Gateway to Recovery: A Comparative Analysis of Stroke Patients' Experiences of Change and Learning in Norway and Denmark.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Research and Practice Pub Date : 2019-01-17 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/1726964
Hanne Pallesen, Lena Aadal, Siri Moe, Cathrine Arntzen
{"title":"Gateway to Recovery: A Comparative Analysis of Stroke Patients' Experiences of Change and Learning in Norway and Denmark.","authors":"Hanne Pallesen,&nbsp;Lena Aadal,&nbsp;Siri Moe,&nbsp;Cathrine Arntzen","doi":"10.1155/2019/1726964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The recovery process is reported by stroke survivors to be a change process fraught with crises and hazard. Interaction with health professionals and others may play a central role in establishing renewed control over life.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>(1) How do patients handle and overcome experienced changes after stroke? (2) How do they experience the support to handle these changes during the first year after stroke? (3) How do the similarities and differences transpire in Danish and Norwegian contexts? <i>Methodology</i>. A qualitative method was chosen. Six patients from Denmark and five patients from Norway (aged 25-66) were followed up until one year after stroke, by way of individual interviews. The data were analyzed (using NVivo 11) by means of phenomenological analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The participants described four main issues in the recovery process that impacted the experienced changes: (i) strategies and personal factors that promote motivation, (ii) the involvement of family, social network, and peers, (iii) professionals' support, and (iv) social structures that limit the recovery process. There was a diversity of professional support and some interesting variations in findings about factors that affected recovery and the ability to manage a new life situation between Central Denmark and Northern Norway. Both Norwegian and Danish participants experienced positive changes and progress on the bodily level, as well as in terms of activity and participation. Furthermore, they learned how to overcome limitations, especially in bodily functions and daily activities at home. Unfortunately, progress or support related to psychosocial rehabilitation was almost absent in the Norwegian data.</p>","PeriodicalId":45585,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","volume":"2019 ","pages":"1726964"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/1726964","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1726964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Objectives: The recovery process is reported by stroke survivors to be a change process fraught with crises and hazard. Interaction with health professionals and others may play a central role in establishing renewed control over life.

Research questions: (1) How do patients handle and overcome experienced changes after stroke? (2) How do they experience the support to handle these changes during the first year after stroke? (3) How do the similarities and differences transpire in Danish and Norwegian contexts? Methodology. A qualitative method was chosen. Six patients from Denmark and five patients from Norway (aged 25-66) were followed up until one year after stroke, by way of individual interviews. The data were analyzed (using NVivo 11) by means of phenomenological analysis.

Findings: The participants described four main issues in the recovery process that impacted the experienced changes: (i) strategies and personal factors that promote motivation, (ii) the involvement of family, social network, and peers, (iii) professionals' support, and (iv) social structures that limit the recovery process. There was a diversity of professional support and some interesting variations in findings about factors that affected recovery and the ability to manage a new life situation between Central Denmark and Northern Norway. Both Norwegian and Danish participants experienced positive changes and progress on the bodily level, as well as in terms of activity and participation. Furthermore, they learned how to overcome limitations, especially in bodily functions and daily activities at home. Unfortunately, progress or support related to psychosocial rehabilitation was almost absent in the Norwegian data.

Abstract Image

康复之门:挪威和丹麦脑卒中患者改变和学习经验的比较分析。
目的:据中风幸存者报道,恢复过程是一个充满危机和危险的变化过程。与卫生专业人员和其他人的互动可能在重新控制生活方面发挥核心作用。研究问题:(1)患者如何处理和克服脑卒中后经历的变化?(2)在中风后的第一年,他们如何获得支持来应对这些变化?(3)丹麦语和挪威语的异同是如何体现的?方法。采用定性方法。6名丹麦患者和5名挪威患者(年龄25-66岁)通过个人访谈的方式随访至中风后一年。采用现象学分析方法对数据进行分析(使用NVivo 11)。研究结果:参与者描述了在康复过程中影响经历变化的四个主要问题:(i)促进动机的策略和个人因素,(ii)家庭、社会网络和同伴的参与,(iii)专业人员的支持,以及(iv)限制康复过程的社会结构。在丹麦中部和挪威北部之间,有各种各样的专业支持,关于影响康复和管理新生活状况能力的因素的调查结果也有一些有趣的变化。挪威和丹麦的参与者在身体水平上以及在活动和参与方面都经历了积极的变化和进步。此外,他们学会了如何克服限制,特别是在身体功能和日常活动在家里。不幸的是,在挪威的数据中几乎没有与心理社会康复有关的进展或支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation. The journal focuses on improving and restoring functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. In addition, articles looking at techniques to assess and study disabling conditions will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信