{"title":"Trends, in Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome by Specialty.","authors":"Nicole Uliassi, Shannon Sullivan, Lauren Damle, Veronica Gomez-Lobo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify trends in the diagnostic work- up of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) performed by specialists in general medicine, endocrinology, and gynecology.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Ret- rospective electronic chart review of adolescents and young women whose workup for PCOS was initiated by specialists in endocrinology, general medicine, or gyne- cology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 530 charts reviewed, 84 patients quali- fied for inclusion. Approximately two-thirds of patients seen by generalists and endocrinologists had lipid test- ing done; no gynecologist in this study ordered lipid tests. Cortisol levels and markers of congenital adrenal hyperplasia were more often ordered for patients seen by endocrinologists than for those seen by generalists or gynecologists. There was no significant difference among specialties in the use of diagnostic criteria for PCOS, including menstrual irregularity, hyperandrogenism, ovarian imaging, or exclusion of other etiologies. Women seen by endocrinologists tended to be prescribed met- formin more often; however, there was no significant difference in the use of hormonal contraceptives, piogli- tazone, and spironolactone among specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Across 3 clinical practice specialties commonly evaluating menstrual irregularity and/or hirsutism in young women, patients were consistently diagnosed with PCOS based on appropriate, clinically- accepted criteria. However, no patients seen by gyne- cologists received lipid test- ing, which is considered an important screening study for cardiovascular disease risk in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"61 9-10","pages":"441-446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To identify trends in the diagnostic work- up of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) performed by specialists in general medicine, endocrinology, and gynecology.
Study design: Ret- rospective electronic chart review of adolescents and young women whose workup for PCOS was initiated by specialists in endocrinology, general medicine, or gyne- cology.
Results: Of 530 charts reviewed, 84 patients quali- fied for inclusion. Approximately two-thirds of patients seen by generalists and endocrinologists had lipid test- ing done; no gynecologist in this study ordered lipid tests. Cortisol levels and markers of congenital adrenal hyperplasia were more often ordered for patients seen by endocrinologists than for those seen by generalists or gynecologists. There was no significant difference among specialties in the use of diagnostic criteria for PCOS, including menstrual irregularity, hyperandrogenism, ovarian imaging, or exclusion of other etiologies. Women seen by endocrinologists tended to be prescribed met- formin more often; however, there was no significant difference in the use of hormonal contraceptives, piogli- tazone, and spironolactone among specialties.
Conclusion: Across 3 clinical practice specialties commonly evaluating menstrual irregularity and/or hirsutism in young women, patients were consistently diagnosed with PCOS based on appropriate, clinically- accepted criteria. However, no patients seen by gyne- cologists received lipid test- ing, which is considered an important screening study for cardiovascular disease risk in this population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.