Perturbation-based balance assessment: Examining reactive balance control in older adults with mild cognitive impairments.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Lakshmi N Kannan, Tanvi S Bhatt
{"title":"Perturbation-based balance assessment: Examining reactive balance control in older adults with mild cognitive impairments.","authors":"Lakshmi N Kannan,&nbsp;Tanvi S Bhatt","doi":"10.1556/2060.2021.00181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults with mild cognitive impairment (OAwMCI) present subtle balance and gait deficits along with subjective memory decline. Although these presentations might not affect activities of daily living (ADLs), they attribute to a two-folded increase in falls. While changes occurring in volitional balance control during ADLs have been extensively examined among OAwMCI, reactive balance control, required to recover from external perturbations, has received little attention. Therefore, this study examined reactive balance control in OAwMCI compared to their healthy counterparts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen older adults with mild cognitive impairment (OAwMCI), fifteen cognitively intact older adults (CIOA) (>55 years), and fifteen young adults (18-30 years) were exposed to stance perturbations at three different intensities. Behavioral outcomes postural COM state stability, step length, step initiation, and step execution were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postural COM state stability was the lowest in OAwMCI compared to CIOA and young adults, and it deteriorated at higher perturbation intensities (P < 0.001). Step length was the lowest among OAwMCI and was significantly different from young adults (P < 0.001) but not from CIOA. Unlike OAwMCI, CIOA and young adults increased their step length at higher perturbation intensities (P < 0.001). OAwMCI showed longer recovery step initiation times and shorter execution times compared to CIOA and young adults at higher perturbation intensities (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OAwMCI exhibit exacerbated reactive instability and are unable to modulate their responses as the threat to balance control altered. Thus, they are at a significantly higher risk of falls than their healthy counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20058,"journal":{"name":"Physiology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2060.2021.00181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Older adults with mild cognitive impairment (OAwMCI) present subtle balance and gait deficits along with subjective memory decline. Although these presentations might not affect activities of daily living (ADLs), they attribute to a two-folded increase in falls. While changes occurring in volitional balance control during ADLs have been extensively examined among OAwMCI, reactive balance control, required to recover from external perturbations, has received little attention. Therefore, this study examined reactive balance control in OAwMCI compared to their healthy counterparts.

Methods: Fifteen older adults with mild cognitive impairment (OAwMCI), fifteen cognitively intact older adults (CIOA) (>55 years), and fifteen young adults (18-30 years) were exposed to stance perturbations at three different intensities. Behavioral outcomes postural COM state stability, step length, step initiation, and step execution were computed.

Results: Postural COM state stability was the lowest in OAwMCI compared to CIOA and young adults, and it deteriorated at higher perturbation intensities (P < 0.001). Step length was the lowest among OAwMCI and was significantly different from young adults (P < 0.001) but not from CIOA. Unlike OAwMCI, CIOA and young adults increased their step length at higher perturbation intensities (P < 0.001). OAwMCI showed longer recovery step initiation times and shorter execution times compared to CIOA and young adults at higher perturbation intensities (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: OAwMCI exhibit exacerbated reactive instability and are unable to modulate their responses as the threat to balance control altered. Thus, they are at a significantly higher risk of falls than their healthy counterparts.

基于微扰的平衡评估:检查轻度认知障碍老年人的反应性平衡控制。
背景:老年人轻度认知障碍(OAwMCI)表现为微妙的平衡和步态缺陷以及主观记忆衰退。虽然这些表现可能不会影响日常生活活动(adl),但它们归因于跌倒的双重增加。虽然在OAwMCI中已经广泛研究了adl期间意志平衡控制发生的变化,但从外部扰动中恢复所需的反应性平衡控制却很少受到关注。因此,本研究将OAwMCI患者的反应性平衡控制与健康对照进行了比较。方法:对15名轻度认知障碍老年人(OAwMCI)、15名认知完整老年人(CIOA)(>55岁)和15名18-30岁的年轻人(18-30岁)进行三种不同强度的姿态扰动暴露。行为结果计算体位COM状态稳定性、步长、步启动和步执行。结果:与CIOA和年轻人相比,OAwMCI的体位COM状态稳定性最低,并且在较高的扰动强度下恶化(P < 0.001)。步长在OAwMCI组中最低,与青壮年组差异显著(P < 0.001),但与CIOA组差异无统计学意义。与OAwMCI不同,CIOA和年轻人在较高的扰动强度下增加了步长(P < 0.001)。与CIOA和年轻成人相比,OAwMCI在高扰动强度下表现出更长的恢复步骤启动时间和更短的执行时间(P < 0.001)。结论:OAwMCI表现出加剧的反应性不稳定性,并且随着平衡控制威胁的改变而无法调节其反应。因此,他们比健康的同龄人摔倒的风险要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiology international
Physiology international Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The journal provides a forum for important new research papers written by eminent scientists on experimental medical sciences. Papers reporting on both original work and review articles in the fields of basic and clinical physiology, pathophysiology (from the subcellular organization level up to the oranizmic one), as well as related disciplines, including history of physiological sciences, are accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信