The Role of COVID-19, Race and Social Factors in Pregnancy Experiences in New York State: The CAP Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-08 DOI:10.1080/08964289.2021.1997893
Diana Romero, Meredith Manze, Dari Goldman, Glen Johnson
{"title":"The Role of COVID-19, Race and Social Factors in Pregnancy Experiences in New York State: The CAP Study.","authors":"Diana Romero,&nbsp;Meredith Manze,&nbsp;Dari Goldman,&nbsp;Glen Johnson","doi":"10.1080/08964289.2021.1997893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given that New York State's (NYS) was the first epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States (US), we were interested in potential racial/ethnic differences in pregnancy-related experiences among women pregnant during versus prior to the pandemic. We surveyed 1,525 women (18-44 years) proportionate to geographic and sociodemographic distribution between June 9, 20 and July 21, 20. We carried out bivariate analysis of various social and pregnancy-related factors by racial/ethnic identity (White, Black, Hispanic) and binary logistic and linear regression assessing the association between race/ethnicity, pregnancy prior to/during the pandemic, demographic characteristics, health and social wellbeing, and employment as an essential worker with pregnancy-related healthcare delays and changes. Overall, Black and Hispanic women were significantly more likely to experience a host of negative prenatal and postpartum experiences. In general, multivariate analyses revealed that individuals who were pregnant during the pandemic, lived in NYC, participated in social welfare programs, lacked health insurance, and/or were essential workers were more likely to report delays in prenatal and postpartum care and/or more changes/negative experiences. In light of previous evidence of racial disparities in birth experiences, the higher rates of negative pregnancy/birth-care and postpartum/newborn-care experiences among Black and Hispanic women in bivariate analysis warrant further inspection given that their aggregation for multivariate analysis may have obscured differences at the level of individual events. Findings support continued efforts for universal health insurance and improved social welfare programs. Guidelines are needed to protect essential workers' access to health services, particularly related to pregnancy given the time-sensitive nature of this care.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2021.1997893 .</p>","PeriodicalId":55395,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Medicine","volume":"48 2","pages":"120-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2021.1997893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Given that New York State's (NYS) was the first epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States (US), we were interested in potential racial/ethnic differences in pregnancy-related experiences among women pregnant during versus prior to the pandemic. We surveyed 1,525 women (18-44 years) proportionate to geographic and sociodemographic distribution between June 9, 20 and July 21, 20. We carried out bivariate analysis of various social and pregnancy-related factors by racial/ethnic identity (White, Black, Hispanic) and binary logistic and linear regression assessing the association between race/ethnicity, pregnancy prior to/during the pandemic, demographic characteristics, health and social wellbeing, and employment as an essential worker with pregnancy-related healthcare delays and changes. Overall, Black and Hispanic women were significantly more likely to experience a host of negative prenatal and postpartum experiences. In general, multivariate analyses revealed that individuals who were pregnant during the pandemic, lived in NYC, participated in social welfare programs, lacked health insurance, and/or were essential workers were more likely to report delays in prenatal and postpartum care and/or more changes/negative experiences. In light of previous evidence of racial disparities in birth experiences, the higher rates of negative pregnancy/birth-care and postpartum/newborn-care experiences among Black and Hispanic women in bivariate analysis warrant further inspection given that their aggregation for multivariate analysis may have obscured differences at the level of individual events. Findings support continued efforts for universal health insurance and improved social welfare programs. Guidelines are needed to protect essential workers' access to health services, particularly related to pregnancy given the time-sensitive nature of this care.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2021.1997893 .

COVID-19、种族和社会因素在纽约州怀孕经历中的作用:CAP研究
鉴于纽约州是美国COVID-19大流行的第一个震中,我们对在大流行期间和之前怀孕的妇女在怀孕相关经历方面的潜在种族/民族差异感兴趣。在20年6月9日至7月21日期间,我们调查了1525名女性(18-44岁),与地理和社会人口分布成比例。我们通过种族/民族身份(白人、黑人、西班牙裔)对各种社会和妊娠相关因素进行了双变量分析,并进行了二元逻辑回归和线性回归,评估种族/民族、大流行前/期间的妊娠、人口统计学特征、健康和社会福利以及作为基本工作者的就业与妊娠相关的医疗保健延迟和变化之间的关系。总体而言,黑人和西班牙裔女性更有可能经历一系列负面的产前和产后经历。总的来说,多变量分析显示,在大流行期间怀孕、住在纽约、参加社会福利计划、缺乏医疗保险和/或必不可少的工作人员更有可能报告产前和产后护理的延误和/或更多的变化/负面经历。根据之前关于生育经历中种族差异的证据,在双变量分析中,黑人和西班牙裔妇女中较高的孕期/分娩护理和产后/新生儿护理经历率值得进一步检查,因为它们的多变量分析汇总可能掩盖了个体事件水平上的差异。调查结果支持继续为全民健康保险和改善社会福利计划而努力。需要制定准则,以保护基本工作人员获得保健服务,特别是与怀孕有关的保健服务,因为这种护理具有时间敏感性。本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2021.1997893上在线获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Medicine
Behavioral Medicine 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, which fosters and promotes the exchange of knowledge and the advancement of theory in the field of behavioral medicine, including but not limited to understandings of disease prevention, health promotion, health disparities, identification of health risk factors, and interventions designed to reduce health risks, ameliorate health disparities, enhancing all aspects of health. The journal seeks to advance knowledge and theory in these domains in all segments of the population and across the lifespan, in local, national, and global contexts, and with an emphasis on the synergies that exist between biological, psychological, psychosocial, and structural factors as they related to these areas of study and across health states. Behavioral Medicine publishes original empirical studies (experimental and observational research studies, quantitative and qualitative studies, evaluation studies) as well as clinical/case studies. The journal also publishes review articles, which provide systematic evaluations of the literature and propose alternative and innovative theoretical paradigms, as well as brief reports and responses to articles previously published in Behavioral Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信