An object lesson: Objects, non-objects, and the power of conceptual construal in adjective extension.

IF 1.5 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Language Learning and Development Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-23 DOI:10.1080/15475441.2020.1847651
Alexander LaTourrette, Sandra R Waxman
{"title":"An object lesson: Objects, non-objects, and the power of conceptual construal in adjective extension.","authors":"Alexander LaTourrette,&nbsp;Sandra R Waxman","doi":"10.1080/15475441.2020.1847651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the seemingly simple mapping between adjectives and perceptual properties (e.g., color, texture), preschool children have difficulty establishing the appropriate extension of novel adjectives. When children hear a novel adjective applied to an individual object, they successfully extend the adjective to other members of the same object category but have difficulty extending it more broadly to members of different categories. We propose that the source of this difficulty lies at the interface of the linguistic and conceptual systems: children initially limit the extension of an adjective to the category of the object on which it was introduced. To test this hypothesis, we manipulated whether participants construed images as \"pictures of things\" (objects) or \"blobs of stuff\" (non-objects). For both 36-month-old children (Experiments 1 and 2) and adults (Experiment 3), the conceptual status of an image influenced how they extended an adjective applied to that image. Children extended novel adjectives more successfully when they construed the images as non-objects than when they construed the same images as objects. Similarly, adults were faster to make adjective extensions when construing the images as non-objects rather than objects. Learners of all ages must navigate this linguistic-conceptual interface in assessing whether and how novel adjectives should be extended to new individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46642,"journal":{"name":"Language Learning and Development","volume":"17 3","pages":"207-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15475441.2020.1847651","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Learning and Development","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2020.1847651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the seemingly simple mapping between adjectives and perceptual properties (e.g., color, texture), preschool children have difficulty establishing the appropriate extension of novel adjectives. When children hear a novel adjective applied to an individual object, they successfully extend the adjective to other members of the same object category but have difficulty extending it more broadly to members of different categories. We propose that the source of this difficulty lies at the interface of the linguistic and conceptual systems: children initially limit the extension of an adjective to the category of the object on which it was introduced. To test this hypothesis, we manipulated whether participants construed images as "pictures of things" (objects) or "blobs of stuff" (non-objects). For both 36-month-old children (Experiments 1 and 2) and adults (Experiment 3), the conceptual status of an image influenced how they extended an adjective applied to that image. Children extended novel adjectives more successfully when they construed the images as non-objects than when they construed the same images as objects. Similarly, adults were faster to make adjective extensions when construing the images as non-objects rather than objects. Learners of all ages must navigate this linguistic-conceptual interface in assessing whether and how novel adjectives should be extended to new individuals.

对象课:对象、非对象和形容词引申中的概念解释能力。
尽管形容词与感知属性(如颜色、纹理)之间的映射看似简单,但学龄前儿童在建立新形容词的适当引申方面存在困难。当孩子们听到一个新的形容词应用于一个单独的对象时,他们成功地将这个形容词扩展到同一对象类别的其他成员,但很难将它更广泛地扩展到不同类别的成员。我们认为,这种困难的根源在于语言和概念系统的界面:儿童最初将形容词的扩展限制在引入它的对象的范畴内。为了验证这一假设,我们操纵了参与者是将图像理解为“事物的图片”(物体)还是“一团东西”(非物体)。对于36个月大的儿童(实验1和2)和成人(实验3),图像的概念状态影响他们如何扩展应用于该图像的形容词。当儿童将图像解释为非物体时,他们比将相同的图像解释为物体时更成功地扩展了新形容词。同样,当成年人将图像解释为非物体而不是物体时,他们可以更快地进行形容词扩展。所有年龄段的学习者在评估是否以及如何将新形容词扩展到新个体时,都必须在这个语言-概念界面中进行导航。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信