Dietary Supplement Intake, Adverse Effects, and Reasons for Use by Military Service Members: A Narrative Review and Proposal for an Adverse Effects Surveillance System.

IF 9.2
Adrienne Hatch-McChesney, Joseph J Knapik, Asma S Bukhari, Lauren A Thompson, Harris R Lieberman
{"title":"Dietary Supplement Intake, Adverse Effects, and Reasons for Use by Military Service Members: A Narrative Review and Proposal for an Adverse Effects Surveillance System.","authors":"Adrienne Hatch-McChesney, Joseph J Knapik, Asma S Bukhari, Lauren A Thompson, Harris R Lieberman","doi":"10.1016/j.advnut.2026.100757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensive use of dietary supplements (DSs) by civilians and military service members (SMs) raises safety and efficacy issues. Adequate surveillance systems to detect dangerous DSs in the US marketplace do not exist. This paper reviews studies on SM DS use, safety, adverse effects (AEs), reasons for use, and knowledge as well as SM attitudes regarding DS safety, efficacy, and regulations. The findings are compared to US civilians and foreign SMs. Use of DSs by SMs has increased, from 53% (2006-2007) to 76% (2018-2019) in the Army. Compared to civilians, SMs use more DSs, and consume more potentially dangerous DSs, especially those purported to enhance physical performance and weight loss. The most commonly used DSs by SMs are multivitamins/multiminerals, proteins/amino acids, combination products, and individual vitamins/minerals. Self-reported prevalence of AEs by SMs is about 18%, and highest among those using combination products and prohormones which contain substances that could cause AEs themselves or interact with other DSs or medications. Most SMs using DSs believe they are safe (67%) and efficacious (71%); many (38%) believe government regulations ensure safety. Longitudinal studies indicate experiencing AEs does not deter SMs from DS use, since most AEs appear minor and may indicate the DS has the expected effects. Similar civilian data are not available regarding use of potentially dangerous DSs, attitudes, and AEs. Improved oversight, education, and prevention of AEs from DSs is necessary and could include a continuous surveillance program of SMs to detect potentially dangerous DSs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72101,"journal":{"name":"Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"100757"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2026.100757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive use of dietary supplements (DSs) by civilians and military service members (SMs) raises safety and efficacy issues. Adequate surveillance systems to detect dangerous DSs in the US marketplace do not exist. This paper reviews studies on SM DS use, safety, adverse effects (AEs), reasons for use, and knowledge as well as SM attitudes regarding DS safety, efficacy, and regulations. The findings are compared to US civilians and foreign SMs. Use of DSs by SMs has increased, from 53% (2006-2007) to 76% (2018-2019) in the Army. Compared to civilians, SMs use more DSs, and consume more potentially dangerous DSs, especially those purported to enhance physical performance and weight loss. The most commonly used DSs by SMs are multivitamins/multiminerals, proteins/amino acids, combination products, and individual vitamins/minerals. Self-reported prevalence of AEs by SMs is about 18%, and highest among those using combination products and prohormones which contain substances that could cause AEs themselves or interact with other DSs or medications. Most SMs using DSs believe they are safe (67%) and efficacious (71%); many (38%) believe government regulations ensure safety. Longitudinal studies indicate experiencing AEs does not deter SMs from DS use, since most AEs appear minor and may indicate the DS has the expected effects. Similar civilian data are not available regarding use of potentially dangerous DSs, attitudes, and AEs. Improved oversight, education, and prevention of AEs from DSs is necessary and could include a continuous surveillance program of SMs to detect potentially dangerous DSs.

膳食补充剂的摄入量,不良影响,以及军事人员使用的原因:不良影响监测系统的叙述回顾和建议。
膳食补充剂(DSs)的广泛使用平民和军人(SMs)提出了安全性和有效性问题。在美国市场上,没有足够的监测系统来检测危险的DSs。本文综述了SM - DS的使用、安全性、不良反应、使用原因、SM对DS安全性、有效性和法规的认识和态度等方面的研究。研究结果与美国平民和外国短信进行了比较。SMs对决策系统的使用从53%(2006-2007年)增加到76%(2018-2019年)。与普通人相比,SMs使用更多的DSs,并且消耗更多潜在危险的DSs,特别是那些据称可以提高身体表现和减肥的DSs。SMs最常用的DSs是多种维生素/多种矿物质、蛋白质/氨基酸、组合产品和单个维生素/矿物质。通过短信自我报告的不良反应发生率约为18%,在使用组合产品和原激素的人群中最高,这些产品和原激素本身含有可能导致不良反应的物质,或与其他DSs或药物相互作用。大多数使用DSs的短信认为它们是安全的(67%)和有效的(71%);许多人(38%)认为政府法规确保安全。纵向研究表明,经历不良事件并不会阻止SMs使用DS,因为大多数不良事件看起来很轻微,可能表明DS具有预期的效果。类似的民用数据没有关于潜在危险的DSs、态度和ae的使用。改进监督、教育和预防来自DSs的ae是必要的,可以包括SMs的持续监测计划,以发现潜在的危险DSs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书