Psychometric Properties of the Dyslexia Referral Checklist for English- and Spanish-Speaking Children

IF 2.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Yusra Ahmed, Michael A. Assel, Michael P. Mesa, Sarah Surrain, Tricia A. Zucker, Vibhuti Bhavsar, April Crawford
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Dyslexia Referral Checklist for English- and Spanish-Speaking Children","authors":"Yusra Ahmed, Michael A. Assel, Michael P. Mesa, Sarah Surrain, Tricia A. Zucker, Vibhuti Bhavsar, April Crawford","doi":"10.1177/00222194261490114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dyslexia affects 5%–15% of children, yet only 32% of U.S. fourth graders read proficiently. Early intervention is crucial for addressing reading difficulty (RD) risk. While most states require early dyslexia screening, there is a need for better tools and approaches for identifying students who may benefit from further evaluation, especially for students from Spanish language backgrounds. This study investigates the integration of teacher reports and direct assessments to enhance the accuracy of early identification. We evaluated the psychometric properties and concurrent validity of the Dyslexia Referral Checklist (DRC) across English and Spanish versions in kindergarten (KG), its predictive validity in first grade (G1), and the potential of the DRC to enhance early identification of RD when combined with validated screening measures in large samples of English-speaking (KG <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 56,681, G1 <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 30,534) and Spanish-speaking (KG <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 9,097, G1 <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 4,341) students. The DRC demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = 0.97–0.99), strong concurrent validity with dyslexia screeners ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">r</jats:italic> = .|72|–.|79|), and significant incremental prediction of G1 outcomes ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">d</jats:italic> = |0.01|–|0.28|; area under the curve [AUC] = .83–.94). Classification accuracy against literacy measures aligned with ranges reported for existing dyslexia checklists. These findings support the DRC as a promising, no-cost supplement to universal screening with utility for English- and Spanish-speaking populations.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194261490114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dyslexia affects 5%–15% of children, yet only 32% of U.S. fourth graders read proficiently. Early intervention is crucial for addressing reading difficulty (RD) risk. While most states require early dyslexia screening, there is a need for better tools and approaches for identifying students who may benefit from further evaluation, especially for students from Spanish language backgrounds. This study investigates the integration of teacher reports and direct assessments to enhance the accuracy of early identification. We evaluated the psychometric properties and concurrent validity of the Dyslexia Referral Checklist (DRC) across English and Spanish versions in kindergarten (KG), its predictive validity in first grade (G1), and the potential of the DRC to enhance early identification of RD when combined with validated screening measures in large samples of English-speaking (KG n = 56,681, G1 n = 30,534) and Spanish-speaking (KG n = 9,097, G1 n = 4,341) students. The DRC demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = 0.97–0.99), strong concurrent validity with dyslexia screeners ( r = .|72|–.|79|), and significant incremental prediction of G1 outcomes ( d = |0.01|–|0.28|; area under the curve [AUC] = .83–.94). Classification accuracy against literacy measures aligned with ranges reported for existing dyslexia checklists. These findings support the DRC as a promising, no-cost supplement to universal screening with utility for English- and Spanish-speaking populations.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Learning Disabilities (JLD), a multidisciplinary, international publication, presents work and comments related to learning disabilities. Initial consideration of a manuscript depends upon (a) the relevance and usefulness of the content to the readership; (b) how the manuscript compares to other articles dealing with similar content on pertinent variables (e.g., sample size, research design, review of literature); (c) clarity of writing style; and (d) the author"s adherence to APA guidelines. Articles cover such fields as education, psychology, neurology, medicine, law, and counseling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书