Applying Mixed-Effects Modeling to Behavioral Economic Demand: An Introduction.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2021-07-21 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s40614-021-00299-7
Brent A Kaplan, Christopher T Franck, Kevin McKee, Shawn P Gilroy, Mikhail N Koffarnus
{"title":"Applying Mixed-Effects Modeling to Behavioral Economic Demand: An Introduction.","authors":"Brent A Kaplan,&nbsp;Christopher T Franck,&nbsp;Kevin McKee,&nbsp;Shawn P Gilroy,&nbsp;Mikhail N Koffarnus","doi":"10.1007/s40614-021-00299-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioral economic demand methodology is increasingly being used in various fields such as substance use and consumer behavior analysis. Traditional analytical techniques to fitting demand data have proven useful yet some of these approaches require preprocessing of data, ignore dependence in the data, and present statistical limitations. We term these approaches \"fit to group\" and \"two stage\" with the former interested in group or population level estimates and the latter interested in individual subject estimates. As an extension to these regression techniques, mixed-effect (or multilevel) modeling can serve as an improvement over these traditional methods. Notable benefits include providing simultaneous group (i.e., population) level estimates (with more accurate standard errors) and individual level predictions while accommodating the inclusion of \"nonsystematic\" response sets and covariates. These models can also accommodate complex experimental designs including repeated measures. The goal of this article is to introduce and provide a high-level overview of mixed-effects modeling techniques applied to behavioral economic demand data. We compare and contrast results from traditional techniques to that of the mixed-effects models across two datasets differing in species and experimental design. We discuss the relative benefits and drawbacks of these approaches and provide access to statistical code and data to support the analytical replicability of the comparisons.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40614-021-00299-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"44 2-3","pages":"333-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40614-021-00299-7","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00299-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Behavioral economic demand methodology is increasingly being used in various fields such as substance use and consumer behavior analysis. Traditional analytical techniques to fitting demand data have proven useful yet some of these approaches require preprocessing of data, ignore dependence in the data, and present statistical limitations. We term these approaches "fit to group" and "two stage" with the former interested in group or population level estimates and the latter interested in individual subject estimates. As an extension to these regression techniques, mixed-effect (or multilevel) modeling can serve as an improvement over these traditional methods. Notable benefits include providing simultaneous group (i.e., population) level estimates (with more accurate standard errors) and individual level predictions while accommodating the inclusion of "nonsystematic" response sets and covariates. These models can also accommodate complex experimental designs including repeated measures. The goal of this article is to introduce and provide a high-level overview of mixed-effects modeling techniques applied to behavioral economic demand data. We compare and contrast results from traditional techniques to that of the mixed-effects models across two datasets differing in species and experimental design. We discuss the relative benefits and drawbacks of these approaches and provide access to statistical code and data to support the analytical replicability of the comparisons.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40614-021-00299-7.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

混合效应模型在行为经济需求中的应用。
行为经济需求方法越来越多地应用于物质使用和消费者行为分析等各个领域。拟合需求数据的传统分析技术已被证明是有用的,但其中一些方法需要对数据进行预处理,忽略了数据中的依赖性,并且存在统计局限性。我们称这些方法为“适合群体”和“两阶段”,前者对群体或群体水平估计感兴趣,后者对个体受试者估计感兴趣。作为这些回归技术的扩展,混合效应(或多层)建模可以作为对这些传统方法的改进。值得注意的好处包括提供同时的群体(即人口)水平估计(具有更准确的标准误差)和个人水平预测,同时适应“非系统”响应集和协变量的包含。这些模型也可以适应复杂的实验设计,包括重复测量。本文的目标是介绍并提供应用于行为经济需求数据的混合效应建模技术的高级概述。我们比较和对比了传统技术和混合效应模型在两个不同物种和实验设计的数据集上的结果。我们讨论了这些方法的相对优点和缺点,并提供了对统计代码和数据的访问,以支持比较的分析可重复性。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s40614-021-00299-7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Perspectives on Behavior Science PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Behavior Science is an official publication of the Association for Behavior Analysis International. It is published quarterly, and in addition to its articles on theoretical, experimental, and applied topics in behavior analysis, this journal also includes literature reviews, re-interpretations of published data, and articles on behaviorism as a philosophy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信