{"title":"Tailoring high-cell-density fed-batch fermentation strategies to produce Russell's viper venom-specific single-domain antibody in E. coli.","authors":"Shivani Chauhan, Nimisha Chaudhary, Mohini Talwar, Shubham Sharma, Priya Maravi, Sharvan Sehrawat, Yogender Pal Khasa","doi":"10.1007/s00449-026-03438-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attributes of camelid-derived single-domain antibodies (sdAbs), such as enhanced antigen specificity, improved solubility and stability, efficient tissue penetration, and superior biodistribution, make them preferable therapeutics for diverse applications, including the treatment of cancers, neurological disorders, infectious diseases, and intoxication. Limited availability and high cost of antivenoms necessitate the discovery of alternative neutralizers. This investigation presents a proof of concept for developing a cost-effective Escherichia coli-based platform to produce high yields of an sdAb specific to Russell's viper venom, denoted as 'FRV'. The gene encoding the FRV protein was cloned into the pET28a vector, and expression was evaluated in shake flasks using both complex and chemically defined media at various temperatures, achieving a maximum concentration of ~ 190 mg/L and a specific product yield (Y<sub>P/X</sub>) of 38 mg/g DCW. Solubility assessments of FRV sdAb indicated the formation of inclusion bodies (IBs) under all tested conditions. Multiple strategies were employed to simplify and enhance IB solubilization, refolding, and Ni-NTA purification, yielding ~ 85% recovery and ~ 90% purity. Additionally, FRV immunoreactivity and neutralization activity were further validated by immunoblotting, ELISA, and in vitro phospholipase inhibition assay. FRV sdAb expression was subsequently scaled up via fed-batch fermentation in 1 L and 2.5 L cultures using different optimization strategies. Systematic evaluation of cultivation parameters, including induction OD<sub>600</sub>, post-induction temperature, feed composition, and antibiotic levels, yielded a maximum FRV concentration of ~ 3.8 g/L and a Y<sub>P/X</sub> of 59 mg/g DCW. Among the fermentation strategies evaluated, induction temperature was identified as a key factor influencing product yields and plasmid stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9024,"journal":{"name":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-026-03438-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Attributes of camelid-derived single-domain antibodies (sdAbs), such as enhanced antigen specificity, improved solubility and stability, efficient tissue penetration, and superior biodistribution, make them preferable therapeutics for diverse applications, including the treatment of cancers, neurological disorders, infectious diseases, and intoxication. Limited availability and high cost of antivenoms necessitate the discovery of alternative neutralizers. This investigation presents a proof of concept for developing a cost-effective Escherichia coli-based platform to produce high yields of an sdAb specific to Russell's viper venom, denoted as 'FRV'. The gene encoding the FRV protein was cloned into the pET28a vector, and expression was evaluated in shake flasks using both complex and chemically defined media at various temperatures, achieving a maximum concentration of ~ 190 mg/L and a specific product yield (YP/X) of 38 mg/g DCW. Solubility assessments of FRV sdAb indicated the formation of inclusion bodies (IBs) under all tested conditions. Multiple strategies were employed to simplify and enhance IB solubilization, refolding, and Ni-NTA purification, yielding ~ 85% recovery and ~ 90% purity. Additionally, FRV immunoreactivity and neutralization activity were further validated by immunoblotting, ELISA, and in vitro phospholipase inhibition assay. FRV sdAb expression was subsequently scaled up via fed-batch fermentation in 1 L and 2.5 L cultures using different optimization strategies. Systematic evaluation of cultivation parameters, including induction OD600, post-induction temperature, feed composition, and antibiotic levels, yielded a maximum FRV concentration of ~ 3.8 g/L and a YP/X of 59 mg/g DCW. Among the fermentation strategies evaluated, induction temperature was identified as a key factor influencing product yields and plasmid stability.
期刊介绍:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering provides an international peer-reviewed forum to facilitate the discussion between engineering and biological science to find efficient solutions in the development and improvement of bioprocesses. The aim of the journal is to focus more attention on the multidisciplinary approaches for integrative bioprocess design. Of special interest are the rational manipulation of biosystems through metabolic engineering techniques to provide new biocatalysts as well as the model based design of bioprocesses (up-stream processing, bioreactor operation and downstream processing) that will lead to new and sustainable production processes.
Contributions are targeted at new approaches for rational and evolutive design of cellular systems by taking into account the environment and constraints of technical production processes, integration of recombinant technology and process design, as well as new hybrid intersections such as bioinformatics and process systems engineering. Manuscripts concerning the design, simulation, experimental validation, control, and economic as well as ecological evaluation of novel processes using biosystems or parts thereof (e.g., enzymes, microorganisms, mammalian cells, plant cells, or tissue), their related products, or technical devices are also encouraged.
The Editors will consider papers for publication based on novelty, their impact on biotechnological production and their contribution to the advancement of bioprocess and biosystems engineering science. Submission of papers dealing with routine aspects of bioprocess engineering (e.g., routine application of established methodologies, and description of established equipment) are discouraged.