Vision In SyndrOmic Neurodevelopmental disorders-15q (VISiON-15q) study: eye tracking to supplement clinical examination for detection of cerebral/cortical visual impairment in children with Angelman and Duplication of 15q Syndromes.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-09-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1953706
Melinda Y Chang, Sydney Jacobs, Katherine Granger, Anna Achenbach, Charlotte DiStefano, Shafali S Jeste
{"title":"Vision In SyndrOmic Neurodevelopmental disorders-15q (VISiON-15q) study: eye tracking to supplement clinical examination for detection of cerebral/cortical visual impairment in children with Angelman and Duplication of 15q Syndromes.","authors":"Melinda Y Chang, Sydney Jacobs, Katherine Granger, Anna Achenbach, Charlotte DiStefano, Shafali S Jeste","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2026.1953706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify children with Angelman syndrome (AS) and Duplication of 15q (Dup15q) syndrome who have cerebral/cortical visual impairment (CVI) using clinical examination combined with eye tracking.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-five children (12 months to 12 years old) with AS and Dup15q syndrome, collectively termed 15q disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All participants underwent complete pediatric neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation, including assessment of visual acuity using the Visual Behavior Scale (VBS) and Teller acuity cards. The Higher Visual Function Question Inventory (HVFQI) was administered to assess parental report of behaviors suggestive of CVI. Eye tracking was performed in participants who were able to complete accurate calibration. Participants were also administered the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Visual Reception scale, as well as non-visual subscales. Parents completed the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 3<sup>rd</sup> ed. (VABS-III) and Children's Visual Function Questionnaire (CVFQ) to measure adaptive function and vision-specific quality of life, respectively.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Proportion of participants classified as having diagnosis or high suspicion of CVI (15q-CVI-DHS) based on multimodal visual assessments; association between CVI status and MSEL, VABS-III, and CVFQ scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 of 25 (60%) of 15q participants were classified as 15q-CVI-DHS. Of these, 6 (40%) were classified based on eye tracking alone. Compared to children with low suspicion of CVI, children in the 15q-CVI-DHS group had lower MSEL visual reception (17.6 ± 12.4 vs. 43.9 ± 25.7, <i>p</i> = 0.024), fine motor (21.3 ± 14.1 vs. 38.6 ± 20.6, <i>p</i> = 0.044), and verbal (15.0 ± 13.6 vs. 38.8 ± 28.0, <i>p</i> = 0.035) developmental quotients. Children in the 15q-CVI-DHS group also had lower CVFQ scores (overall 0.60 ± 0.18 vs. 0.82 ± 0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.022), without significant differences in VABS-III composite or domain scores.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Children with 15q disorders had a high rate of CVI or CVI suspect diagnosis, which was detected by eye tracking alone in 40% of cases. CVI was associated with worse vision-specific quality of life and lower developmental scores on multiple non-visual domains in these children. Future studies are needed to substantiate these findings in a larger cohort and characterize differences between genetic subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"20 ","pages":"1953706"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1953706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify children with Angelman syndrome (AS) and Duplication of 15q (Dup15q) syndrome who have cerebral/cortical visual impairment (CVI) using clinical examination combined with eye tracking.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Participants: Twenty-five children (12 months to 12 years old) with AS and Dup15q syndrome, collectively termed 15q disorders.

Methods: All participants underwent complete pediatric neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation, including assessment of visual acuity using the Visual Behavior Scale (VBS) and Teller acuity cards. The Higher Visual Function Question Inventory (HVFQI) was administered to assess parental report of behaviors suggestive of CVI. Eye tracking was performed in participants who were able to complete accurate calibration. Participants were also administered the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Visual Reception scale, as well as non-visual subscales. Parents completed the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 3rd ed. (VABS-III) and Children's Visual Function Questionnaire (CVFQ) to measure adaptive function and vision-specific quality of life, respectively.

Main outcome measures: Proportion of participants classified as having diagnosis or high suspicion of CVI (15q-CVI-DHS) based on multimodal visual assessments; association between CVI status and MSEL, VABS-III, and CVFQ scores.

Results: 15 of 25 (60%) of 15q participants were classified as 15q-CVI-DHS. Of these, 6 (40%) were classified based on eye tracking alone. Compared to children with low suspicion of CVI, children in the 15q-CVI-DHS group had lower MSEL visual reception (17.6 ± 12.4 vs. 43.9 ± 25.7, p = 0.024), fine motor (21.3 ± 14.1 vs. 38.6 ± 20.6, p = 0.044), and verbal (15.0 ± 13.6 vs. 38.8 ± 28.0, p = 0.035) developmental quotients. Children in the 15q-CVI-DHS group also had lower CVFQ scores (overall 0.60 ± 0.18 vs. 0.82 ± 0.10, p = 0.022), without significant differences in VABS-III composite or domain scores.

Discussion: Children with 15q disorders had a high rate of CVI or CVI suspect diagnosis, which was detected by eye tracking alone in 40% of cases. CVI was associated with worse vision-specific quality of life and lower developmental scores on multiple non-visual domains in these children. Future studies are needed to substantiate these findings in a larger cohort and characterize differences between genetic subtypes.

视力综合征性神经发育障碍-15q (Vision -15q)研究:眼动追踪辅助临床检查检测Angelman综合征和重复15q综合征儿童的大脑/皮质视力障碍。
目的:采用临床检查结合眼动追踪的方法鉴别Angelman综合征(AS)和Dup15q综合征(Dup15q)患儿脑/皮质性视力障碍(CVI)。设计:前瞻性队列研究。参与者:25名患有AS和Dup15q综合征的儿童(12 个月至12 岁),统称为15q障碍。方法:所有受试者接受完整的儿童神经眼科评估,包括使用视觉行为量表(VBS)和泰勒视力卡评估视力。采用高级视觉功能问题量表(HVFQI)评估家长报告的提示CVI行为。对能够完成准确校准的参与者进行眼动追踪。参与者还接受了马伦早期学习量表(MSEL)视觉接受量表以及非视觉子量表。家长分别填写《Vineland适应行为量表第3版》(VABS-III)和《儿童视觉功能问卷》(CVFQ)来测量适应功能和视觉特异性生活质量。主要结局指标:根据多模态视觉评估,被归类为CVI诊断或高度怀疑的参与者比例(15q-CVI-DHS);CVI状态与MSEL、VABS-III和CVFQ评分之间的关系。结果:15q名参与者中有15 / 25(60%)被归类为15q- cvi - dhs。其中,6个(40%)仅根据眼动追踪进行分类。CVI怀疑较低的儿童相比,儿童15 q-cvi-dhs组毫秒视觉接收较低(17.6 ±12.4 vs 43.9  ± 25.7,p = 0.024),精细动作( 21.3±14.1 vs 38.6  ± 20.6,p = 0.044),和语言( 15.0±13.6 vs 38.8  ± 28.0,p = 0.035)发育商。15q-CVI-DHS组的儿童CVFQ评分也较低(总体0.60 ± 0.18 vs. 0.82 ± 0.10,p = 0.022),VABS-III复合评分或域评分无显著差异。讨论:15q障碍患儿CVI或CVI疑似诊断率较高,仅通过眼动追踪检测到CVI的病例占40%。在这些儿童中,CVI与较差的视觉特异性生活质量和较低的多个非视觉领域的发育评分有关。未来的研究需要在更大的队列中证实这些发现,并表征遗传亚型之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书