Three perspectives on the co-location of maternity services: qualitative interviews with mothers, midwives and health visitors.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Interprofessional Care Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2020-02-03 DOI:10.1080/13561820.2020.1712338
Ellinor K Olander, Maria Raisa Jessica Ryc Aquino, Ros Bryar
{"title":"Three perspectives on the co-location of maternity services: qualitative interviews with mothers, midwives and health visitors.","authors":"Ellinor K Olander, Maria Raisa Jessica Ryc Aquino, Ros Bryar","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2020.1712338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maternity policy in England has recommended the establishment of Community Hubs, where health-care professionals who care for women during and after pregnancy are co-located and can provide care collaboratively. The aim this paper is to explore midwives,' health visitors' and postnatal women's experiences and views of co-location of midwifery and health visiting services and collaborative practice. In total 15 midwives, 17 health visitors, and 29 mothers participated in a semi-structured interview, either via phone or face-to-face. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. Participants reported how care is currently provided in numerous settings, with home visits especially well liked. Co-location was perceived to be of benefit, however some mothers were not convinced of its necessity, suggesting that integrated services are more important than co-located services. Health-care professionals recognized that co-location aids but does not automatically improve interprofessional collaboration. These findings highlight the need for careful consideration before implementing co-located maternity services. Community Hubs may be apromising strategy to improve care for women and their families but to provide interprofessional care and collaboration appropriate managerial and organizational support is needed. With this support, midwives and health visitors have the potential to deliver the best care possible for women and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"583-591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1712338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maternity policy in England has recommended the establishment of Community Hubs, where health-care professionals who care for women during and after pregnancy are co-located and can provide care collaboratively. The aim this paper is to explore midwives,' health visitors' and postnatal women's experiences and views of co-location of midwifery and health visiting services and collaborative practice. In total 15 midwives, 17 health visitors, and 29 mothers participated in a semi-structured interview, either via phone or face-to-face. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. Participants reported how care is currently provided in numerous settings, with home visits especially well liked. Co-location was perceived to be of benefit, however some mothers were not convinced of its necessity, suggesting that integrated services are more important than co-located services. Health-care professionals recognized that co-location aids but does not automatically improve interprofessional collaboration. These findings highlight the need for careful consideration before implementing co-located maternity services. Community Hubs may be apromising strategy to improve care for women and their families but to provide interprofessional care and collaboration appropriate managerial and organizational support is needed. With this support, midwives and health visitors have the potential to deliver the best care possible for women and their families.

关于产科服务合用同一地点的三种观点:对母亲、助产士和健康访视员的定性访谈。
英格兰的孕产妇政策建议建立社区中心,在那里,为孕期和产后妇女提供护理服务的专业医护人员可以在同一地点办公,共同提供护理服务。本文旨在探讨助产士、健康访视员和产后妇女对助产和健康访视服务同地办公及合作实践的经验和看法。共有 15 名助产士、17 名健康访视员和 29 名母亲通过电话或面对面的方式参与了半结构化访谈。我们对访谈记录进行了专题分析。参与者报告了目前是如何在多种环境下提供护理服务的,其中家访尤其受到好评。她们认为在同一地点提供服务是有益的,但有些母亲不认为有必要这样做,她们认为综合服务比在同一地点提供服务更重要。医护人员认识到,同地办公有助于但不会自动改善专业间的合作。这些研究结果突出表明,在实施一地分娩服务之前,需要慎重考虑。社区中心可能是改善妇女及其家庭护理的有效策略,但要提供跨专业护理和协作,需要适当的管理和组织支持。有了这些支持,助产士和健康访视员就有可能为妇女及其家庭提供最好的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信