ADISKAP 1.0.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>ADISKAP 1.0 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing parental knowledge, attitude, and practice on infantile atopic dermatitis and skin care.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/25/76/PED4-7-153.PMC10509389.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12374","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Preserving skin health is crucial for atopic dermatitis control as well as for the thriving of children. However, a well-developed and validated tool that measures the knowledge, attitude, and practice of skin care is lacking.

Objective: To develop and validate the atopic dermatitis and infant skincare knowledge, attitude, and practice (ADISKAP 1.0) scale that measures parental health literacy on atopic dermatitis and skin care.

Methods: We conducted a review of the literature, a focus group (two dermatologists and 12 parents), and a panel discussion in order to generate the ADISKAP prototype. Two samples of parents with knowingly superior (dermatologists, n = 59) and inferior (general population, n = 395) knowledge traits participated in the validation of ADISKAP. Cronbach's alpha was reported as a measure of internal consistency, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the test-retest validity. The known-groups technique was used to evaluate construct validity.

Results: The ADISKAP scale contained 17 items after content and face validity validation. After removing items that displayed poor test-retest reliability (n = 4) and construct validity (n = 3), 12 items were retained in the ADISKAP 1.0.

Interpretation: ADISKAP 1.0 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing parental knowledge, attitude, and practice on infantile atopic dermatitis and skin care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

特应性皮炎和婴儿护肤知识、态度和实践(ADISKAP 1.0)量表的开发和验证。
重要性:保护皮肤健康对控制特应性皮炎以及儿童的健康至关重要。然而,缺乏一种完善和有效的工具来衡量皮肤护理的知识、态度和实践。目的:开发和验证用于测量父母对特应性皮炎和皮肤护理的健康知识的ADISKAP 1.0量表。方法:为了生成ADISKAP原型,我们进行了文献综述、焦点小组(两名皮肤科医生和12名家长)和小组讨论。两个具有知情优势(皮肤科医生,n=59)和劣势(普通人群,n=395)知识特征的父母样本参与了ADISKAP的验证。Cronbachα被报道为内部一致性的衡量标准,并计算组内相关系数(ICC)来评估重测的有效性。使用已知分组技术来评估结构的有效性。结果:ADISKAP量表经内容和面孔有效性验证,共包含17个项目。在删除了重测可靠性(n=4)和结构有效性(n=3)较差的项目后,ADISKAP 1.0中保留了12个项目。解释:ADISKAP 2.0是评估父母对婴儿特应性皮炎和皮肤护理的知识、态度和实践的可靠有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信