[Understanding and Attitudes of Dietitians towards "Foods with Function Claims"].

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Chiharu Nishijima, Kaoru Sato, Tsuyoshi Chiba
{"title":"[Understanding and Attitudes of Dietitians towards \"Foods with Function Claims\"].","authors":"Chiharu Nishijima, Kaoru Sato, Tsuyoshi Chiba","doi":"10.3358/shokueishi.62.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of dietitians is important for consumers to practice self-care, which includes the use of the \"Foods with Function Claims (FFC)\". In this study, a nationwide internet survey was conducted to clarify the understanding and attitudes of dietitians towards the FFC 1 year and 4 years after its introduction (Surveys were conducted in 2015 and 2019, respectively). In the survey of 1 year after the introduction, the ratio of recognition of the FFC was 98%; however, only 35% correctly understood the characteristics of the FFC. Similarly, in the survey of 4 year after the introduction, only 42% of dietitians correctly answered the characteristics. At 4 year after, 56% of dietitians currently or previously have used the FFC. The dietitians who had been consulted about the use of the FFC accounted for 22% and about the adverse events accounted for 15%. The advice they gave at the consultation differed according to their experience of the use of the FFC. Of the ones who never used the FFC, 25% referred no information sources for the FFC. The place to educate primarily working dietitians needs to be prepared to let them provide appropriate information to consumers to support self-care including the appropriate use of the FFC.","PeriodicalId":54373,"journal":{"name":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","volume":"62 1","pages":"20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.62.20","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of dietitians is important for consumers to practice self-care, which includes the use of the "Foods with Function Claims (FFC)". In this study, a nationwide internet survey was conducted to clarify the understanding and attitudes of dietitians towards the FFC 1 year and 4 years after its introduction (Surveys were conducted in 2015 and 2019, respectively). In the survey of 1 year after the introduction, the ratio of recognition of the FFC was 98%; however, only 35% correctly understood the characteristics of the FFC. Similarly, in the survey of 4 year after the introduction, only 42% of dietitians correctly answered the characteristics. At 4 year after, 56% of dietitians currently or previously have used the FFC. The dietitians who had been consulted about the use of the FFC accounted for 22% and about the adverse events accounted for 15%. The advice they gave at the consultation differed according to their experience of the use of the FFC. Of the ones who never used the FFC, 25% referred no information sources for the FFC. The place to educate primarily working dietitians needs to be prepared to let them provide appropriate information to consumers to support self-care including the appropriate use of the FFC.
[营养师对“有功能声称的食物”的认识及态度]。
营养师的角色对消费者的自我护理很重要,其中包括使用“功能声明食品”。本研究在全国范围内进行了一项网络调查,以明确营养师对FFC引入1年和4年后的理解和态度(调查分别于2015年和2019年进行)。在引进后1年的调查中,FFC的认可率为98%;然而,只有35%的人正确理解FFC的特征。同样,在引进后4年的调查中,只有42%的营养师正确回答了这些特征。4年后,56%的营养师现在或以前使用FFC。咨询过FFC使用情况的营养师占22%,咨询过不良事件的营养师占15%。他们在谘询时所提供的意见,根据他们使用FFC的经验而有所不同。在那些从未使用过FFC的人中,25%的人没有提到FFC的信息来源。教育主要工作营养师的地方需要做好准备,让他们向消费者提供适当的信息,以支持自我保健,包括适当使用FFC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Hygiene and Safety Science
Food Hygiene and Safety Science Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信