Emotional Competence in Children With Language and Learning Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Oriol Verdaguer-Ribas, Nadia Ahufinger, Jaume March-Llanes, Jorge Moya-Higueras, Coral Mayo, Mari Aguilera
{"title":"Emotional Competence in Children With Language and Learning Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Oriol Verdaguer-Ribas, Nadia Ahufinger, Jaume March-Llanes, Jorge Moya-Higueras, Coral Mayo, Mari Aguilera","doi":"10.1177/00222194261491764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children with language and learning disorders (LLDs)—including developmental language disorder (DLD), dyslexia, and dyscalculia—often experience emotional difficulties, yet no previous synthesis has quantified these challenges across all the dimensions of emotional competence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine whether children with LLDs differ from their typically developing (TD) peers in emotional identification, understanding, regulation, and expression. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, 855 studies were initially screened by two researchers. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 42 studies were finally included, with 33 contributing to a meta-analysis. Multilevel random-effects meta-analytic models were used to calculate standardized mean differences between children with LLDs and TD peers across each emotional competence dimension. Moderator analyses explored the effects of diagnostic subtype, non-verbal IQ (NVIQ), age, and sex. Children with LLDs showed significant deficits in emotional identification, understanding, and expression, and a tendency toward poorer emotion regulation compared to TD peers. Moderator analyses revealed that NVIQ significantly influenced only emotional understanding. Overall, emotional competence is compromised in children with LLDs, which has implications for educational and clinical practice. These findings support the integration of emotion-focused interventions in evaluations and treatments for children with learning and language difficulties.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194261491764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children with language and learning disorders (LLDs)—including developmental language disorder (DLD), dyslexia, and dyscalculia—often experience emotional difficulties, yet no previous synthesis has quantified these challenges across all the dimensions of emotional competence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine whether children with LLDs differ from their typically developing (TD) peers in emotional identification, understanding, regulation, and expression. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, 855 studies were initially screened by two researchers. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 42 studies were finally included, with 33 contributing to a meta-analysis. Multilevel random-effects meta-analytic models were used to calculate standardized mean differences between children with LLDs and TD peers across each emotional competence dimension. Moderator analyses explored the effects of diagnostic subtype, non-verbal IQ (NVIQ), age, and sex. Children with LLDs showed significant deficits in emotional identification, understanding, and expression, and a tendency toward poorer emotion regulation compared to TD peers. Moderator analyses revealed that NVIQ significantly influenced only emotional understanding. Overall, emotional competence is compromised in children with LLDs, which has implications for educational and clinical practice. These findings support the integration of emotion-focused interventions in evaluations and treatments for children with learning and language difficulties.
患有语言和学习障碍(LLDs)的儿童-包括发展性语言障碍(DLD),阅读障碍和计算障碍-经常经历情感困难,但之前没有综合量化这些挑战在情感能力的所有维度。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究lld儿童在情感认同、理解、调节和表达方面是否与正常发育儿童(TD)不同。根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA) 2020指南的首选报告项目,两名研究人员最初筛选了855项研究。在应用纳入和排除标准后,最终纳入了42项研究,其中33项用于荟萃分析。采用多水平随机效应元分析模型计算低障碍儿童和TD同伴在每个情绪能力维度上的标准化平均差异。调节分析探讨了诊断亚型、非语言智商(NVIQ)、年龄和性别的影响。与TD同龄人相比,LLDs儿童在情绪识别、理解和表达方面存在显著缺陷,并且倾向于较差的情绪调节。调节分析显示,NVIQ仅对情绪理解有显著影响。总体而言,情感能力受损的儿童与有限责任障碍,这对教育和临床实践的影响。这些发现支持在评估和治疗学习和语言障碍儿童时整合以情绪为中心的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Learning Disabilities (JLD), a multidisciplinary, international publication, presents work and comments related to learning disabilities. Initial consideration of a manuscript depends upon (a) the relevance and usefulness of the content to the readership; (b) how the manuscript compares to other articles dealing with similar content on pertinent variables (e.g., sample size, research design, review of literature); (c) clarity of writing style; and (d) the author"s adherence to APA guidelines. Articles cover such fields as education, psychology, neurology, medicine, law, and counseling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书