Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Heyndrickxia faecalisDSM 32016 (TechnoSpore50®) for calves for fattening/rearing, and other bovines, ovines, caprines, cervids and camelids at the corresponding developmental stage (Biochem Zusatzstoffe Handels- und Produktionsgesellschaft mbH).
Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López-Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Giovanna Martelli, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto-Maradona, Katerina Theodoridou, Vasileios Bampidis, Montserrat Anguita, Matteo Lorenzo Innocenti, Jordi Ortuño, Maria Mountricha
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of <i>Heyndrickxia faecalis</i>DSM 32016 (TechnoSpore50®) for calves for fattening/rearing, and other bovines, ovines, caprines, cervids and camelids at the corresponding developmental stage (Biochem Zusatzstoffe Handels- und Produktionsgesellschaft mbH).","authors":"Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López-Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Giovanna Martelli, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto-Maradona, Katerina Theodoridou, Vasileios Bampidis, Montserrat Anguita, Matteo Lorenzo Innocenti, Jordi Ortuño, Maria Mountricha","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of <i>Heyndrickxia faecalis</i> (formerly identified as <i>Weizmannia faecalis</i>) DSM 32016 (TechnoSpore50®) as a zootechnical feed additive (functional group: gut flora stabiliser) for calves for fattening/rearing, and other bovines, ovines, caprines, cervids and camelids at the corresponding developmental stage. The strain was earlier identified as belonging to <i>H. faecalis</i> species, showed no toxigenic potential, and harboured no acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. Therefore, based on previous assessments, the additive was considered safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. Regarding the user safety, the additive is not a skin/eye irritant but a skin and respiratory sensitizer. Inhalation and dermal exposure were considered a risk. The Panel concluded that the additive has the potential to be efficacious as a zootechnical feed additive for calves for fattening/rearing, other bovines, ovines, caprines, cervids and camelids at the corresponding developmental stage at 1 × 10<sup>9</sup> colony forming unit (CFU)/kg complete feed and 5 × 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/L water for drinking.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"24 10","pages":"e10353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13655969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Heyndrickxia faecalis (formerly identified as Weizmannia faecalis) DSM 32016 (TechnoSpore50®) as a zootechnical feed additive (functional group: gut flora stabiliser) for calves for fattening/rearing, and other bovines, ovines, caprines, cervids and camelids at the corresponding developmental stage. The strain was earlier identified as belonging to H. faecalis species, showed no toxigenic potential, and harboured no acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. Therefore, based on previous assessments, the additive was considered safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. Regarding the user safety, the additive is not a skin/eye irritant but a skin and respiratory sensitizer. Inhalation and dermal exposure were considered a risk. The Panel concluded that the additive has the potential to be efficacious as a zootechnical feed additive for calves for fattening/rearing, other bovines, ovines, caprines, cervids and camelids at the corresponding developmental stage at 1 × 109 colony forming unit (CFU)/kg complete feed and 5 × 108 CFU/L water for drinking.
期刊介绍:
The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.