The measurement of substance use disapproval: different information capacity of disapproval of licit and illicit psychoactive substances along a spectrum of substance use disapproval.

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica Pub Date : 2022-06-01
Zsolt Horvath, Anna Magi, Borbala Paksi, Zsolt Demetrovics, Katalin Felvinczi
{"title":"The measurement of substance use disapproval: different information capacity of disapproval of licit and illicit psychoactive substances along a spectrum of substance use disapproval.","authors":"Zsolt Horvath,&nbsp;Anna Magi,&nbsp;Borbala Paksi,&nbsp;Zsolt Demetrovics,&nbsp;Katalin Felvinczi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives: Approval/disapproval of substance use behavior might have a role in the development and persistence of substance use. However, less is known about the measurement function of disapproval of using different types of psychoactive substances. By using item response analyses, the present study aimed to examine the latent structure as well as item-level measurement properties of the construct of substance use disapproval. Methods: Nationally representative adult samples derived from the National Survey on Addiction Problems in Hungary from 2015 (N=2274) and 2019 (N=1385) were used in the present study. Dichotomous items measured the disapproval of eleven forms of substance use, such as smoking cigarettes, drinking alcohol and different forms of illicit drug use. Results: A unidimensional measurement model of substance use disapproval was supported. Item response analyses indicated that disapproval of alcohol use and cigarette smoking had moderate discrimination capacity and were located at moderately low-moderately high levels of the substance use disapproval continuum, whereas illicit substance use forms had high-very high discrimination capacities and were ranged at low-very low levels of the disapproval spectrum. Disapproval of experimenting with heroin, ecstasy and designer stimulants had the highest information capacity in 2015, whereas in 2019 disapproval of experimenting with synthetic cannabinoids and experimenting with and using occasionally cannabis were the most informative. Conclusions: Less permissive attitudes were shown for all forms of illicit drug use compared to alcohol and cigarette use. Discrimination and difficulty levels of disapproval of substance use might be associated with legal status of psychoactive substances.\n\n(Neuropsychopharmacol Hung 2022; 24(2): 85–94)</p>","PeriodicalId":39762,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica","volume":"24 2","pages":"85-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Approval/disapproval of substance use behavior might have a role in the development and persistence of substance use. However, less is known about the measurement function of disapproval of using different types of psychoactive substances. By using item response analyses, the present study aimed to examine the latent structure as well as item-level measurement properties of the construct of substance use disapproval. Methods: Nationally representative adult samples derived from the National Survey on Addiction Problems in Hungary from 2015 (N=2274) and 2019 (N=1385) were used in the present study. Dichotomous items measured the disapproval of eleven forms of substance use, such as smoking cigarettes, drinking alcohol and different forms of illicit drug use. Results: A unidimensional measurement model of substance use disapproval was supported. Item response analyses indicated that disapproval of alcohol use and cigarette smoking had moderate discrimination capacity and were located at moderately low-moderately high levels of the substance use disapproval continuum, whereas illicit substance use forms had high-very high discrimination capacities and were ranged at low-very low levels of the disapproval spectrum. Disapproval of experimenting with heroin, ecstasy and designer stimulants had the highest information capacity in 2015, whereas in 2019 disapproval of experimenting with synthetic cannabinoids and experimenting with and using occasionally cannabis were the most informative. Conclusions: Less permissive attitudes were shown for all forms of illicit drug use compared to alcohol and cigarette use. Discrimination and difficulty levels of disapproval of substance use might be associated with legal status of psychoactive substances. (Neuropsychopharmacol Hung 2022; 24(2): 85–94)

物质使用不赞成的测量:沿物质使用不赞成谱对合法和非法精神活性物质不赞成的不同信息能力。
目的:对物质使用行为的认可/不认可可能对物质使用的发展和持续存在有影响。然而,对不赞成使用不同类型精神活性物质的测量功能了解较少。本研究通过项目反应分析,探讨了物质使用不赞成的潜在结构和项目层面的测量特性。方法:本研究使用了2015年(N=2274)和2019年(N=1385)匈牙利全国成瘾问题调查中具有全国代表性的成人样本。二分类项目测量了11种物质使用的不赞成程度,如吸烟、饮酒和不同形式的非法药物使用。结果:建立了不赞成物质使用的单维测量模型。项目反应分析表明,对酒精使用和吸烟的不赞成具有中等辨别能力,位于物质使用不赞成连续谱的中低-中高水平,而非法物质使用形式具有高-非常高的辨别能力,位于不赞成谱的低-非常低水平。在2015年,反对使用海洛因、摇头丸和设计兴奋剂的信息容量最高,而在2019年,反对使用合成大麻素和偶尔使用大麻的信息容量最高。结论:与使用酒精和香烟相比,对所有形式的非法药物使用都表现出较不宽容的态度。对药物使用的歧视和不赞成程度可能与精神活性物质的法律地位有关。(神经精神药物,洪2022;24 (2): 85 - 94)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica
Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信