Bulent Urman, Serdar Celik, Kayhan Yakin, Ebru Alper, Basak Balaban, Baris Ata
{"title":"Vaginal Progesterone Gel for Luteal Support After Cleavage Stage Embryo Transfer: Once or Twice a Day?","authors":"Bulent Urman, Serdar Celik, Kayhan Yakin, Ebru Alper, Basak Balaban, Baris Ata","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: To determine whether twice daily dosing of progesterone vaginal gel (PVG) is better for luteal phase support (LPS) than once daily dosing.\n\nSTUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study including 456 women aged ≤42 years who underwent assisted reproductive technology with long GnRH agonist protocol. Blastocyst transfers and difficult embryo transfers were excluded. LPS was started with 90 mg PVG once daily on the evening of oocyte retrieval and continued until negative pregnancy test or 10th week of pregnancy in both groups. PVG dosage was doubled on the day of embryo transfer in the twice-daily group.\n\nRESULTS: Age, duration of infertility, and number of oocytes collected were similar. Numbers of embryos transferred were 2.9 and 2.8 in the once-daily and twice-daily groups, respectively (p=0.04). Embryo implantation (23.96% vs. 27.95%) and clinical pregnancy (50.9% vs. 56.5%) rates favored twice-daily dosage; however, differences were statistically nonsignificant, and the study had 20% power to demonstrate significance. When our results were pooled with a prior trial comparing once and twice daily dosing, twice daily dosing seemed to significantly increase clinical pregnancy rate (rate ratio: 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38).\n\nCONCLUSION: Trends favoring twice daily dosing are encouraging findings\nand require further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"60-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether twice daily dosing of progesterone vaginal gel (PVG) is better for luteal phase support (LPS) than once daily dosing.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study including 456 women aged ≤42 years who underwent assisted reproductive technology with long GnRH agonist protocol. Blastocyst transfers and difficult embryo transfers were excluded. LPS was started with 90 mg PVG once daily on the evening of oocyte retrieval and continued until negative pregnancy test or 10th week of pregnancy in both groups. PVG dosage was doubled on the day of embryo transfer in the twice-daily group.
RESULTS: Age, duration of infertility, and number of oocytes collected were similar. Numbers of embryos transferred were 2.9 and 2.8 in the once-daily and twice-daily groups, respectively (p=0.04). Embryo implantation (23.96% vs. 27.95%) and clinical pregnancy (50.9% vs. 56.5%) rates favored twice-daily dosage; however, differences were statistically nonsignificant, and the study had 20% power to demonstrate significance. When our results were pooled with a prior trial comparing once and twice daily dosing, twice daily dosing seemed to significantly increase clinical pregnancy rate (rate ratio: 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38).
CONCLUSION: Trends favoring twice daily dosing are encouraging findings
and require further investigation.
目的:确定每日两次给药的孕酮阴道凝胶(PVG)是否优于每日一次给药的黄体期支持(LPS)。研究设计:回顾性研究包括456名年龄≤42岁的妇女,她们接受了长期GnRH激动剂方案的辅助生殖技术。排除囊胚移植和困难的胚胎移植。两组患者在卵母细胞回收当晚以90mg PVG开始LPS治疗,每日1次,持续至妊娠试验阴性或妊娠第10周。每日两次组PVG剂量在胚胎移植当天增加一倍。结果:年龄、不孕症持续时间、收集的卵母细胞数量相似。每日1次组和每日2次组的移植胚胎数分别为2.9个和2.8个(p=0.04)。胚胎着床率(23.96% vs. 27.95%)和临床妊娠率(50.9% vs. 56.5%)倾向于每日两次剂量;然而,差异在统计学上不显著,该研究有20%的能力证明显著性。当我们的结果与先前比较每日一次和两次给药的试验合并时,每日两次给药似乎显著增加临床妊娠率(比率比:1.18,95% CI 1.01-1.38)。结论:倾向于每日两次给药的趋势是令人鼓舞的发现,需要进一步调查。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.