The double-edged sword of manager caring behavior: Implications for employee wellbeing.

IF 5.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Janet A Boekhorst, Rebecca Hewett, Amanda Shantz, Jessica R L Good
{"title":"The double-edged sword of manager caring behavior: Implications for employee wellbeing.","authors":"Janet A Boekhorst,&nbsp;Rebecca Hewett,&nbsp;Amanda Shantz,&nbsp;Jessica R L Good","doi":"10.1037/ocp0000313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While managers play a critical role in supporting employee wellbeing, prior research suggests that doing so can take a toll on managers themselves. However, we know little about the potential implications of this for employees. Drawing from the leadership-wellbeing literature and social psychological theories of guilt, we propose that manager caring behavior is associated with both positive (vitality) and negative (guilt) employee wellbeing. We find support for these relationships in Study 1 (N = 264) with a time-separated survey. In Study 2, we replicate these findings, and in addition, we examine a negative perceptual response to manager care: employee-rated manager role overload. Drawing on perceptual salience research, we propose that the negative relationship between manager care and employee-rated manager role overload is exacerbated in a team environment where employees fail to care for each other (i.e., a weak caring climate). Study 2 (N = 360) largely supports our hypotheses with multilevel, time-separated field data. The findings suggest that managers should not be expected to \"go it alone\" to support employee wellbeing because doing so may relate negatively to employee outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","volume":"26 6","pages":"507-521"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000313","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

While managers play a critical role in supporting employee wellbeing, prior research suggests that doing so can take a toll on managers themselves. However, we know little about the potential implications of this for employees. Drawing from the leadership-wellbeing literature and social psychological theories of guilt, we propose that manager caring behavior is associated with both positive (vitality) and negative (guilt) employee wellbeing. We find support for these relationships in Study 1 (N = 264) with a time-separated survey. In Study 2, we replicate these findings, and in addition, we examine a negative perceptual response to manager care: employee-rated manager role overload. Drawing on perceptual salience research, we propose that the negative relationship between manager care and employee-rated manager role overload is exacerbated in a team environment where employees fail to care for each other (i.e., a weak caring climate). Study 2 (N = 360) largely supports our hypotheses with multilevel, time-separated field data. The findings suggest that managers should not be expected to "go it alone" to support employee wellbeing because doing so may relate negatively to employee outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

管理者关怀行为的双刃剑:对员工幸福感的影响。
虽然管理者在支持员工幸福感方面发挥着关键作用,但之前的研究表明,这样做可能会对管理者自己造成伤害。然而,我们对这对员工的潜在影响知之甚少。根据领导力-幸福感文献和内疚的社会心理学理论,我们提出管理者关怀行为与员工的积极(活力)和消极(内疚)幸福感相关。我们在研究1 (N = 264)中通过时间间隔调查发现了这些关系的支持。在研究2中,我们复制了这些发现,此外,我们检查了对经理关怀的负面感知反应:员工评价的经理角色过载。根据感知显著性研究,我们提出,在员工无法相互关心的团队环境中(即弱关怀氛围),管理者关心与员工评价的管理者角色过载之间的负向关系会加剧。研究2 (N = 360)在很大程度上支持了我们的假设,采用了多层次、时间分离的现场数据。研究结果表明,不应指望管理者“单干”来支持员工的福利,因为这样做可能会对员工的工作成果产生负面影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Occupational Health Psychology offers research, theory, and public policy articles in occupational health psychology, an interdisciplinary field representing a broad range of backgrounds, interests, and specializations. Occupational health psychology concerns the application of psychology to improving the quality of work life and to protecting and promoting the safety, health, and well-being of workers. This journal focuses on the work environment, the individual, and the work-family interface.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信