Internal medicine paging curriculum to improve physician-nurse interprofessional communication: a single center pilot study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Interprofessional Care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-16 DOI:10.1080/13561820.2020.1743246
Lauren A Heidemann, Samantha Kempner, Eric Walford, Ryan Chippendale, James T Fitzgerald, Helen K Morgan
{"title":"Internal medicine paging curriculum to improve physician-nurse interprofessional communication: a single center pilot study.","authors":"Lauren A Heidemann, Samantha Kempner, Eric Walford, Ryan Chippendale, James T Fitzgerald, Helen K Morgan","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2020.1743246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective physician-nurse communication is critical to patient safety, yet internal medicine trainees are rarely given feedback on this skill. In order to address this gap, we developed a 4-week simulated paging curriculum for senior medical students. Standardized Registered Nurses administered five acute inpatient paging cases to students via telephone and scored communication on a 10-point global scale (1 = <i>highly ineffective</i> to 10 = <i>highly effective</i>) and seven communication domains using a 5-point Likert-type scale. The domains included precision/clarity, instructive, directing, assertive, ability to solicit information, engaged, and structured communication. Students received verbal and written feedback from the nurses on communication skills and clinical decision-making. Our primary goal was to determine if student-nurse communication improved throughout the curriculum. Data were analyzed using multivariate ANOVAs with repeated measures. Twenty-seven students participated. Global communication scores increased significantly from case 1 to case 5 (7.1 to 8.7, <i>p</i> < .01). The following communication domains increased significantly: precision (3.8 to 4.4, <i>p</i> < .01), instructive (3.6 to 4.7, <i>p</i> < .01), directing (4.0 to 4.6, <i>p</i> = .02), assertiveness (4.0 to 4.7, <i>p</i> = .04), engaged (4.1 to 4.7, <i>p</i> < .01). In conclusion, this curriculum can be an innovative approach to improve physician-nurse communication using standardized registered nurses to deliver structured feedback to medical trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"122-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1743246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective physician-nurse communication is critical to patient safety, yet internal medicine trainees are rarely given feedback on this skill. In order to address this gap, we developed a 4-week simulated paging curriculum for senior medical students. Standardized Registered Nurses administered five acute inpatient paging cases to students via telephone and scored communication on a 10-point global scale (1 = highly ineffective to 10 = highly effective) and seven communication domains using a 5-point Likert-type scale. The domains included precision/clarity, instructive, directing, assertive, ability to solicit information, engaged, and structured communication. Students received verbal and written feedback from the nurses on communication skills and clinical decision-making. Our primary goal was to determine if student-nurse communication improved throughout the curriculum. Data were analyzed using multivariate ANOVAs with repeated measures. Twenty-seven students participated. Global communication scores increased significantly from case 1 to case 5 (7.1 to 8.7, p < .01). The following communication domains increased significantly: precision (3.8 to 4.4, p < .01), instructive (3.6 to 4.7, p < .01), directing (4.0 to 4.6, p = .02), assertiveness (4.0 to 4.7, p = .04), engaged (4.1 to 4.7, p < .01). In conclusion, this curriculum can be an innovative approach to improve physician-nurse communication using standardized registered nurses to deliver structured feedback to medical trainees.

内科寻呼课程改善医生与护士的跨专业交流:单中心试点研究。
有效的医护沟通对患者安全至关重要,但内科受训者却很少能得到有关这一技能的反馈。为了弥补这一不足,我们为高年级医学生开发了为期 4 周的模拟传呼课程。标准化注册护士通过电话为学生们提供了五个急性住院病人传呼案例,并使用 10 分全面量表(1 = 非常无效到 10 = 非常有效)和 5 分李克特量表对沟通进行评分。这些领域包括精确/清晰度、指导性、引导性、自信性、获取信息的能力、参与性和结构化交流。学生从护士那里获得有关沟通技巧和临床决策的口头和书面反馈。我们的主要目标是确定学生与护士之间的沟通在整个课程中是否有所改善。我们使用多变量方差分析和重复测量对数据进行了分析。共有 27 名学生参与。从病例 1 到病例 5,整体沟通得分明显增加(从 7.1 到 8.7,p < .01)。以下沟通领域的得分明显提高:精确性(从 3.8 到 4.4,p < .01)、指导性(从 3.6 到 4.7,p < .01)、引导性(从 4.0 到 4.6,p = .02)、自信性(从 4.0 到 4.7,p = .04)、参与性(从 4.1 到 4.7,p < .01)。总之,该课程可作为一种创新方法,利用标准化注册护士向医学学员提供结构化反馈来改善医护沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信