Airflows redefine the cost of aerial transport in the wild

IF 47.3 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Science Pub Date : 2026-10-15 DOI:10.1126/science.aee6550
Martina Scacco, Jeroen B. Smaers, Yuval Werber, Karen Aghababyan, Eneko Arrondo, Ortwin Aschenborn, Nyambayar Batbayar, Hans-Günther Bauer, Paolo Becciu, Dmitrijs Boiko, Andre J. Botha, Julio Blas, Nik C. Cole, Ainara Cortés-Avizanda, Sebastian M. Cruz, Teja Curk, John Davies, Dina K. N. Dechmann, Ben J. Dilley, José Donazar, Olivier Duriez, Ron Efrat, Kyle H. Elliott, Jakob Fahr, Wolfgang Fiedler, John Fieberg, Andrea Flack, Anna Gagliardo, Peter Glazov, Martin U. Grüebler, Ohad Hatzofe, Urs G. Kormann, Andrea Kölzsch, Helmut Kruckenberg, Sergio A. Lambertucci, Monique MacKenzie, Qenan Maxhuni, Tomaž Mihelič, Flavio Monti, Inge Müller, Lourdes Mugica Valdes, Ran Nathan, Elham Nourani, Allison Patterson, Ivan Pokrovsky, Peter G. Ryan, Patrick Scherler, Daniel Schmidt-Rothmund, Sara H. Schweitzer, José A. Sanchez-Zapata, Nir Sapir, Stefan Schoombie, Andrea Sforzi, Sherub Sherub, Māris Strazds, Gareth Tate, Lindy J. Thompson, Francis Van Oordt, Mariëlle van Toor, Jonas Waldenström, Natalie Weber, Shannon Whelan, Hannah Williams, Martin Wikelski, David Wolfson, Kerri Wolter, Kamran Safi, Emily L. C. Shepard
{"title":"Airflows redefine the cost of aerial transport in the wild","authors":"Martina Scacco,&nbsp;Jeroen B. Smaers,&nbsp;Yuval Werber,&nbsp;Karen Aghababyan,&nbsp;Eneko Arrondo,&nbsp;Ortwin Aschenborn,&nbsp;Nyambayar Batbayar,&nbsp;Hans-Günther Bauer,&nbsp;Paolo Becciu,&nbsp;Dmitrijs Boiko,&nbsp;Andre J. Botha,&nbsp;Julio Blas,&nbsp;Nik C. Cole,&nbsp;Ainara Cortés-Avizanda,&nbsp;Sebastian M. Cruz,&nbsp;Teja Curk,&nbsp;John Davies,&nbsp;Dina K. N. Dechmann,&nbsp;Ben J. Dilley,&nbsp;José Donazar,&nbsp;Olivier Duriez,&nbsp;Ron Efrat,&nbsp;Kyle H. Elliott,&nbsp;Jakob Fahr,&nbsp;Wolfgang Fiedler,&nbsp;John Fieberg,&nbsp;Andrea Flack,&nbsp;Anna Gagliardo,&nbsp;Peter Glazov,&nbsp;Martin U. Grüebler,&nbsp;Ohad Hatzofe,&nbsp;Urs G. Kormann,&nbsp;Andrea Kölzsch,&nbsp;Helmut Kruckenberg,&nbsp;Sergio A. Lambertucci,&nbsp;Monique MacKenzie,&nbsp;Qenan Maxhuni,&nbsp;Tomaž Mihelič,&nbsp;Flavio Monti,&nbsp;Inge Müller,&nbsp;Lourdes Mugica Valdes,&nbsp;Ran Nathan,&nbsp;Elham Nourani,&nbsp;Allison Patterson,&nbsp;Ivan Pokrovsky,&nbsp;Peter G. Ryan,&nbsp;Patrick Scherler,&nbsp;Daniel Schmidt-Rothmund,&nbsp;Sara H. Schweitzer,&nbsp;José A. Sanchez-Zapata,&nbsp;Nir Sapir,&nbsp;Stefan Schoombie,&nbsp;Andrea Sforzi,&nbsp;Sherub Sherub,&nbsp;Māris Strazds,&nbsp;Gareth Tate,&nbsp;Lindy J. Thompson,&nbsp;Francis Van Oordt,&nbsp;Mariëlle van Toor,&nbsp;Jonas Waldenström,&nbsp;Natalie Weber,&nbsp;Shannon Whelan,&nbsp;Hannah Williams,&nbsp;Martin Wikelski,&nbsp;David Wolfson,&nbsp;Kerri Wolter,&nbsp;Kamran Safi,&nbsp;Emily L. C. Shepard","doi":"10.1126/science.aee6550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >Fuel economy matters to both animals and machines, as the cost of transport can determine where, when, and how far locomotion is possible. However, established estimates of these values for animal flight come from laboratories and treat the atmosphere as constant, even though free-flying animals routinely extract energy from atmospheric flows. Using high-resolution movement data, we estimate the cost of transport for 50 bird and bat species flying in the wild. Our results revise the classic ranking of locomotion costs, suggesting that flying can be cheaper than swimming though almost as costly as running, depending on interactions between physical environment, morphology, and behavior. Linking transport costs to atmospheric conditions provides a mechanistic basis for predicting how changing windscapes will reshape the energetics, movements, and distributions of flying animals.</div>","PeriodicalId":21678,"journal":{"name":"Science","volume":"394 6821","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":47.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aee6550","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fuel economy matters to both animals and machines, as the cost of transport can determine where, when, and how far locomotion is possible. However, established estimates of these values for animal flight come from laboratories and treat the atmosphere as constant, even though free-flying animals routinely extract energy from atmospheric flows. Using high-resolution movement data, we estimate the cost of transport for 50 bird and bat species flying in the wild. Our results revise the classic ranking of locomotion costs, suggesting that flying can be cheaper than swimming though almost as costly as running, depending on interactions between physical environment, morphology, and behavior. Linking transport costs to atmospheric conditions provides a mechanistic basis for predicting how changing windscapes will reshape the energetics, movements, and distributions of flying animals.
气流重新定义了野外空中运输的成本
燃料经济性对动物和机器都很重要,因为运输成本可以决定运动的地点、时间和距离。然而,对动物飞行的这些值的既定估计来自实验室,并将大气视为常数,即使自由飞行的动物通常从大气流动中获取能量。利用高分辨率的运动数据,我们估计了50种鸟类和蝙蝠在野外飞行的运输成本。我们的研究结果修正了经典的运动成本排名,表明飞行可以比游泳更便宜,尽管几乎和跑步一样昂贵,这取决于物理环境、形态和行为之间的相互作用。将运输成本与大气条件联系起来,为预测变化的景观如何重塑飞行动物的能量学、运动和分布提供了机制基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science
Science 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
61.10
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Science is a leading outlet for scientific news, commentary, and cutting-edge research. Through its print and online incarnations, Science reaches an estimated worldwide readership of more than one million. Science’s authorship is global too, and its articles consistently rank among the world's most cited research. Science serves as a forum for discussion of important issues related to the advancement of science by publishing material on which a consensus has been reached as well as including the presentation of minority or conflicting points of view. Accordingly, all articles published in Science—including editorials, news and comment, and book reviews—are signed and reflect the individual views of the authors and not official points of view adopted by AAAS or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Science seeks to publish those papers that are most influential in their fields or across fields and that will significantly advance scientific understanding. Selected papers should present novel and broadly important data, syntheses, or concepts. They should merit recognition by the wider scientific community and general public provided by publication in Science, beyond that provided by specialty journals. Science welcomes submissions from all fields of science and from any source. The editors are committed to the prompt evaluation and publication of submitted papers while upholding high standards that support reproducibility of published research. Science is published weekly; selected papers are published online ahead of print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书