Association between Yo-yo intermittent recovery test, physiological markers of endurance performance, and buffering capacity in professional soccer players.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
R C A Ferreira, V O Silvino, L V Vilhena, M A P Dos Santos, D M L do Prado
{"title":"Association between Yo-yo intermittent recovery test, physiological markers of endurance performance, and buffering capacity in professional soccer players.","authors":"R C A Ferreira, V O Silvino, L V Vilhena, M A P Dos Santos, D M L do Prado","doi":"10.1590/1414-431X2026e15230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (YYIR1) is widely recognized as a reliable tool for assessing intermittent endurance and aerobic capacity in team sports athletes. This study aims to verify the association between YYIR1 and physiological markers of endurance performance in professional soccer players, as well as the relationship between metabolic buffering capacity, metabolic acidosis tolerance, and YYIR1 total distance. Twenty-six professional soccer athletes (26.3±4.98 years, 76.4±8.96 kg, 178±6.52 cm, 54.1±4.85 mL·kg-1·min-1 V̇O2max) performed the YYIR1 and underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on a treadmill in order to assess their ventilatory thresholds (aerobic threshold (AT), respiratory compensation point (RCP), and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max)), buffering capacity, and tolerance to metabolic acidosis. Correlation analyses revealed that the YYIR1 distance was significantly associated with maximal aerobic speed (r=0.542, P=0.006) and V̇O2max (r=0.492, P=0.015), but not with AT or RCP. Position-specific differences were observed in relative acidosis tolerance capacity, with midfielders presenting higher values than defenders (P=0.018, η2=0.294), whereas no significant differences were noted for relative buffering or YYIR1 distance across positions. In conclusion, maximal aerobic speed and V̇O2max were the strongest predictors of YYIR1 performance in professional soccer players, outperforming submaximal thresholds such as AT and RCP. Moreover, positional differences in acidosis tolerance were identified, as midfielders demonstrated greater relative acidosis tolerance capacity compared to defenders.</p>","PeriodicalId":9088,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research","volume":"59 ","pages":"e15230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13660868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X2026e15230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (YYIR1) is widely recognized as a reliable tool for assessing intermittent endurance and aerobic capacity in team sports athletes. This study aims to verify the association between YYIR1 and physiological markers of endurance performance in professional soccer players, as well as the relationship between metabolic buffering capacity, metabolic acidosis tolerance, and YYIR1 total distance. Twenty-six professional soccer athletes (26.3±4.98 years, 76.4±8.96 kg, 178±6.52 cm, 54.1±4.85 mL·kg-1·min-1 V̇O2max) performed the YYIR1 and underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on a treadmill in order to assess their ventilatory thresholds (aerobic threshold (AT), respiratory compensation point (RCP), and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max)), buffering capacity, and tolerance to metabolic acidosis. Correlation analyses revealed that the YYIR1 distance was significantly associated with maximal aerobic speed (r=0.542, P=0.006) and V̇O2max (r=0.492, P=0.015), but not with AT or RCP. Position-specific differences were observed in relative acidosis tolerance capacity, with midfielders presenting higher values than defenders (P=0.018, η2=0.294), whereas no significant differences were noted for relative buffering or YYIR1 distance across positions. In conclusion, maximal aerobic speed and V̇O2max were the strongest predictors of YYIR1 performance in professional soccer players, outperforming submaximal thresholds such as AT and RCP. Moreover, positional differences in acidosis tolerance were identified, as midfielders demonstrated greater relative acidosis tolerance capacity compared to defenders.

职业足球运动员悠悠球间歇恢复测试、耐力表现生理指标与缓冲能力的关系。
溜溜球间歇恢复测试1级(YYIR1)被广泛认为是评估团队运动运动员间歇耐力和有氧能力的可靠工具。本研究旨在验证YYIR1与职业足球运动员耐力表现生理指标之间的关系,以及代谢缓冲能力、代谢性酸中毒耐受性与YYIR1总距离之间的关系。26名职业足球运动员(26.3±4.98岁,76.4±8.96 kg, 178±6.52 cm, 54.1±4.85 mL·kg-1·min-1 V (O2max))进行YYIR1测试,并在跑步机上进行心肺运动试验(CPET),以评估其通气阈值(有氧阈值(AT)、呼吸代偿点(RCP)、最大耗氧量(V (O2max))、缓冲能力和代谢性酸中毒耐受性。相关分析显示,YYIR1距离与最大有氧运动速度(r=0.542, P=0.006)和V / O2max (r=0.492, P=0.015)显著相关,而与AT和RCP无关。在相对酸中毒耐受能力方面存在位置差异,中场球员高于后卫球员(P=0.018, η2=0.294),而相对缓冲能力和YYIR1距离在不同位置上没有显著差异。综上所述,最大有氧速度和V * O2max是职业足球运动员YYIR1表现的最强预测因子,优于亚最大阈值如AT和RCP。此外,还发现了酸中毒耐受性的位置差异,与后卫相比,中场球员表现出更大的酸中毒耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, founded by Michel Jamra, is edited and published monthly by the Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC), a federation of Brazilian scientific societies: - Sociedade Brasileira de Biofísica (SBBf) - Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacologia e Terapêutica Experimental (SBFTE) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fisiologia (SBFis) - Sociedade Brasileira de Imunologia (SBI) - Sociedade Brasileira de Investigação Clínica (SBIC) - Sociedade Brasileira de Neurociências e Comportamento (SBNeC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书