How Do Patients Understand Safety for Cardiac Implantable Devices? Importance of Postintervention Education.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION

Rehabilitation Research and Practice Pub Date : 2018-06-24 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/5689353

Bekir Serhat Yildiz, Gulin Findikoglu, Yusuf Izzettin Alihanoglu, Ismail Dogu Kilic, Harun Evrengul, Hande Senol

{"title":"How Do Patients Understand Safety for Cardiac Implantable Devices? Importance of Postintervention Education.","authors":"Bekir Serhat Yildiz, Gulin Findikoglu, Yusuf Izzettin Alihanoglu, Ismail Dogu Kilic, Harun Evrengul, Hande Senol","doi":"10.1155/2018/5689353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study was designed to assess the effect of patient education on the knowledge of safety and awareness about living with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) within the context of phase I cardiac rehabilitation.Methods: The study was conducted with 28 newly implanted CIED patients who were included in \"education group (EG)\". Patients were questioned with a survey about living with CIEDs and electromagnetic interference (EMI) before and 1 month after an extensive constructed interview. Ninety-three patients who had been living with CIEDs were included in the \"without education group (woEG)\".Results: Patients in EG had improved awareness on topics related to physical and daily life activities including work, driving, sports and sexual activities, EMI of household items, harmful equipment, and some of the medical devices in the hospital setting (p<0.05). Patients in EG gave significantly different percent of correct answers for doing exercise or sports, using the arm on the side of CIEDs, EMI of some of the household appliances, medical devices, and all of the harmful equipment compared to woEG (p<0.05).Conclusion: It was demonstrated that a constructed education interview on safety of CIEDs and living with these devices within the context of phase I cardiac rehabilitation is important for improving the awareness of patients significantly. Thus, patients might achieve a faster adaptation to daily life and decrease disinformation and misperceptions and thus promote the quality of life after the device implantation.","PeriodicalId":45585,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/5689353","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5689353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Abstract

Aim: This study was designed to assess the effect of patient education on the knowledge of safety and awareness about living with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) within the context of phase I cardiac rehabilitation.

Methods: The study was conducted with 28 newly implanted CIED patients who were included in "education group (EG)". Patients were questioned with a survey about living with CIEDs and electromagnetic interference (EMI) before and 1 month after an extensive constructed interview. Ninety-three patients who had been living with CIEDs were included in the "without education group (woEG)".

Results: Patients in EG had improved awareness on topics related to physical and daily life activities including work, driving, sports and sexual activities, EMI of household items, harmful equipment, and some of the medical devices in the hospital setting (p<0.05). Patients in EG gave significantly different percent of correct answers for doing exercise or sports, using the arm on the side of CIEDs, EMI of some of the household appliances, medical devices, and all of the harmful equipment compared to woEG (p<0.05).

Conclusion: It was demonstrated that a constructed education interview on safety of CIEDs and living with these devices within the context of phase I cardiac rehabilitation is important for improving the awareness of patients significantly. Thus, patients might achieve a faster adaptation to daily life and decrease disinformation and misperceptions and thus promote the quality of life after the device implantation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

患者如何理解心脏植入装置的安全性?干预后教育的重要性。

目的:本研究旨在评估在I期心脏康复的背景下，患者教育对使用心脏植入式电子装置(CIEDs)生活的安全知识和意识的影响。方法:选取28例新植入式CIED患者作为“教育组”进行研究。在广泛的构建访谈之前和1个月后，对患者进行了关于cied生活和电磁干扰(EMI)的调查。93例患有cied的患者被纳入“无教育组”(woEG)。结果:EG患者对身体和日常生活活动，包括工作、驾驶、运动和性活动，家庭用品的EMI，有害设备和医院环境中的一些医疗器械的相关话题的认识有所提高。结论:在I期心脏康复的背景下，构建关于cied安全性和使用这些设备生活的教育访谈对显著提高患者的认识很重要。因此，患者可以更快地适应日常生活，减少虚假信息和误解，从而提高装置植入后的生活质量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Rehabilitation Research and Practice REHABILITATION-

CiteScore

3.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

19 weeks

期刊介绍： Rehabilitation Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation. The journal focuses on improving and restoring functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. In addition, articles looking at techniques to assess and study disabling conditions will be considered.