The fabricated past: intentionally fabricated autobiographical memories in Alzheimer's disease.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-07 DOI:10.1080/13546805.2022.2036114
Mohamad El Haj, Frédérique Robin
{"title":"The fabricated past: intentionally fabricated autobiographical memories in Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Mohamad El Haj,&nbsp;Frédérique Robin","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2022.2036114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated intentionally fabricated autobiographical memories in Alzheimer's Disease (AD).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We invited AD patients and control participants to construct real events as well as fabricated events describing fictitious personal events that occurred in the past.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results demonstrated slower retrieval time for intentionally fabricated memories than for real ones in both AD patients and control participants. The analysis also showed similar vividness for intentionally fabricated memories and real ones in AD patients but lower vividness for intentionally fabricated memories than for real ones in control participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The slow retrieval time of intentionally fabricated memories may be attributed to the cognitive effort required to retrieve elements from autobiographical memory and edit them to construct a new memory. We suggest that the vividness of intentionally fabricated memories observed in AD may induce confusion with real memories. In addition to the experimental approach of our study, we offer a theoretical rationale for intentionally fabricated autobiographical memories by situating them in the wider context of different facets of false memories in AD (e.g. confabulations, source monitoring errors).</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":"27 4","pages":"273-288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2022.2036114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We investigated intentionally fabricated autobiographical memories in Alzheimer's Disease (AD).

Method: We invited AD patients and control participants to construct real events as well as fabricated events describing fictitious personal events that occurred in the past.

Results: Results demonstrated slower retrieval time for intentionally fabricated memories than for real ones in both AD patients and control participants. The analysis also showed similar vividness for intentionally fabricated memories and real ones in AD patients but lower vividness for intentionally fabricated memories than for real ones in control participants.

Conclusions: The slow retrieval time of intentionally fabricated memories may be attributed to the cognitive effort required to retrieve elements from autobiographical memory and edit them to construct a new memory. We suggest that the vividness of intentionally fabricated memories observed in AD may induce confusion with real memories. In addition to the experimental approach of our study, we offer a theoretical rationale for intentionally fabricated autobiographical memories by situating them in the wider context of different facets of false memories in AD (e.g. confabulations, source monitoring errors).

捏造的过去:阿尔茨海默氏症患者故意捏造的自传式记忆。
目的:探讨阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者故意编造的自传体记忆。方法:邀请AD患者和对照组参与者构建真实事件和虚构事件,虚构事件描述过去发生的个人事件。结果:结果表明,在阿尔茨海默病患者和对照组中,有意编造的记忆比真实记忆的恢复时间要慢。分析还显示,阿尔茨海默病患者有意编造的记忆与真实记忆的生动性相似,但对照组参与者有意编造的记忆的生动性低于真实记忆。结论:故意编造记忆的提取时间较慢可能是由于从自传体记忆中提取元素并编辑它们以构建新记忆需要认知努力。我们认为在AD中观察到的故意编造的记忆的生动性可能会导致与真实记忆的混淆。除了我们研究的实验方法外,我们还通过将故意编造的自传式记忆置于AD中错误记忆的不同方面的更广泛背景中(例如虚构,源监测错误),为故意编造的自传式记忆提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信