Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity and cognitive function in adults with schizophrenia

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Ivanka Veleva , Kaloyan Stoychev , Maya Stoimenova-Popova , Lyudmil Stoyanov , Eleonora Mineva-Dimitrova , Ivelin Angelov
{"title":"Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity and cognitive function in adults with schizophrenia","authors":"Ivanka Veleva ,&nbsp;Kaloyan Stoychev ,&nbsp;Maya Stoimenova-Popova ,&nbsp;Lyudmil Stoyanov ,&nbsp;Eleonora Mineva-Dimitrova ,&nbsp;Ivelin Angelov","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2022.100269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and methods</h3><p>Based on the limited research focusing on the severity of cognitive deterioration in schizophrenia with preceding toxoplasmosis, we sampled 89 demographically matched paranoid schizophrenia patients (mean age 38.97 years) with (n = 42) and without (n = 47) seroprevalence of IgG type anti <em>T. gondii</em> antibodies as marker of past infection. They underwent examination of verbal memory (10 words Luria test), logical memory and visual memory (BVRT), processing speed (TMT-A/DSST) and executive functions (TMT-B/verbal fluency). We compared the results of both groups, taking into account the normative values for the Bulgarian population where available. We also compared the two groups in terms of clinical severity as evidenced by positive, negative and disorganization sub-scores of the PANSS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>While both groups were expectedly under the population norms for verbal and logical memory, seropositive patients showed significantly bigger impairment in verbal memory (Luria Smax = 72.85 vs 78.51; p = 0.029), psychomotor speed (TMT-A 50.98 s vs 44.64 s; p = 0.017), semantic verbal fluency (27.12 vs 30.02; p = 0.011) and literal verbal fluency (17.17 vs 18.78; p = 0.014) compared to the seronegative ones. In addition to that, they gave less correct answers on the BVRT (2.98 vs 4.09; p = 0.006) while making markedly more errors (13.95 vs 10.21; p = 0.002). Despite not reaching statistical significance, past toxoplasmosis was associated with higher score on the PANSS disorganization sub-scale (16.50 points vs 14.72 points) and with lower educational attainment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results suggest a more profound neuropathological insult(s) resulting in greater cognitive impairment in schizophrenia cases that are exposed to <em>T. gondii</em> infection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c8/e6/main.PMC9440062.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001322000348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction and methods

Based on the limited research focusing on the severity of cognitive deterioration in schizophrenia with preceding toxoplasmosis, we sampled 89 demographically matched paranoid schizophrenia patients (mean age 38.97 years) with (n = 42) and without (n = 47) seroprevalence of IgG type anti T. gondii antibodies as marker of past infection. They underwent examination of verbal memory (10 words Luria test), logical memory and visual memory (BVRT), processing speed (TMT-A/DSST) and executive functions (TMT-B/verbal fluency). We compared the results of both groups, taking into account the normative values for the Bulgarian population where available. We also compared the two groups in terms of clinical severity as evidenced by positive, negative and disorganization sub-scores of the PANSS.

Results

While both groups were expectedly under the population norms for verbal and logical memory, seropositive patients showed significantly bigger impairment in verbal memory (Luria Smax = 72.85 vs 78.51; p = 0.029), psychomotor speed (TMT-A 50.98 s vs 44.64 s; p = 0.017), semantic verbal fluency (27.12 vs 30.02; p = 0.011) and literal verbal fluency (17.17 vs 18.78; p = 0.014) compared to the seronegative ones. In addition to that, they gave less correct answers on the BVRT (2.98 vs 4.09; p = 0.006) while making markedly more errors (13.95 vs 10.21; p = 0.002). Despite not reaching statistical significance, past toxoplasmosis was associated with higher score on the PANSS disorganization sub-scale (16.50 points vs 14.72 points) and with lower educational attainment.

Conclusion

Our results suggest a more profound neuropathological insult(s) resulting in greater cognitive impairment in schizophrenia cases that are exposed to T. gondii infection.

成人精神分裂症患者刚地弓形虫血清阳性与认知功能
介绍和方法基于对有弓形虫病病史的精神分裂症患者认知功能恶化严重程度的有限研究,我们抽样了89例人口统计学匹配的偏执型精神分裂症患者(平均年龄38.97岁),其中(n = 42)和(n = 47)血清IgG型抗弓形虫抗体阳性率作为既往感染的标记。对他们进行了言语记忆(10个单词Luria测试)、逻辑记忆和视觉记忆(BVRT)、处理速度(TMT-A/DSST)和执行功能(TMT-B/言语流畅性)的测试。我们比较了两组的结果,考虑到保加利亚人口的规范性值。我们还比较了两组的临床严重程度,以PANSS的阳性、阴性和紊乱分值为证据。结果两组患者的语言和逻辑记忆均符合人群标准,但血清阳性患者的语言记忆损伤明显更大(Luria Smax = 72.85 vs 78.51;p = 0.029),精神运动速度(TMT-A 50.98 s vs 44.64 s;P = 0.017),语义语言流畅性(27.12 vs 30.02;P = 0.011)和字面语言流畅性(17.17 vs 18.78;P = 0.014)。除此之外,他们在BVRT上给出的正确答案也更少(2.98比4.09;P = 0.006),但错误率明显更高(13.95 vs 10.21;p = 0.002)。尽管没有达到统计学意义,但过去弓形虫病与PANSS紊乱子量表得分较高(16.50分对14.72分)和受教育程度较低相关。结论我们的研究结果表明,暴露于弓形虫感染的精神分裂症患者有更严重的神经病理损伤,导致更大的认知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信