{"title":"Community Feedback on Adapting a Training to Improve Social Reactions to Sexual Violence for LGBTQ+ Young Adults.","authors":"Jessamyn Moxie, Jasmine Temple, Yasmine Paige, Rhoen Hoff, Parth Vyas, Sage Rowe, Itati Ramirez, Annabelle Harvey, Danny Valdes, Katie M Edwards, Rachel Jackson-Gordon, Annelise Mennicke","doi":"10.1080/08964289.2026.2683384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual violence disproportionately impacts LGBTQ+ young adults, yet few interventions have been tailored to equip their communities with the skills to respond supportively to disclosures of sexual violence. Social reactions, or how a person responds to a disclosure, play a critical role in shaping survivors' health outcomes, such as psychological wellbeing. The purpose of this project was to identify what adaptations needed to be made to an existing social reactions intervention (Supporting Survivors and Self; SSS) so that SSS is relevant and impactful for LGBTQ+ communities. Using a theater testing approach, we conducted 7 virtual theater testing groups (<i>N</i> = 29 participants) with LGBTQ+ individuals 18-25 years old, to gather feedback on tailoring SSS content. We analyzed theater test data with content then thematic analyses. Participants emphasized the need for content to be representative of LGBTQ+ definitions of sexual violence. They also highlighted the importance of addressing stigma and discrimination- both internalized and external-with the desire to create safe spaces that reduce stigma and isolation while fostering greater community building. LGBTQ+-inclusive programs addressing social reactions to sexual violence may benefit not only LGBTQ+ individuals but expand representations of supportive behaviors (e.g. avoiding stigmatizing questions or language) and forms of sexual violence (e.g. \"outing\"). Federal funding terminations add challenges for testing an adaptation of this program and other LGBTQ+-inclusive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55395,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Medicine","volume":"52 3-4","pages":"260-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2026.2683384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sexual violence disproportionately impacts LGBTQ+ young adults, yet few interventions have been tailored to equip their communities with the skills to respond supportively to disclosures of sexual violence. Social reactions, or how a person responds to a disclosure, play a critical role in shaping survivors' health outcomes, such as psychological wellbeing. The purpose of this project was to identify what adaptations needed to be made to an existing social reactions intervention (Supporting Survivors and Self; SSS) so that SSS is relevant and impactful for LGBTQ+ communities. Using a theater testing approach, we conducted 7 virtual theater testing groups (N = 29 participants) with LGBTQ+ individuals 18-25 years old, to gather feedback on tailoring SSS content. We analyzed theater test data with content then thematic analyses. Participants emphasized the need for content to be representative of LGBTQ+ definitions of sexual violence. They also highlighted the importance of addressing stigma and discrimination- both internalized and external-with the desire to create safe spaces that reduce stigma and isolation while fostering greater community building. LGBTQ+-inclusive programs addressing social reactions to sexual violence may benefit not only LGBTQ+ individuals but expand representations of supportive behaviors (e.g. avoiding stigmatizing questions or language) and forms of sexual violence (e.g. "outing"). Federal funding terminations add challenges for testing an adaptation of this program and other LGBTQ+-inclusive interventions.
期刊介绍:
Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, which fosters and promotes the exchange of knowledge and the advancement of theory in the field of behavioral medicine, including but not limited to understandings of disease prevention, health promotion, health disparities, identification of health risk factors, and interventions designed to reduce health risks, ameliorate health disparities, enhancing all aspects of health. The journal seeks to advance knowledge and theory in these domains in all segments of the population and across the lifespan, in local, national, and global contexts, and with an emphasis on the synergies that exist between biological, psychological, psychosocial, and structural factors as they related to these areas of study and across health states.
Behavioral Medicine publishes original empirical studies (experimental and observational research studies, quantitative and qualitative studies, evaluation studies) as well as clinical/case studies. The journal also publishes review articles, which provide systematic evaluations of the literature and propose alternative and innovative theoretical paradigms, as well as brief reports and responses to articles previously published in Behavioral Medicine.