Through the resident lens: examining knowledge and attitudes about midwifery among physician trainees.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Interprofessional Care Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2018-11-11 DOI:10.1080/13561820.2018.1543258
Kathryn Lefebvre, Jennifer Wild, Kathrin Stoll, Saraswathi Vedam
{"title":"Through the resident lens: examining knowledge and attitudes about midwifery among physician trainees.","authors":"Kathryn Lefebvre, Jennifer Wild, Kathrin Stoll, Saraswathi Vedam","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2018.1543258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interprofessional collaboration optimizes maternal-newborn outcomes and satisfaction with care. Since 2002, midwives have provided an increasing proportion of maternity care in British Columbia (BC). Midwives often collaborate with and/or refer to physicians; but no study to date has explored Canadian medical trainees' exposure to, knowledge of, and attitudes towards midwifery practice.We designed an online cross-sectional questionnaire that included a scale to measure attitudes towards midwifery (13 items) and residents' knowledge of midwifery (94 items across 5 domains). A multi-disciplinary expert panel rated each item for importance, relevance, and clarity. The survey was distributed to family medicine (n = 338) and obstetric (n = 40) residents in BC.We analyzed responses from 114 residents. Residents with more favourable exposures to midwifery during their education had significantly more positive attitudes towards midwives (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.32, p = 0.007). We also found a significant positive correlation between residents' attitudes towards midwifery and four of five knowledge domains: scope of practice (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.41, p < 0.001); content of education (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.30, p = 0.002), equipment midwives carry to home births (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.30, p = 0.004) and tests that midwives can order (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.39, p < 0.001). The most unfavourable exposures were observing interprofessional conversations (66.2%), and providing inpatient consultations for midwives (61.4%). Findings suggest increased interprofessional education may foster improved midwife-physician collaboration.<b>Abbreviations:</b> BC - British Columbia; UBC - University of British Columbia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"546-555"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1543258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration optimizes maternal-newborn outcomes and satisfaction with care. Since 2002, midwives have provided an increasing proportion of maternity care in British Columbia (BC). Midwives often collaborate with and/or refer to physicians; but no study to date has explored Canadian medical trainees' exposure to, knowledge of, and attitudes towards midwifery practice.We designed an online cross-sectional questionnaire that included a scale to measure attitudes towards midwifery (13 items) and residents' knowledge of midwifery (94 items across 5 domains). A multi-disciplinary expert panel rated each item for importance, relevance, and clarity. The survey was distributed to family medicine (n = 338) and obstetric (n = 40) residents in BC.We analyzed responses from 114 residents. Residents with more favourable exposures to midwifery during their education had significantly more positive attitudes towards midwives (rs = 0.32, p = 0.007). We also found a significant positive correlation between residents' attitudes towards midwifery and four of five knowledge domains: scope of practice (rs = 0.41, p < 0.001); content of education (rs = 0.30, p = 0.002), equipment midwives carry to home births (rs = 0.30, p = 0.004) and tests that midwives can order (rs = 0.39, p < 0.001). The most unfavourable exposures were observing interprofessional conversations (66.2%), and providing inpatient consultations for midwives (61.4%). Findings suggest increased interprofessional education may foster improved midwife-physician collaboration.Abbreviations: BC - British Columbia; UBC - University of British Columbia.

通过住院医师的视角:考察受训医师对助产的认识和态度。
跨专业合作可优化孕产妇和新生儿的治疗效果并提高护理满意度。自 2002 年以来,助产士在不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC 省)提供的产科护理中所占的比例越来越大。助产士经常与医生合作和/或向医生转诊;但迄今为止,还没有研究探讨过加拿大医学学员对助产实践的接触、了解和态度。我们设计了一份在线横截面问卷,其中包括一个量表,用于测量对助产的态度(13 个项目)和住院医师对助产的了解(94 个项目,涉及 5 个领域)。一个多学科专家小组对每个项目的重要性、相关性和清晰度进行了评分。调查问卷分发给了不列颠哥伦比亚省的家庭医学住院医师(338 人)和产科住院医师(40 人)。我们对 114 名住院医师的回复进行了分析。在接受教育期间接触过助产士的住院医师对助产士的态度更积极(rs = 0.32,p = 0.007)。我们还发现,住院医师对助产士的态度与以下五个知识领域中的四个领域之间存在明显的正相关关系:执业范围(rs = 0.41,p s = 0.30,p = 0.002)、助产士在家庭分娩时携带的设备(rs = 0.30,p = 0.004)和助产士可以进行的测试(rs = 0.39,p = 0.002)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信