Domain-specific cognitive course in schizophrenia: Group- and individual-level changes over 10 years

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Camilla Bärthel Flaaten , Ingrid Melle , Thomas Bjella , Magnus Johan Engen , Gina Åsbø , Kristin Fjelnseth Wold , Line Widing , Erlend Gardsjord , Linn-Sofie Sæther , Merete Glenne Øie , Siv Hege Lyngstad , Beathe Haatveit , Carmen Simonsen , Torill Ueland
{"title":"Domain-specific cognitive course in schizophrenia: Group- and individual-level changes over 10 years","authors":"Camilla Bärthel Flaaten ,&nbsp;Ingrid Melle ,&nbsp;Thomas Bjella ,&nbsp;Magnus Johan Engen ,&nbsp;Gina Åsbø ,&nbsp;Kristin Fjelnseth Wold ,&nbsp;Line Widing ,&nbsp;Erlend Gardsjord ,&nbsp;Linn-Sofie Sæther ,&nbsp;Merete Glenne Øie ,&nbsp;Siv Hege Lyngstad ,&nbsp;Beathe Haatveit ,&nbsp;Carmen Simonsen ,&nbsp;Torill Ueland","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2022.100263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cognitive impairments in schizophrenia are well-documented, present across several cognitive domains and found to be relatively stable over time. However, there is a high degree of heterogeneity and indications of domain-specific developmental courses. The present study investigated the 10-year cognitive course in participants with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) and healthy controls on eight cognitive domains and a composite score, looking at group- and individual-level changes.</p><p>A total of 75 FES participants and 91 healthy controls underwent cognitive assessment at baseline and follow-up. Linear mixed models were used for group-level analyses and reliable change index (RCI) analyses were used to investigate individual change. The prevalence of clinically significant impairment was explored at both time points, using a cut-off of &lt; −1.5 SD, with significant cognitive impairment defined as impairment on ≥2 domains.</p><p>Group-level analyses found main effects of group and time, and time by group interactions. Memory, psychomotor processing speed and verbal fluency improved, while learning, mental processing speed and working memory were stable in both groups. FES participants showed deteriorations in attention and cognitive control. Individual-level analyses mainly indicated stability in both FES and controls, except for a higher prevalence of decline in cognitive control in FES. At baseline, 68.8 % of FES participants had clinically significant impairment, compared to 62.3 % at follow-up.</p><p>We mainly found long-term stability and modest increases in cognition over time in FES, as well as a high degree of within-group heterogeneity. We also found indications of deterioration in participants with worse cognitive performance at baseline.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9240854/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001322000282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Cognitive impairments in schizophrenia are well-documented, present across several cognitive domains and found to be relatively stable over time. However, there is a high degree of heterogeneity and indications of domain-specific developmental courses. The present study investigated the 10-year cognitive course in participants with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) and healthy controls on eight cognitive domains and a composite score, looking at group- and individual-level changes.

A total of 75 FES participants and 91 healthy controls underwent cognitive assessment at baseline and follow-up. Linear mixed models were used for group-level analyses and reliable change index (RCI) analyses were used to investigate individual change. The prevalence of clinically significant impairment was explored at both time points, using a cut-off of < −1.5 SD, with significant cognitive impairment defined as impairment on ≥2 domains.

Group-level analyses found main effects of group and time, and time by group interactions. Memory, psychomotor processing speed and verbal fluency improved, while learning, mental processing speed and working memory were stable in both groups. FES participants showed deteriorations in attention and cognitive control. Individual-level analyses mainly indicated stability in both FES and controls, except for a higher prevalence of decline in cognitive control in FES. At baseline, 68.8 % of FES participants had clinically significant impairment, compared to 62.3 % at follow-up.

We mainly found long-term stability and modest increases in cognition over time in FES, as well as a high degree of within-group heterogeneity. We also found indications of deterioration in participants with worse cognitive performance at baseline.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

精神分裂症的领域特异性认知过程:10年来群体和个人水平的变化
精神分裂症的认知障碍有充分的证据,存在于几个认知领域,并且随着时间的推移相对稳定。然而,存在高度的异质性和特定领域发展过程的迹象。本研究调查了首发精神分裂症(FES)参与者和健康对照者的10年认知过程,包括8个认知领域和一个综合评分,观察群体和个人水平的变化。共有75名FES参与者和91名健康对照者在基线和随访时接受了认知评估。群体水平分析采用线性混合模型,个体变化采用可靠变化指数(RCI)分析。在两个时间点探讨临床显著损伤的患病率,使用<−1.5 SD,有显著的认知障碍,定义为≥2个域的障碍。群体水平的分析发现了群体和时间的主要影响,以及群体相互作用的时间。两组患者的记忆、精神运动处理速度和语言流畅性均有所提高,而学习、心理处理速度和工作记忆均保持稳定。FES参与者在注意力和认知控制方面表现出恶化。个体水平分析主要表明,除了FES患者认知控制能力下降的发生率较高外,FES患者和对照组均表现稳定。基线时,68.8%的FES参与者有临床显著的损伤,而随访时为62.3%。我们主要发现了FES的长期稳定性和随着时间的推移认知能力的适度增加,以及高度的组内异质性。我们还发现在基线时认知表现较差的参与者有恶化的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信