Pre- and Postintervention Factor Structure of Functional Independence Measure in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Research and Practice Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-21 DOI:10.1155/2017/6938718
Mikhail Saltychev, Janne Lähdesmäki, Petteri Jokinen, Katri Laimi
{"title":"Pre- and Postintervention Factor Structure of Functional Independence Measure in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.","authors":"Mikhail Saltychev,&nbsp;Janne Lähdesmäki,&nbsp;Petteri Jokinen,&nbsp;Katri Laimi","doi":"10.1155/2017/6938718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the factor structure of Functional Independence Measure (FIM®) scale amongst people with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, register-based cohort study on 155 rehabilitants with SCI. FIM was assessed at the beginning and at the end of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation. The internal consistency of the FIM was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis was employed to approximate the construct structure of FIM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistency demonstrated high Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 to 0.96. For both pre- and postintervention assessments, the exploratory factor analysis resulted in 3-factor structures. Except for two items (\"walking or using a wheelchair\" and \"expression\"), the structures of the identified three factors remained the same from the beginning to the end of rehabilitation. The loadings of all items were sufficient, exceeding 0.3. Both pre- and postintervention chi-square tests showed significant <i>p</i> values < 0.0001. The \"motor\" domain was divided into two factors with this 2-factor structure enduring through the intervention period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amongst rehabilitants with SCI, FIM failed to demonstrate unidimensionality. Instead, it showed a 3-factor structure that fluctuated only little depending on the timing of measurement. Additionally, when measured separately, also motor score was 2-dimensional, not 1-dimensional. Using a total or subscale FIM, scores seem to be unjustified in the studied population.</p>","PeriodicalId":45585,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","volume":"2017 ","pages":"6938718"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6938718","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6938718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the factor structure of Functional Independence Measure (FIM®) scale amongst people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods: This was a retrospective, register-based cohort study on 155 rehabilitants with SCI. FIM was assessed at the beginning and at the end of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation. The internal consistency of the FIM was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis was employed to approximate the construct structure of FIM.

Results: The internal consistency demonstrated high Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 to 0.96. For both pre- and postintervention assessments, the exploratory factor analysis resulted in 3-factor structures. Except for two items ("walking or using a wheelchair" and "expression"), the structures of the identified three factors remained the same from the beginning to the end of rehabilitation. The loadings of all items were sufficient, exceeding 0.3. Both pre- and postintervention chi-square tests showed significant p values < 0.0001. The "motor" domain was divided into two factors with this 2-factor structure enduring through the intervention period.

Conclusions: Amongst rehabilitants with SCI, FIM failed to demonstrate unidimensionality. Instead, it showed a 3-factor structure that fluctuated only little depending on the timing of measurement. Additionally, when measured separately, also motor score was 2-dimensional, not 1-dimensional. Using a total or subscale FIM, scores seem to be unjustified in the studied population.

Abstract Image

脊髓损伤患者功能独立性测量干预前后因子结构。
目的:评价脊髓损伤(SCI)患者功能独立性量表(FIM®)的因子结构。方法:对155例脊髓损伤康复者进行回顾性、基于登记的队列研究。FIM在多学科住院康复的开始和结束时进行评估。采用Cronbach’s alpha评价模型的内部一致性,并采用探索性因子分析来近似模型的结构。结果:内部一致性高,Cronbach's alpha值为0.95 ~ 0.96。对于干预前和干预后的评估,探索性因素分析结果为3因素结构。除了“行走或使用轮椅”和“表情”两个项目外,所识别的三个因素的结构从康复开始到结束都保持不变。所有项目的装载量都是充足的,超过0.3。干预前后卡方检验均显示p值< 0.0001。“运动”区域被划分为两个因子,这种双因子结构在干预期间持续存在。结论:在脊髓损伤康复者中,FIM未表现出单向度。相反,它显示了一个3因素结构,随着测量时间的变化,波动很小。此外,当单独测量时,运动评分也是二维的,而不是一维的。使用总体或亚量表FIM,在研究人群中得分似乎是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation. The journal focuses on improving and restoring functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. In addition, articles looking at techniques to assess and study disabling conditions will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信