Integrated dual carbon source and TCA intermediate supplementation in fed-batch fermentation of CHO cells for reduced lactate and ammonia accumulation and improved IgG1 monoclonal antibody titre.
IF 4.3 3区 生物学Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
{"title":"Integrated dual carbon source and TCA intermediate supplementation in fed-batch fermentation of CHO cells for reduced lactate and ammonia accumulation and improved IgG1 monoclonal antibody titre.","authors":"Ashwin Naidu, Krutika Padhye, Prajakta Dandekar, Ratnesh Jain","doi":"10.1007/s00449-026-03444-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are the workhorse of biopharmaceutical manufacturing, yet lactate and ammonia accumulation remain persistent bottlenecks that compromise cell viability, productivity, and product quality. To address this, we present an integrated feeding strategy systematically combining Ala-Gln, TCA intermediates, and glucose-galactose dual carbon feed evaluated head-to-head across four defined fed-batch conditions for CHO cultures producing an IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb). Conventional L-glutamine was replaced with L-alanyl-glutamine (Ala-Gln) to curb spontaneous ammonia release, while a customized \"efficient feed mix\" enriched with 2× TCA cycle intermediates and branched-chain amino acids combined with a glucose-galactose co-feed (2 mM glucose + 30 mM galactose) was introduced upon glucose depletion. Four fed-batch conditions were evaluated: a glutamine control (FB-01), Ala-Gln alone (FB-02), Ala-Gln with TCA intermediates (FB-03), and the complete integrated strategy (FB-04). FB-04 delivered an > 83% reduction in peak lactate (4.0 mM) and 80% reduction in ammonia (< 2.0 mM), sustained cell viability above 85% through day 11, and achieved a 93% higher mAb titre (1.72 g/L) with peak Viable count density (VCD) of 39 × 10⁶ cells/mL. Glycosylation profiles (19.0% galactosylation) remained aligned with innovator benchmarks. This study presents the first direct head-to-head benchmarking of Ala-Gln substitution, TCA intermediate supplementation, and galactose co-feeding in a single CHO fed-batch platform, demonstrating their combined metabolic and glycosylation benefits against a glutamine control.</p>","PeriodicalId":9024,"journal":{"name":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-026-03444-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are the workhorse of biopharmaceutical manufacturing, yet lactate and ammonia accumulation remain persistent bottlenecks that compromise cell viability, productivity, and product quality. To address this, we present an integrated feeding strategy systematically combining Ala-Gln, TCA intermediates, and glucose-galactose dual carbon feed evaluated head-to-head across four defined fed-batch conditions for CHO cultures producing an IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb). Conventional L-glutamine was replaced with L-alanyl-glutamine (Ala-Gln) to curb spontaneous ammonia release, while a customized "efficient feed mix" enriched with 2× TCA cycle intermediates and branched-chain amino acids combined with a glucose-galactose co-feed (2 mM glucose + 30 mM galactose) was introduced upon glucose depletion. Four fed-batch conditions were evaluated: a glutamine control (FB-01), Ala-Gln alone (FB-02), Ala-Gln with TCA intermediates (FB-03), and the complete integrated strategy (FB-04). FB-04 delivered an > 83% reduction in peak lactate (4.0 mM) and 80% reduction in ammonia (< 2.0 mM), sustained cell viability above 85% through day 11, and achieved a 93% higher mAb titre (1.72 g/L) with peak Viable count density (VCD) of 39 × 10⁶ cells/mL. Glycosylation profiles (19.0% galactosylation) remained aligned with innovator benchmarks. This study presents the first direct head-to-head benchmarking of Ala-Gln substitution, TCA intermediate supplementation, and galactose co-feeding in a single CHO fed-batch platform, demonstrating their combined metabolic and glycosylation benefits against a glutamine control.
期刊介绍:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering provides an international peer-reviewed forum to facilitate the discussion between engineering and biological science to find efficient solutions in the development and improvement of bioprocesses. The aim of the journal is to focus more attention on the multidisciplinary approaches for integrative bioprocess design. Of special interest are the rational manipulation of biosystems through metabolic engineering techniques to provide new biocatalysts as well as the model based design of bioprocesses (up-stream processing, bioreactor operation and downstream processing) that will lead to new and sustainable production processes.
Contributions are targeted at new approaches for rational and evolutive design of cellular systems by taking into account the environment and constraints of technical production processes, integration of recombinant technology and process design, as well as new hybrid intersections such as bioinformatics and process systems engineering. Manuscripts concerning the design, simulation, experimental validation, control, and economic as well as ecological evaluation of novel processes using biosystems or parts thereof (e.g., enzymes, microorganisms, mammalian cells, plant cells, or tissue), their related products, or technical devices are also encouraged.
The Editors will consider papers for publication based on novelty, their impact on biotechnological production and their contribution to the advancement of bioprocess and biosystems engineering science. Submission of papers dealing with routine aspects of bioprocess engineering (e.g., routine application of established methodologies, and description of established equipment) are discouraged.