Is bilingualism associated with a lower risk of dementia in community-living older adults? Cross-sectional and prospective analyses.

Caleb M Yeung, Philip D St John, Verena Menec, Suzanne L Tyas
{"title":"Is bilingualism associated with a lower risk of dementia in community-living older adults? Cross-sectional and prospective analyses.","authors":"Caleb M Yeung,&nbsp;Philip D St John,&nbsp;Verena Menec,&nbsp;Suzanne L Tyas","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine whether bilingualism is associated with dementia in cross-sectional or prospective analyses of older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 1991, 1616 community-living older adults were assessed and were followed 5 years later. Measures included age, sex, education, subjective memory loss (SML), and the modified Mini-mental State Examination (3MS). Dementia was determined by clinical examination in those who scored below the cut point on the 3MS. Language status was categorized based upon self-report into 3 groups: English as a first language (monolingual English, bilingual English) and English as a Second Language (ESL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ESL category had lower education, lower 3MS scores, more SML, and were more likely to be diagnosed with cognitive impairment, no dementia at both time 1 and time 2 compared with those speaking English as a first language. There was no association between being bilingual (ESL and bilingual English vs. monolingual) and having dementia at time 1 in bivariate or multivariate analyses. In those who were cognitively intact at time 1, there was no association between being bilingual and having dementia at time 2 in bivariate or multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find any association between speaking >1 language and dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":520551,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer disease and associated disorders","volume":" ","pages":"326-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000019","citationCount":"75","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer disease and associated disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether bilingualism is associated with dementia in cross-sectional or prospective analyses of older adults.

Methods: In 1991, 1616 community-living older adults were assessed and were followed 5 years later. Measures included age, sex, education, subjective memory loss (SML), and the modified Mini-mental State Examination (3MS). Dementia was determined by clinical examination in those who scored below the cut point on the 3MS. Language status was categorized based upon self-report into 3 groups: English as a first language (monolingual English, bilingual English) and English as a Second Language (ESL).

Results: The ESL category had lower education, lower 3MS scores, more SML, and were more likely to be diagnosed with cognitive impairment, no dementia at both time 1 and time 2 compared with those speaking English as a first language. There was no association between being bilingual (ESL and bilingual English vs. monolingual) and having dementia at time 1 in bivariate or multivariate analyses. In those who were cognitively intact at time 1, there was no association between being bilingual and having dementia at time 2 in bivariate or multivariate analyses.

Conclusions: We did not find any association between speaking >1 language and dementia.

在社区生活的老年人中,双语与较低的痴呆风险有关吗?横断面和前瞻性分析。
目的:本研究的目的是在老年人的横断面或前瞻性分析中确定双语是否与痴呆有关。方法:1991年对1616名社区生活老年人进行评估,并在5年后进行随访。测量包括年龄、性别、教育程度、主观记忆丧失(SML)和改进的简易精神状态检查(3MS)。在3MS评分低于切点的患者中,痴呆是通过临床检查确定的。语言状况根据自我报告分为三组:英语作为第一语言(单语英语,双语英语)和英语作为第二语言(ESL)。结果:与以英语为第一语言的人相比,ESL组的受教育程度较低,3MS分数较低,SML更多,更有可能被诊断为认知障碍,在第一次和第二次都没有痴呆。在双变量或多变量分析中,双语(ESL和双语英语与单语言)与在第1时刻患痴呆之间没有关联。双变量或多变量分析显示,在第一阶段认知完整的受试者中,会说两种语言与第二阶段痴呆之间没有关联。结论:我们没有发现说>1种语言和痴呆之间有任何关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信