The Process and Product of Coherence Monitoring in Young Readers: Effects of Reader and Text Characteristics.

IF 2.9 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Scientific Studies of Reading Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-19 DOI:10.1080/10888438.2020.1831503
Nicola K Currie, Gillian Francey, Robert Davies, Shelley Gray, Mindy S Bridges, Maria Adelaida Restrepo, Marilyn S Thompson, Margeaux F Ciraolo, Jinxiang Hu, Kate Cain
{"title":"The Process and Product of Coherence Monitoring in Young Readers: Effects of Reader and Text Characteristics.","authors":"Nicola K Currie,&nbsp;Gillian Francey,&nbsp;Robert Davies,&nbsp;Shelley Gray,&nbsp;Mindy S Bridges,&nbsp;Maria Adelaida Restrepo,&nbsp;Marilyn S Thompson,&nbsp;Margeaux F Ciraolo,&nbsp;Jinxiang Hu,&nbsp;Kate Cain","doi":"10.1080/10888438.2020.1831503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined sixth graders' detection of inconsistencies in narrative and expository passages, contrasting participants who were monolingual speakers (N = 85) or Spanish-English DLLs (N = 94) when recruited in pre-kindergarten (PK). We recorded self-paced reading times and judgments about whether the text made sense, and took an independent measure of word reading. Main findings were that inconsistency detection was better for narratives, for participants who were monolingual speakers in PK, and for those who were better word readers. When the text processing demands were increased by separating the inconsistent sentence and its premise with filler sentences there was a stronger signal for inconsistency detection during reading for better word readers. Reading patterns differed for texts for which children reported an inconsistency compared to those for which they did not, indicating a failure to adequately monitor for coherence while reading. Our performance measures indicate that narrative and expository texts make different demands on readers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48032,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Studies of Reading","volume":"25 2","pages":"141-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10888438.2020.1831503","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Studies of Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1831503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

We examined sixth graders' detection of inconsistencies in narrative and expository passages, contrasting participants who were monolingual speakers (N = 85) or Spanish-English DLLs (N = 94) when recruited in pre-kindergarten (PK). We recorded self-paced reading times and judgments about whether the text made sense, and took an independent measure of word reading. Main findings were that inconsistency detection was better for narratives, for participants who were monolingual speakers in PK, and for those who were better word readers. When the text processing demands were increased by separating the inconsistent sentence and its premise with filler sentences there was a stronger signal for inconsistency detection during reading for better word readers. Reading patterns differed for texts for which children reported an inconsistency compared to those for which they did not, indicating a failure to adequately monitor for coherence while reading. Our performance measures indicate that narrative and expository texts make different demands on readers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

青年读者连贯监测的过程和结果:读者和语篇特征的影响。
我们检查了六年级学生对叙事和说明性段落不一致的检测,对比了在幼儿园前(PK)招募的单语者(N = 85)和西班牙语-英语DLLs (N = 94)的参与者。我们记录了自定节奏的阅读时间和对文本是否有意义的判断,并对单词阅读进行了独立测量。主要发现是,不一致的检测对叙述、PK中单语的参与者和更好的单词阅读者来说更好。当用填充句分离不一致句及其前提,增加文本处理需求时,阅读过程中不一致检测的信号更强。阅读模式在孩子们报告不一致的文本与没有报告不一致的文本之间存在差异,这表明在阅读时未能充分监测连贯性。我们的表现测量表明,叙事性和说明性文本对读者的要求不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original empirical investigations dealing with all aspects of reading and its related areas, and, occasionally, scholarly reviews of the literature, papers focused on theory development, and discussions of social policy issues. Papers range from very basic studies to those whose main thrust is toward educational practice. The journal also includes work on "all aspects of reading and its related areas," a phrase that is sufficiently general to encompass issues related to word recognition, comprehension, writing, intervention, and assessment involving very young children and/or adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信