The effect of audio-support on strategy, time, and performance on reading comprehension in secondary school students with dyslexia

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
C. A. N. Knoop-van Campen, D. ter Doest, L. Verhoeven, E. Segers
{"title":"The effect of audio-support on strategy, time, and performance on reading comprehension in secondary school students with dyslexia","authors":"C. A. N. Knoop-van Campen,&nbsp;D. ter Doest,&nbsp;L. Verhoeven,&nbsp;E. Segers","doi":"10.1007/s11881-021-00246-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of adequate reading comprehension strategies is important to read efficiently. Students with dyslexia not only read slower and less accurately, they also use fewer reading comprehension strategies. To compensate for their decoding problems, they often receive audio-support (narration written text). However, audio-support linearly guides readers from beginning to end through texts, possibly hindering the use of reading comprehension strategies in expository texts and negatively impacting reading time and reading comprehension performance. We examined to what extent audio-support affects reading comprehension strategies, reading times, and reading comprehension performance in 21 secondary school students with dyslexia and 22 typically developing controls. Participants were provided with three types of assignments (summarizing, open-ended questions, statement questions) in each condition (written text with and without audio-support). SMI RED-500 eye tracker captured eye movements during reading. The standard deviation of the weighted fixation duration times on the three paragraphs was considered indicative of the disparity of readers’ attention within the text. Following a discrimination based on experts’ reading behavior and hand-coded validation, these scores visualized whether students used the intensive reading strategy (reading whole text) or selective reading strategy (focusing on part of the text). In open-ended assignments, students divided their attention more over the whole text instead of focusing on one specific part when audio was added. In addition, audio-support increased reading time in students with and without dyslexia in most tasks, while in neither of the tasks audio-support affected reading comprehension performance. Audio-support impacts reading comprehension strategy and reading time in all students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"72 2","pages":"341 - 360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11881-021-00246-w.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-021-00246-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The use of adequate reading comprehension strategies is important to read efficiently. Students with dyslexia not only read slower and less accurately, they also use fewer reading comprehension strategies. To compensate for their decoding problems, they often receive audio-support (narration written text). However, audio-support linearly guides readers from beginning to end through texts, possibly hindering the use of reading comprehension strategies in expository texts and negatively impacting reading time and reading comprehension performance. We examined to what extent audio-support affects reading comprehension strategies, reading times, and reading comprehension performance in 21 secondary school students with dyslexia and 22 typically developing controls. Participants were provided with three types of assignments (summarizing, open-ended questions, statement questions) in each condition (written text with and without audio-support). SMI RED-500 eye tracker captured eye movements during reading. The standard deviation of the weighted fixation duration times on the three paragraphs was considered indicative of the disparity of readers’ attention within the text. Following a discrimination based on experts’ reading behavior and hand-coded validation, these scores visualized whether students used the intensive reading strategy (reading whole text) or selective reading strategy (focusing on part of the text). In open-ended assignments, students divided their attention more over the whole text instead of focusing on one specific part when audio was added. In addition, audio-support increased reading time in students with and without dyslexia in most tasks, while in neither of the tasks audio-support affected reading comprehension performance. Audio-support impacts reading comprehension strategy and reading time in all students.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

音频支持对阅读障碍中学生阅读理解策略、时间和表现的影响
使用适当的阅读理解策略对有效阅读很重要。有阅读障碍的学生不仅阅读速度较慢、准确性较低,而且使用的阅读理解策略也较少。为了弥补他们的解码问题,他们经常获得音频支持(叙述文字)。然而,音频支持通过文本从头到尾线性地引导读者,这可能会阻碍解释性文本中阅读理解策略的使用,并对阅读时间和阅读理解表现产生负面影响。我们在21名患有阅读障碍的中学生和22名典型的对照组中,研究了音频支持在多大程度上影响阅读理解策略、阅读时间和阅读理解表现。参与者在每种情况下都被提供了三种类型的作业(总结、开放式问题、陈述问题)(有和没有音频支持的书面文本)。SMI RED-500眼动仪可捕捉阅读过程中的眼动。三个段落的加权注视持续时间的标准差被认为表明了读者在文本中注意力的差异。根据专家的阅读行为和手写验证进行区分后,这些分数直观地显示了学生是使用强化阅读策略(阅读全文)还是选择性阅读策略(关注部分文本)。在开放式作业中,当添加音频时,学生们将注意力更多地分散在整个文本上,而不是集中在一个特定的部分。此外,在大多数任务中,音频支持增加了有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍学生的阅读时间,而在这两项任务中,声音支持都不影响阅读理解表现。音频支持影响所有学生的阅读理解策略和阅读时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信