Repeated measurement of implicit self-associations in clinical depression: Psychometric, neural, and computational properties.

IF 4.6 1区 心理学 Q1 Medicine
Journal of abnormal psychology Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-03 DOI:10.1037/abn0000651
Rebecca B Price, Benjamin Panny, Michelle Degutis, Angela Griffo
{"title":"Repeated measurement of implicit self-associations in clinical depression: Psychometric, neural, and computational properties.","authors":"Rebecca B Price,&nbsp;Benjamin Panny,&nbsp;Michelle Degutis,&nbsp;Angela Griffo","doi":"10.1037/abn0000651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implicit self-associations are theorized to be rigidly and excessively negative in affective disorders like depression. Such information processing patterns may be useful as an approach to parsing heterogeneous etiologies, substrates, and treatment outcomes within the broad syndrome of depression. However, there is a lack of sufficient data on the psychometric, neural, and computational substrates of Implicit Association Test (IAT) performance in patient populations. In a treatment-seeking, clinically depressed sample (<i>n</i> = 122), we administered five variants of the IAT-a dominant paradigm used in hundreds of studies of implicit cognition to date-at two repeated sessions (outside and inside a functional MRI scanner). We examined reliability, clinical correlates, and neural and computational substrates of IAT performance. IAT scores showed adequate (.67-.81) split-half reliability and convergent validity with one another and with relevant explicit symptom measures. Test-retest correlations (in vs. outside the functional MRI scanner) were present but modest (.15-.55). In depressed patients, on average, negative implicit self-representations appeared to be weaker or less efficiently processed relative to positive self-representations; elicited greater recruitment of frontoparietal task network regions; and, according to computational modeling of trial-by-trial data, were driven primarily by differential efficiency of information accumulation for negative and positive attributes. Greater degree of discrepancy between implicit and explicit self-worth predicted depression severity. Overall, these IATs show potential utility in understanding heterogeneous substrates of depression but leave substantial room for improvement. The observed clinical, neural, and computational correlates of implicit self-associations offer novel insights into a simple computer-administered task in a clinical population and point toward heterogeneous depression mechanisms and treatment targets. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":14793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of abnormal psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201635/pdf/nihms-1692278.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of abnormal psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000651","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Implicit self-associations are theorized to be rigidly and excessively negative in affective disorders like depression. Such information processing patterns may be useful as an approach to parsing heterogeneous etiologies, substrates, and treatment outcomes within the broad syndrome of depression. However, there is a lack of sufficient data on the psychometric, neural, and computational substrates of Implicit Association Test (IAT) performance in patient populations. In a treatment-seeking, clinically depressed sample (n = 122), we administered five variants of the IAT-a dominant paradigm used in hundreds of studies of implicit cognition to date-at two repeated sessions (outside and inside a functional MRI scanner). We examined reliability, clinical correlates, and neural and computational substrates of IAT performance. IAT scores showed adequate (.67-.81) split-half reliability and convergent validity with one another and with relevant explicit symptom measures. Test-retest correlations (in vs. outside the functional MRI scanner) were present but modest (.15-.55). In depressed patients, on average, negative implicit self-representations appeared to be weaker or less efficiently processed relative to positive self-representations; elicited greater recruitment of frontoparietal task network regions; and, according to computational modeling of trial-by-trial data, were driven primarily by differential efficiency of information accumulation for negative and positive attributes. Greater degree of discrepancy between implicit and explicit self-worth predicted depression severity. Overall, these IATs show potential utility in understanding heterogeneous substrates of depression but leave substantial room for improvement. The observed clinical, neural, and computational correlates of implicit self-associations offer novel insights into a simple computer-administered task in a clinical population and point toward heterogeneous depression mechanisms and treatment targets. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

临床抑郁症中内隐自我联想的重复测量:心理测量学、神经学和计算特性。
内隐自我联想在抑郁症等情感障碍中被认为是严格和过度消极的。这样的信息处理模式可能是一种有用的方法来分析异质性的病因,底物和治疗结果在抑郁症的广泛综合征。然而,在患者群体中,关于内隐联想测验(IAT)表现的心理测量学、神经学和计算基础缺乏足够的数据。在寻求治疗的临床抑郁症样本(n = 122)中,我们在两次重复的会议(在功能MRI扫描仪外和内部)中使用了五个变体的iat,这是迄今为止数百项内隐认知研究中使用的主要范式。我们检查了IAT表现的可靠性、临床相关性以及神经和计算基础。IAT分数显示出足够的(0.67 - 0.81)分半信度和收敛效度,它们彼此之间以及与相关的显性症状测量。测试-重测相关性(在功能MRI扫描仪内与在功能MRI扫描仪外)存在,但不高(0.15 - 0.55)。在抑郁症患者中,平均而言,消极内隐自我表征相对于积极自我表征显得较弱或处理效率较低;诱发更多的额顶任务网络区域的招募;并且,根据逐次试验数据的计算建模,主要受负属性和正属性信息积累效率的差异驱动。内隐自我价值感与外显自我价值感差异越大,抑郁程度越严重。总的来说,这些IATs在理解抑郁症的异质性基础方面显示出潜在的效用,但仍有很大的改进空间。观察到的内隐自我关联的临床、神经和计算相关性为临床人群中简单的计算机管理任务提供了新的见解,并指出了异质性抑郁机制和治疗目标。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Abnormal Psychology® publishes articles on basic research and theory in the broad field of abnormal behavior, its determinants, and its correlates. The following general topics fall within its area of major focus: - psychopathology—its etiology, development, symptomatology, and course; - normal processes in abnormal individuals; - pathological or atypical features of the behavior of normal persons; - experimental studies, with human or animal subjects, relating to disordered emotional behavior or pathology; - sociocultural effects on pathological processes, including the influence of gender and ethnicity; and - tests of hypotheses from psychological theories that relate to abnormal behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信