Stop to Ask and Respond: Effects of a Small-Group Self-Questioning Intervention on Reading Comprehension Performance.

Laurice M Joseph, Sheila Alber-Morgan, Leigh Ann Amspaugh, Kelsey Ross, Maria Helton, Moira Konrad, Carrie Davenport
{"title":"Stop to Ask and Respond: Effects of a Small-Group Self-Questioning Intervention on Reading Comprehension Performance.","authors":"Laurice M Joseph,&nbsp;Sheila Alber-Morgan,&nbsp;Leigh Ann Amspaugh,&nbsp;Kelsey Ross,&nbsp;Maria Helton,&nbsp;Moira Konrad,&nbsp;Carrie Davenport","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-questioning, a strategic approach for monitoring one's own comprehension, has shown promising outcomes for a diverse range of learners. The current study sought to replicate and extend this area of research by examining the effects of a small-group self-questioning intervention with systematic prompt fading on students' reading comprehension performance. Two small groups of fifth grade students performing among the lowest on reading comprehension in their general education classroom were selected to participate in this study. Three participants in each group were taught to stop to ask and respond to questions (STAR strategy) while chorally reading expository text passages. A multiple probe design across the small groups was used to examine the effects of this self-questioning strategy on the reading comprehension performance when prompts were systematically faded. Results indicated the groups, on average, demonstrated an increase in the number of comprehension questions answered correctly. Implications for practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":93051,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in the Schools : The Official Journal of the Texas Association of School Psychologists","volume":"6 1","pages":"27-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7367087/pdf/nihms-1600043.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in the Schools : The Official Journal of the Texas Association of School Psychologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-questioning, a strategic approach for monitoring one's own comprehension, has shown promising outcomes for a diverse range of learners. The current study sought to replicate and extend this area of research by examining the effects of a small-group self-questioning intervention with systematic prompt fading on students' reading comprehension performance. Two small groups of fifth grade students performing among the lowest on reading comprehension in their general education classroom were selected to participate in this study. Three participants in each group were taught to stop to ask and respond to questions (STAR strategy) while chorally reading expository text passages. A multiple probe design across the small groups was used to examine the effects of this self-questioning strategy on the reading comprehension performance when prompts were systematically faded. Results indicated the groups, on average, demonstrated an increase in the number of comprehension questions answered correctly. Implications for practice are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

停止提问和回应:小组自我质疑干预对阅读理解成绩的影响。
自我质疑是一种监控自己理解能力的战略方法,对各种各样的学习者都有很好的效果。当前的研究试图复制和扩展这一研究领域,通过检查具有系统提示褪色的小组自我质疑干预对学生阅读理解表现的影响。本研究选取两组在通识教育课堂上阅读理解表现最差的五年级学生作为研究对象。每组三名参与者被教导在合唱阅读说明性文章时停下来提问和回答问题(STAR策略)。在小群体中使用了多探针设计来检查当提示系统地消失时,这种自我质疑策略对阅读理解表现的影响。结果表明,平均而言,这些小组答对理解题的数量有所增加。讨论了对实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信