The Relation Between Empathy and Aggression: The Role of Attachment Style.

IF 1.8 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Europes Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2022-08-31 eCollection Date: 2022-08-01 DOI:10.5964/ejop.4509
Maria Grazia Lo Cricchio, Pasquale Musso, Alida Lo Coco, Rosalinda Cassibba, Francesca Liga
{"title":"The Relation Between Empathy and Aggression: The Role of Attachment Style.","authors":"Maria Grazia Lo Cricchio,&nbsp;Pasquale Musso,&nbsp;Alida Lo Coco,&nbsp;Rosalinda Cassibba,&nbsp;Francesca Liga","doi":"10.5964/ejop.4509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to examine the explaining and moderating role of attachment style profiles on the association between empathy and aggression. Participants were 548 Italian adults (M = 47.62 years, SD = 6.14) who completed a survey measuring attachment, empathy, and aggression. Using cluster analytic methods, initial results indicated two attachment style profiles to be considered (secure vs. insecure). However, we also extracted a more theoretically guided four-cluster solution including preoccupied, secure, fearful, and dismissing profiles. Moreover, structural equation modelling showed that higher levels of empathy linked to lower levels of aggression. Nonetheless, when introducing in the model the dichotomous or the multi-categorical attachment style profile variable as predictive of both empathy and aggression, their association became not significant, while secure attachment profile significantly presented higher levels of empathy and lower levels of aggression compared to the other profiles. Furthermore, attachment style profile moderated the link between empathy and aggression. Specifically, in the secure group empathy and aggression were negatively related, but no significant association was evidenced in the other groups. Findings are discussed in the light of the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":47113,"journal":{"name":"Europes Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632554/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europes Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.4509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the explaining and moderating role of attachment style profiles on the association between empathy and aggression. Participants were 548 Italian adults (M = 47.62 years, SD = 6.14) who completed a survey measuring attachment, empathy, and aggression. Using cluster analytic methods, initial results indicated two attachment style profiles to be considered (secure vs. insecure). However, we also extracted a more theoretically guided four-cluster solution including preoccupied, secure, fearful, and dismissing profiles. Moreover, structural equation modelling showed that higher levels of empathy linked to lower levels of aggression. Nonetheless, when introducing in the model the dichotomous or the multi-categorical attachment style profile variable as predictive of both empathy and aggression, their association became not significant, while secure attachment profile significantly presented higher levels of empathy and lower levels of aggression compared to the other profiles. Furthermore, attachment style profile moderated the link between empathy and aggression. Specifically, in the secure group empathy and aggression were negatively related, but no significant association was evidenced in the other groups. Findings are discussed in the light of the literature.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

共情与攻击的关系:依恋类型的作用。
本研究旨在探讨依恋类型在共情与攻击关系中的解释和调节作用。参与者是548名意大利成年人(M = 47.62岁,SD = 6.14),他们完成了一项测量依恋、同理心和攻击性的调查。使用聚类分析方法,初始结果表明需要考虑两种附件样式配置文件(安全与不安全)。然而,我们也提取了一个更具理论指导意义的四集群解决方案,包括占用、安全、恐惧和解雇配置文件。此外,结构方程模型显示,同理心水平越高,攻击性水平越低。然而,当在模型中引入二分类或多分类依恋类型变量作为共情和攻击的预测变量时,它们之间的关联变得不显著,而安全依恋类型与其他类型相比显著表现出更高水平的共情和更低水平的攻击。此外,依恋类型对共情与攻击之间的关系有调节作用。在安全组中,共情与攻击行为呈负相关,而在其他组中无显著相关。根据文献讨论了研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europes Journal of Psychology
Europes Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
31 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信