Psychotherapy Within Occupational Therapy Literature: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Carrie Anne Marshall, Michelle Murphy, Kristina Marchiori, Suliman Aryobi, Pam Wener, Catherine White, Nadine Larivière, Roxanne Isard, Avneet Chohan, Mary Forhan, Niki Kiepek, Skye Barbic, Victoria Sarunsky, Sandra Moll
{"title":"Psychotherapy Within Occupational Therapy Literature: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Carrie Anne Marshall,&nbsp;Michelle Murphy,&nbsp;Kristina Marchiori,&nbsp;Suliman Aryobi,&nbsp;Pam Wener,&nbsp;Catherine White,&nbsp;Nadine Larivière,&nbsp;Roxanne Isard,&nbsp;Avneet Chohan,&nbsp;Mary Forhan,&nbsp;Niki Kiepek,&nbsp;Skye Barbic,&nbsp;Victoria Sarunsky,&nbsp;Sandra Moll","doi":"10.1177/00084174221102732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Recent changes in the Canadian regulatory landscape have prompted reflections on the role and scope of occupational therapy in the provision of psychotherapy. <b>Purpose.</b> To document how psychotherapy has been explored in occupational therapy literature. <b>Method.</b> We conducted a scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines by searching eight databases (e.g., Medline, AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Sociological Abstracts, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses). Articles included at the full-text stage were subjected to a narrative synthesis. <b>Findings.</b> A total of 207 articles met the criteria for inclusion, spanning 93 years. 47.3% of these articles represented non-empirical literature, with only 14% representing effectiveness studies, suggesting that this body of literature remains in an early stage of development. <b>Implications.</b> Occupational therapists have been writing about and practicing psychotherapy for nearly a century, yet there remains an important opportunity to develop and evaluate occupation-based psychotherapy approaches. Effectiveness studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49097,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174221102732","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Recent changes in the Canadian regulatory landscape have prompted reflections on the role and scope of occupational therapy in the provision of psychotherapy. Purpose. To document how psychotherapy has been explored in occupational therapy literature. Method. We conducted a scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines by searching eight databases (e.g., Medline, AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Sociological Abstracts, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses). Articles included at the full-text stage were subjected to a narrative synthesis. Findings. A total of 207 articles met the criteria for inclusion, spanning 93 years. 47.3% of these articles represented non-empirical literature, with only 14% representing effectiveness studies, suggesting that this body of literature remains in an early stage of development. Implications. Occupational therapists have been writing about and practicing psychotherapy for nearly a century, yet there remains an important opportunity to develop and evaluate occupation-based psychotherapy approaches. Effectiveness studies are needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

职业治疗文献中的心理治疗:范围回顾。
背景。最近在加拿大监管格局的变化,促使反思的作用和范围的职业治疗在提供心理治疗。目的。记录心理治疗是如何在职业治疗文献中被探索的。方法。我们通过检索8个数据库(如Medline, AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Sociological Abstracts和ProQuest Dissertations & Theses),按照系统评价和元分析范围评价首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指南进行了范围评价。在全文阶段收录的文章进行了叙述综合。发现。共有207篇文章符合纳入标准,时间跨度为93年。这些文章中有47.3%为非实证文献,只有14%为有效性研究,这表明这类文献仍处于早期发展阶段。的影响。近一个世纪以来,职业治疗师一直在撰写和实践心理治疗,然而,发展和评估基于职业的心理治疗方法仍然有一个重要的机会。需要进行有效性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy was first published in September 1933. Since that time, it has fostered advancement and growth in occupational therapy scholarship. The mission of the journal is to provide a forum for leading-edge occupational therapy scholarship that advances theory, practice, research, and policy. The vision is to be a high-quality scholarly journal that is at the forefront of the science of occupational therapy and a destination journal for the top scholars in the field, globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信