Higher-order theories do just fine.

IF 2 4区医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES

Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-11 DOI:10.1080/17588928.2020.1839402

Matthias Michel, Hakwan Lau

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Doerig et al. have set several criteria that theories of consciousness need to fulfill. By these criteria, higher-order theories fare better than most existing theories. But they also argue that higher-order theories may not be able to answer both the 'small network argument' and the 'other systems argument'. In response, we focus on the case of the Perceptual Reality Monitoring theory to explain why higher-order theories do just fine.

查看原文本刊更多论文

高阶理论做得很好。

Doerig等人设定了意识理论需要满足的几个标准。根据这些标准，高阶理论比大多数现有理论表现得更好。但他们也认为，高阶理论可能无法同时回答“小网络论点”和“其他系统论点”。作为回应，我们将重点放在感知现实监测理论的案例上，以解释为什么高阶理论做得很好。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cognitive Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Cognitive Neuroscience publishes high quality discussion papers and empirical papers on any topic in the field of cognitive neuroscience including perception, attention, memory, language, action, social cognition, and executive function. The journal covers findings based on a variety of techniques such as fMRI, ERPs, MEG, TMS, and focal lesion studies. Contributions that employ or discuss multiple techniques to shed light on the spatial-temporal brain mechanisms underlying a cognitive process are encouraged.