Intradialytic Hemodynamic Instability and Delirium in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Erdem Baran
{"title":"Intradialytic Hemodynamic Instability and Delirium in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Erdem Baran","doi":"10.3390/brainsci16101091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) is common in critically ill patients and is frequently accompanied by delirium. Intradialytic hemodynamic instability, particularly hypotension, may impair cerebral perfusion; however, its quantitative relationship with delirium remains unclear. This study investigated the association between intradialytic hemodynamic instability and Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)-defined delirium in critically ill patients receiving RRT. <b>Methods:</b> This single-center retrospective study included 87 adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing RRT between September 2025 and May 2026. Delirium was assessed using the CAM-ICU. Intradialytic hemodynamic burden was quantified by the cumulative duration of mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg and the number of hypotensive episodes during RRT. Multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, and admission SOFA score were performed to evaluate the associations between hemodynamic parameters and delirium, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to assess their discriminative ability. <b>Results:</b> Of 87 patients, 46 (52.9%) were classified as CAM-ICU-positive for delirium. Patients with delirium had a longer cumulative duration of MAP < 65 mmHg (median, 36.0 vs. 5.0 min; <i>p</i> = 0.048) and more hypotensive episodes (median, 3.0 vs. 1.0; <i>p</i> = 0.032). These differences were no longer significant after normalization to the number of RRT sessions (<i>p</i> = 0.153 and <i>p</i> = 0.249). In addition, neither parameter showed a statistically significant association with delirium after adjustment for age, sex, and admission SOFA score. ROC analysis demonstrated limited discriminative ability (AUC, 0.62 and 0.63, respectively). Mechanical ventilation duration, ICU length of stay or ICU mortality did not show a statistically significant association with CAM-ICU positivity in the adjusted models. Sensitivity analyses using alternative functional forms for cumulative MAP < 65 mmHg duration, including log-transformed, categorical, and natural cubic spline models, did not show statistically significant associations with CAM-ICU positivity. <b>Conclusions:</b> Critically ill patients with delirium had greater cumulative intradialytic hypotensive burden; however, these differences were attenuated after accounting for the number of RRT sessions, and the hemodynamic parameters did not show statistically significant associations with delirium in the adjusted regression models. These findings suggest a potential relationship between intradialytic hemodynamic burden and delirium but do not establish an independent or causal association.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13702392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16101091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) is common in critically ill patients and is frequently accompanied by delirium. Intradialytic hemodynamic instability, particularly hypotension, may impair cerebral perfusion; however, its quantitative relationship with delirium remains unclear. This study investigated the association between intradialytic hemodynamic instability and Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)-defined delirium in critically ill patients receiving RRT. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 87 adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing RRT between September 2025 and May 2026. Delirium was assessed using the CAM-ICU. Intradialytic hemodynamic burden was quantified by the cumulative duration of mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg and the number of hypotensive episodes during RRT. Multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, and admission SOFA score were performed to evaluate the associations between hemodynamic parameters and delirium, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to assess their discriminative ability. Results: Of 87 patients, 46 (52.9%) were classified as CAM-ICU-positive for delirium. Patients with delirium had a longer cumulative duration of MAP < 65 mmHg (median, 36.0 vs. 5.0 min; p = 0.048) and more hypotensive episodes (median, 3.0 vs. 1.0; p = 0.032). These differences were no longer significant after normalization to the number of RRT sessions (p = 0.153 and p = 0.249). In addition, neither parameter showed a statistically significant association with delirium after adjustment for age, sex, and admission SOFA score. ROC analysis demonstrated limited discriminative ability (AUC, 0.62 and 0.63, respectively). Mechanical ventilation duration, ICU length of stay or ICU mortality did not show a statistically significant association with CAM-ICU positivity in the adjusted models. Sensitivity analyses using alternative functional forms for cumulative MAP < 65 mmHg duration, including log-transformed, categorical, and natural cubic spline models, did not show statistically significant associations with CAM-ICU positivity. Conclusions: Critically ill patients with delirium had greater cumulative intradialytic hypotensive burden; however, these differences were attenuated after accounting for the number of RRT sessions, and the hemodynamic parameters did not show statistically significant associations with delirium in the adjusted regression models. These findings suggest a potential relationship between intradialytic hemodynamic burden and delirium but do not establish an independent or causal association.

接受肾脏替代治疗的危重患者的透析内血流动力学不稳定和谵妄:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:急性肾损伤(AKI)需要肾脏替代治疗(RRT)在危重患者中很常见,并且经常伴有谵妄。血流动力学不稳定,特别是低血压,可能损害脑灌注;然而,其与谵妄的定量关系尚不清楚。本研究探讨了重症监护病房(CAM-ICU)定义的接受RRT治疗的危重患者谵妄的分析内血流动力学不稳定性与精神错乱评估方法之间的关系。方法:本单中心回顾性研究纳入了2025年9月至2026年5月期间接受RRT治疗的87例成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者。使用CAM-ICU评估谵妄。通过平均动脉压(MAP) < 65 mmHg的累计持续时间和RRT期间低血压发作次数来量化透析内血流动力学负担。采用多变量logistic回归分析,校正年龄、性别和入院SOFA评分,评估血流动力学参数与谵妄之间的关系,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估其判别能力。结果:87例患者中46例(52.9%)为cam - icu阳性谵妄。谵妄患者MAP < 65 mmHg的累计持续时间更长(中位数,36.0 vs. 5.0 min; p = 0.048),低血压发作次数更多(中位数,3.0 vs. 1.0; p = 0.032)。对RRT会话数进行归一化后,这些差异不再显著(p = 0.153和p = 0.249)。此外,在调整年龄、性别和入院SOFA评分后,两项参数均未显示与谵妄有统计学意义的关联。ROC分析显示其判别能力有限(AUC分别为0.62和0.63)。在调整后的模型中,机械通气时间、ICU住院时间或ICU死亡率与CAM-ICU阳性无统计学意义相关。使用其他函数形式(包括对数转换、分类和自然三次样条模型)对累积MAP < 65 mmHg持续时间进行敏感性分析,没有显示与CAM-ICU阳性有统计学意义的关联。结论:危重患者合并谵妄有较大的累积性血压负荷;然而,在考虑了RRT的次数后,这些差异减弱了,并且在调整后的回归模型中,血流动力学参数与谵妄没有统计学上的显著关联。这些研究结果表明,在分析血液动力学负担和谵妄之间存在潜在的关系,但没有建立独立或因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书