Supportive leadership training effects on employee social and hedonic well-being: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

IF 5.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Maie Stein, Marlies Schümann, Friederike Teetzen, Sabine Gregersen, Vanessa Begemann, Sylvie Vincent-Höper
{"title":"Supportive leadership training effects on employee social and hedonic well-being: A cluster randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Maie Stein,&nbsp;Marlies Schümann,&nbsp;Friederike Teetzen,&nbsp;Sabine Gregersen,&nbsp;Vanessa Begemann,&nbsp;Sylvie Vincent-Höper","doi":"10.1037/ocp0000300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drawing on conservation of resources theory, we developed and evaluated a supportive leadership training (SLT) intervention designed to teach leaders ways to be supportive of their employees. Given the important role of supportive leaders in helping employees deal with excessive workloads, we theorized that the beneficial intervention effects on employee well-being would be particularly evident for employees who perceive higher levels of quantitative and qualitative workloads prior to the intervention. Using a cluster randomized controlled field trial, we tested the effects of the SLT on employee social well-being in terms of leader-member exchange (LMX) quality and employee hedonic well-being, including positive affective well-being, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. The participants in the training were directors of childcare centers in Germany. To rigorously evaluate the intervention effects at the employee level, we collected survey data at baseline, 1 month postintervention, and 6 months postintervention, and we used an intent-to-treat approach to analyze the data. A total of 496 employees from 77 childcare centers provided data at baseline, of whom 266 and 226 employees participated in the 1-month and 6-month surveys, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models showed that the effectiveness of the intervention in terms of LMX quality and emotional exhaustion varied depending on the employees' baseline perceptions of quantitative workloads, such that employees with higher quantitative workloads benefited more from the SLT. The findings of this study improve the understanding of the types of outcomes of SLT and contribute to clarifying for whom SLT is effective. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","volume":"26 6","pages":"599-612"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000300","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Drawing on conservation of resources theory, we developed and evaluated a supportive leadership training (SLT) intervention designed to teach leaders ways to be supportive of their employees. Given the important role of supportive leaders in helping employees deal with excessive workloads, we theorized that the beneficial intervention effects on employee well-being would be particularly evident for employees who perceive higher levels of quantitative and qualitative workloads prior to the intervention. Using a cluster randomized controlled field trial, we tested the effects of the SLT on employee social well-being in terms of leader-member exchange (LMX) quality and employee hedonic well-being, including positive affective well-being, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. The participants in the training were directors of childcare centers in Germany. To rigorously evaluate the intervention effects at the employee level, we collected survey data at baseline, 1 month postintervention, and 6 months postintervention, and we used an intent-to-treat approach to analyze the data. A total of 496 employees from 77 childcare centers provided data at baseline, of whom 266 and 226 employees participated in the 1-month and 6-month surveys, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models showed that the effectiveness of the intervention in terms of LMX quality and emotional exhaustion varied depending on the employees' baseline perceptions of quantitative workloads, such that employees with higher quantitative workloads benefited more from the SLT. The findings of this study improve the understanding of the types of outcomes of SLT and contribute to clarifying for whom SLT is effective. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

支持性领导培训对员工社会和享乐幸福感的影响:一项随机对照试验。
根据资源保护理论,我们开发并评估了一种支持性领导培训(SLT)干预方法,旨在教会领导者如何支持员工。鉴于支持性领导者在帮助员工处理过度工作量方面的重要作用,我们从理论上认为,对于那些在干预前感知到更高水平的定量和定性工作量的员工来说,有益的干预对员工幸福感的影响尤为明显。本研究采用聚类随机对照实地试验,从领导-成员交换(LMX)质量和员工享乐幸福感(包括积极情感幸福感、情绪耗散和工作满意度)三个方面检验了SLT对员工社会幸福感的影响。参加培训的是德国托儿中心的负责人。为了严格评估员工层面的干预效果,我们收集了基线、干预后1个月和干预后6个月的调查数据,并采用意向治疗方法对数据进行分析。共有来自77个托儿中心的496名员工提供了基线数据,其中266名和226名员工分别参加了为期1个月和6个月的调查。线性混合效应模型显示,员工对量化工作负荷的基线认知不同,对工作体验质量和情绪耗竭的干预效果也不同,量化工作负荷高的员工从工作体验中获益更多。本研究的发现提高了对SLT结果类型的理解,并有助于澄清SLT对哪些人有效。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Occupational Health Psychology offers research, theory, and public policy articles in occupational health psychology, an interdisciplinary field representing a broad range of backgrounds, interests, and specializations. Occupational health psychology concerns the application of psychology to improving the quality of work life and to protecting and promoting the safety, health, and well-being of workers. This journal focuses on the work environment, the individual, and the work-family interface.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信