Development and validation of a food photography atlas for portion size estimation of traditional Croatian dishes in adults.

IF 5.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Frontiers in Nutrition Pub Date : 2026-10-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnut.2026.1956906
Ivana Rumbak, Ana Ilić, Tea Knezović, Ana Jurčić, Martina Pavlić, Lidija Šoher, Daniela Čačić Kenjerić, Jasna Pucarin-Cvetković, Darja Sokolić
{"title":"Development and validation of a food photography atlas for portion size estimation of traditional Croatian dishes in adults.","authors":"Ivana Rumbak, Ana Ilić, Tea Knezović, Ana Jurčić, Martina Pavlić, Lidija Šoher, Daniela Čačić Kenjerić, Jasna Pucarin-Cvetković, Darja Sokolić","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2026.1956906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate portion size estimation is an important component of dietary assessment. Food photography atlases, which are among the most commonly used portion size measurement aids, are designed to take into account the cultural context and dietary patterns of the target population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate food photography atlas of traditional Croatian dishes for adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 30 dishes were selected, in accordance with the gastronomic regions defined by Croatian National Tourist Board. The portion sizes were determined using data from the first Croatian national food consumption survey of the adult population, conducted in accordance with the EU Menu methodology. The photographs were validated by comparing them with the actual dishes served to 110 participants over a three-day period. Validity assessment included mean differences between actual and estimated portion sizes using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, correlations between actual and estimated portion sizes, Bland- Altman limits of agreement, and quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 30 selected traditional dishes, no significant differences between actual and estimated portion sizes were observed for 46.7% of dishes, whereas portion sizes were underestimated for 30% and overestimated for 23.3%. For half of the dishes, at least 50% of the estimates were within ±10% of the differences between actual and estimated portion size. Spearman's correlation showed a strong association between actual and estimated portion size for all 30 dishes. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between actual and estimated portion sizes, with low systematic bias and narrow limits of agreement for single-unit and countable dishes. In 66.7% of dishes, more than half of the estimations were correct, while across all 30 dishes the proportion of distant estimations ranged from 0.0 to 31.0%. Quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa indicated almost perfect agreement for 29 dishes and substantial agreement for one dish.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results support the validity of the food photography atlas for estimating portion sizes of traditional dishes among adults in Croatia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"13 ","pages":"1956906"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13683142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2026.1956906","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate portion size estimation is an important component of dietary assessment. Food photography atlases, which are among the most commonly used portion size measurement aids, are designed to take into account the cultural context and dietary patterns of the target population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate food photography atlas of traditional Croatian dishes for adults.

Methods: The 30 dishes were selected, in accordance with the gastronomic regions defined by Croatian National Tourist Board. The portion sizes were determined using data from the first Croatian national food consumption survey of the adult population, conducted in accordance with the EU Menu methodology. The photographs were validated by comparing them with the actual dishes served to 110 participants over a three-day period. Validity assessment included mean differences between actual and estimated portion sizes using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, correlations between actual and estimated portion sizes, Bland- Altman limits of agreement, and quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa.

Results: Of the 30 selected traditional dishes, no significant differences between actual and estimated portion sizes were observed for 46.7% of dishes, whereas portion sizes were underestimated for 30% and overestimated for 23.3%. For half of the dishes, at least 50% of the estimates were within ±10% of the differences between actual and estimated portion size. Spearman's correlation showed a strong association between actual and estimated portion size for all 30 dishes. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between actual and estimated portion sizes, with low systematic bias and narrow limits of agreement for single-unit and countable dishes. In 66.7% of dishes, more than half of the estimations were correct, while across all 30 dishes the proportion of distant estimations ranged from 0.0 to 31.0%. Quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa indicated almost perfect agreement for 29 dishes and substantial agreement for one dish.

Conclusion: These results support the validity of the food photography atlas for estimating portion sizes of traditional dishes among adults in Croatia.

开发和验证的食物摄影地图集的份量估计传统克罗地亚菜在成人。
背景:准确的份量估算是膳食评估的重要组成部分。食物摄影地图集是最常用的份量测量辅助工具之一,其设计考虑了目标人群的文化背景和饮食模式。因此,本研究的目的是为成人开发和验证克罗地亚传统菜肴的食物摄影地图集。方法:根据克罗地亚国家旅游局划定的美食区域,选取30个菜品。份量是根据克罗地亚第一次全国成年人口食品消费调查的数据确定的,该调查是按照欧盟菜单方法进行的。通过将照片与110名参与者在三天内品尝的实际菜肴进行比较,这些照片得到了验证。效度评估包括使用Wilcoxon sign -rank检验的实际和估计分量之间的平均差异、实际和估计分量之间的相关性、Bland- Altman一致性极限和二次加权Cohen's kappa。结果:在选定的30道传统菜肴中,46.7%的菜肴的实际份量和估计份量之间没有显著差异,而30%的菜肴的份量被低估,23.3%的菜肴的份量被高估。对于一半的菜肴,至少有50%的估计量在实际份量和估计份量之间的误差在±10%以内。斯皮尔曼的相关性表明,所有30道菜的实际份量和估计份量之间存在很强的关联。Bland-Altman分析表明,实际份量和估计份量之间的一致性很好,对于单单位和可计数的菜肴,系统偏差较低,一致性限制较窄。在66.7%的菜肴中,超过一半的估计是正确的,而在所有30道菜中,遥远估计的比例从0.0到31.0%不等。二次加权科恩kappa表明29道菜几乎完全一致,一道菜基本一致。结论:这些结果支持食物摄影地图集的有效性,以估计克罗地亚成年人传统菜肴的份量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers in Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
2891
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health. Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书