Curricular Philosophies Reflected in Individualized Education Program Goals for Students With Complex Support Needs.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Jennifer A Kurth, Elissa Lockman-Turner, Kathryn Burke, Andrea L Ruppar
{"title":"Curricular Philosophies Reflected in Individualized Education Program Goals for Students With Complex Support Needs.","authors":"Jennifer A Kurth,&nbsp;Elissa Lockman-Turner,&nbsp;Kathryn Burke,&nbsp;Andrea L Ruppar","doi":"10.1352/1934-9556-59.4.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individualized education program (IEP) goals are meant to be personalized to address the unique needs of students with disabilities, while also reflecting the student's grade-aligned general education curriculum. IEP goals describe what, how, and where students with disabilities are taught, and reflect the curriculum used to provide instruction. In this study, we analyzed how IEP goals align with the different curricular philosophies for students with severe disabilities. Using a sample of 88 IEPs for students with complex support needs (i.e., severe disabilities) in Grades K-12, we found most goals (57%) reflect curricular philosophies of the 1970s-1990s (i.e., developmental, functional, and social inclusion) eras, with only 26% of IEP goals representative of modern curricular philosophies (i.e., grade-aligned academic content). We also found secondary-aged students were less likely to have grade-aligned academic goals compared to elementary-aged students. We offer implications for ensuring individualization and goals reflecting skills needed for the 21st century.</p>","PeriodicalId":47489,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-59.4.283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Individualized education program (IEP) goals are meant to be personalized to address the unique needs of students with disabilities, while also reflecting the student's grade-aligned general education curriculum. IEP goals describe what, how, and where students with disabilities are taught, and reflect the curriculum used to provide instruction. In this study, we analyzed how IEP goals align with the different curricular philosophies for students with severe disabilities. Using a sample of 88 IEPs for students with complex support needs (i.e., severe disabilities) in Grades K-12, we found most goals (57%) reflect curricular philosophies of the 1970s-1990s (i.e., developmental, functional, and social inclusion) eras, with only 26% of IEP goals representative of modern curricular philosophies (i.e., grade-aligned academic content). We also found secondary-aged students were less likely to have grade-aligned academic goals compared to elementary-aged students. We offer implications for ensuring individualization and goals reflecting skills needed for the 21st century.

课程理念反映在个性化教育计划目标的学生与复杂的支持需求。
个性化教育计划(IEP)的目标是个性化的,以解决残疾学生的独特需求,同时也反映了学生的年级一致的通识教育课程。IEP目标描述了对残疾学生进行教学的内容、方式和地点,并反映了用于提供教学的课程。在这项研究中,我们分析了IEP目标如何与严重残疾学生的不同课程理念相一致。使用88个针对K-12年级有复杂支持需求(即严重残疾)的学生的IEP样本,我们发现大多数目标(57%)反映了20世纪70年代至90年代的课程理念(即发展、功能和社会包容),只有26%的IEP目标代表了现代课程理念(即与年级一致的学术内容)。我们还发现,与小学生相比,初中生的学业目标不太可能与年级一致。我们为确保个性化和目标反映21世纪所需的技能提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is dedicated to meeting the information needs of those who seek effective ways to help people with mental retardation. The journal reports new teaching approaches, program developments, administrative tools, program evaluation, service utilization studies, community surveys, public policy issues, training and case studies, and current research in mental retardation. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is a peer-reviewed journal whose consulting editors represent a broad spectrum of settings: universities, research centers, public and private residential care facilities, and specialized community service agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信