Proposal to create discussion forum to consider evidence on theories of consciousness.

IF 2 4区医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES

Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-14 DOI:10.1080/17588928.2020.1846026

Stan Klein

引用次数: 0

Abstract

I consider the Doerig, Schruger, Herzog (this issue) paper to be a very important paper on the multiple empirical theories of consciousness (ToCs). The paper compared 13 different approaches. It would be wonderful to create a forum for all interested parties to discuss the many issues this paper brought up. Equally important is what the paper didn't bring up. Namely, how do the different empirical approaches connect to qualia, the subjective aspects of consciousness. In my mind, qualia is the biggest mystery facing present science. It would be good to see how the multiple interpretations might connect to qualia.

查看原文本刊更多论文

建议建立讨论论坛来考虑意识理论的证据。

我认为Doerig, Schruger, Herzog(本期)的论文是关于意识的多重经验理论(ToCs)的一篇非常重要的论文。这篇论文比较了13种不同的方法。为所有感兴趣的各方创建一个论坛来讨论本文提出的许多问题，这将是一件很棒的事情。同样重要的是论文中没有提到的东西。也就是说，不同的经验主义方法是如何与意识的主观方面——感质联系起来的。在我看来，质是当今科学面临的最大谜团。看看这些多重解释是如何与质感联系在一起的，这将是件好事。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cognitive Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Cognitive Neuroscience publishes high quality discussion papers and empirical papers on any topic in the field of cognitive neuroscience including perception, attention, memory, language, action, social cognition, and executive function. The journal covers findings based on a variety of techniques such as fMRI, ERPs, MEG, TMS, and focal lesion studies. Contributions that employ or discuss multiple techniques to shed light on the spatial-temporal brain mechanisms underlying a cognitive process are encouraged.